
Zelda: The Movie...?
#91
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 09 October 2004 - 08:03 PM
As for using LoTR as an example, WHAT KIND OF MORON ARE YOU? Tolkien Wrote that BOOK for YEARS AND YEARS before it was done. A movie based on that, even though scens were cut out for obvious reasons is bound to reach people. LoTR has a theme about life that applies to everyone. Zelda doesn't. There are no deep meanings, no life long struggles. A story about good versus evil may be good for the two hours it runs, but what happens after people leave the theatre? Nothing, their lives are not impacted. They only remember the campy special effects.
Movies that make an impact have a deep, thought provoking theme. That's right, theme. LoTR's theme is about Death, not Good versus Evil, which is a coverup. Other movies, such as the Butterfly Effect, Fight Club, Count of Monte Cristo,and other movies like this all make a person introspect. That is the kind of movie that makes an impact, creates adoring viewers, sparks interest, and brings in new fans. If a Zelda movie can be made with these qualities, without changing the personalities of the characters, and not destroying continuity of the story, while having enough good dialougue and special efffects, then I will gladly change my opinion about the whole subject. As of right now, NOTHING that has been said has shown me that these qualities could successfully be put in a movie about a little gimp wearing tights.
I guess the question is, why do YOU like Zelda? Obviously you feel that it cannot stand its ground as a game series, but you feel it can hold out if it chjeepens itself and markets to a "new audience" by having a movie made of it using the same ideas and principles. Fact is, if they haven't been drawn in already by the games, why would the movie draw them in? If we were to make it so many people would like it, the entire feeling of the series would contridict the series. No one would buy the games except for the same people who have already, and the select few people that have been living in a padded room for the past seventeen years.
#92
Posted 09 October 2004 - 08:14 PM
Yeah - the essence of Zelda is going to be different for everyone.
Exactly. And the essence, as I see it, cannot even hope to be conveyed in a movie. Maybe your idea of what makes Zelda so great can be, but mine cannot, and therefore the idea of a Zelda movie disgusts me.
We've already established the fact that we're all set in our ways here; continuing this debate is pointless. Chronicle, I suggest you just leave them. They'll undoubtedly enjoy themselves more by discussing things like actors and whatnot, and it'll save everyone a futile argument.
#93
Posted 09 October 2004 - 08:21 PM
I'm attempting to put together a script right now, it's looking pretty good, by my standards, and apparently yours. I have what I *think* is good dialogue, that isn't my best area there, maybe someone would want to help me? For now, I'm directly importing the quotes form the games themselves as a sort of 'place holder' for when I can think of something else that envokes the same type of response out of a person.
I don't have a lot of stuff, considering this is a six part series, collectively known as the Legend of Zelda, which one would recall is the story about the Triforce of Courage. In my story, it is going to be held down throughout the Knight's Bloodline, through a series of tests and trials which they have been destined for for centuries. Does that make sense? And over every movie, or two movies, you get to see how these different people carry themselves over their fate, and trials, and whatnot. The six movies I have planned out as of now are as follows, but aren't set in stone yet: In this order, OoT (very condensed, ultimately features the backstory to AoL, and whatnot) Majora's Mask (which I am doubtful of, since it has little relevance to this story) The Wind Waker (An Integral part of Hyrule's History) A Link to the Past (This will Tie up the Master Sword's Story), Legend of Zelda (to introduce the Final Hero of Legend, more than anything) and, obviously Adventure of Link.
Comments...? Questions....? Gripes? Complaints?
Suggestions?
#94
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 09 October 2004 - 08:28 PM
With that I say again, a movie is a vomitatious idea and I will never condone it, but I cannot finght the overwhelming EDIT: happiness :END EDIT eeking from this forum. Thus I take my leave.
los edit: The insult was uncalled for. Don't do it again.
Thanks LoS, I got carried away -.-
#95
Posted 09 October 2004 - 08:37 PM
Thank you Chronicle, that was very helpful.
#96
Posted 10 October 2004 - 03:06 PM
#97
Posted 10 October 2004 - 03:35 PM
Any more suggestions, besides.... don't? I'm open to anything within reason.
what do you mean by a theme that is true for all people?
#98
Posted 11 October 2004 - 10:30 AM
As for why I do not believe the Zelda series might not hold its ground in the market is the decline in sales of the games since Ocarina of Time. Majora's Mask, at best, sold about half as many games than Ocarina of Time and the Wind Waker sold about 4 to 5 million copies which was still greatly less than Ocarina of Time. The reason to bring Zelda to the theatres is a matter of cost, to buy a video game system is more than 100 dollars at least and then to purchase a game is 50-60 dollars when they first come out. That is a lot of money to throw out for a single game one may find interesting such as Zelda, and a game such as holds a very low amount of replay value just because of the type of game it is. Basically, you have just wasted 160 dollars to buy a Zelda game which you can play 1-3 times before you are bored of it. To go to the movies and simply watch the Zelda series to see what it is all about would only cost someone less than 10 dollars in the theatres. Thus, a lot more than 7 million people would go to watch the Zelda movie which would greatly increase Zelda's popularity by a vast majority if the movie is very good. Chances are it will be very good or at least good enough to catch the attention of more fans than the video games could because the movie industry is a bigger market.
#99
Posted 19 October 2004 - 07:17 AM
#100
Guest_Lany79_*
Posted 20 October 2004 - 12:18 PM
Since some of you are, or are against, a movie, what are your thoughts on a novels based on the Legend of Zelda. I'm putting together a story right now because I want to create a full length (and probably long) novel.
#101
Posted 20 October 2004 - 03:43 PM
#102
Posted 20 October 2004 - 04:08 PM

#103
Posted 20 October 2004 - 05:40 PM
And, Lany79, what book, per se, are you writing? I'm writing a novel on OoT so far, 50 pages, in the Story Board, that no one STILL, has bothered to look at. (The first chapter only is posted, not 50 pages.)
Tell me your ideas, and, if you don't mind, could you critique mine?
#104
Guest_Lany79_*
Posted 20 October 2004 - 09:29 PM
And I'll take a look at what you have posted and give you some feedback. And, when I have something more concrete written, I'll be happy to have you critique it.
And NightStar, I know it is a big task. However, I tend to write quite detailed, so I don't think I'd have a problem giving enough information and description to properly involve the reader, and give them the visuals. I hope anyway.

#105
Posted 24 October 2004 - 07:42 PM
Just so you know, L-O-S, they said the same thing about Lord of the Rings.Regardless of how many series standards you throw in, it is impossible for a movie to capture the essence of Zelda.
The very idea is ludicrous.

TSA: do you have anything else past a first act? All I keep reading is the same thing. It's hard to judge an entire screenplay on just your first act alone. Oh and another thing, why is your first act sixty pages? How long are you planning on making this thing?
And, if anyone's interested, I have my own full-length script I did a while ago. You're all welcome to read it if you want.
#106
Posted 24 October 2004 - 08:14 PM
And NightStar, I know it is a big task. However, I tend to write quite detailed, so I don't think I'd have a problem giving enough information and description to properly involve the reader, and give them the visuals. I hope anyway.
Well good for you! I think that it would be interesting, but I'd like to see a movie made live action style (as I have already voted for)
#107
Guest_TanakaBros06_*
Posted 24 October 2004 - 09:08 PM
#108
Posted 24 October 2004 - 09:33 PM
#109
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 25 October 2004 - 12:50 AM
Zelda, though a great video game series, Can not match in any way, shape, or form, the complexity of plot, character and theme that LoTR had. One cannot compare these two completely different genres without sounding ignorant. It is due to this immersment factor that Zelda must have to survive as a gaming series that said movie could never capture the essence of the Zelda games.
So I will leave, until the next striking comment.
#110
Posted 25 October 2004 - 07:23 AM
If LOTR was so complex, yet was made into a movie and did NOT anger fans across the globe, (maybe a couple over-the-top ones,) then the "less complex," Zelda series should be slightly easier to adapt.
As for the theory of immersement, that's bull. Many people detest video games, but love movies. People will get attached to a movie earlier because there are no controls to learn. Gamers, while not a rare species, are overwhelmed by non-gamers. People just don't FEEL like they are INSIDE a video game. A movie? Perhaps. Perhaps indeed. We don't need to include subquests, and yes, we must change story details, (Link can't ALWAYS run from dungeon to dungeon,) but a Zelda movie can and would be awesome!
#111
Posted 25 October 2004 - 01:12 PM
And, although Husse pretty much responded to Chronicle the way I would have, I want to elaborate on one detail. When I mentioned LOTR I was not mentioning it with regards to story complexity or character depth, but merely with regards to people's preconceived notion that "it can't be done." If we spend all of our time convincing ourselves that something "can't be done" then we never will know. As long as the film version of zelda remains true to the essence of the games it will do just fine.
I also think that people who are so definite about not having a zelda film should really look at the bigger picture. The two mediums are not the same. Even if your worst nightmares do come true and they do make the game into a film, that doesn't necessarily erase from the planet the games as well. The games will always be there. Nothing will change that. And if the movie does come out and it is horrible, look on the bright side, it will most likely renew your love of the games and make you see them in an entirely whole new light.

#112
Posted 26 October 2004 - 01:54 AM
Just my 5 cents...
#113
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 26 October 2004 - 07:07 AM
Sure, I'll still have the old ones, but that doesn't mean anything if new ones don't come out to renew interest.
There has never, ever been an enjoyable movie based on a video game.
Ever.
#114
Posted 26 October 2004 - 07:16 AM
#115
Posted 26 October 2004 - 01:20 PM
Never you say? Maybe you shouldn't be so absolute because you seem to have forgotten Super Mario Bros, Resident Evil and Mortal Kombat. Those were not very good and yet the subsequent games released after the movies are doing just fine.Problem is, Thabto, a horrible movie changes preconceptions people have about the games. Fewer people will buy them, and they will no longer be made.
Sure, I'll still have the old ones, but that doesn't mean anything if new ones don't come out to renew interest.
There has never, ever been an enjoyable movie based on a video game.
Ever.
The problem here seems to be that you're afraid your own preconceptions will change and are thus applying that fear to everybody in the whole world believing that they all believe the same thing. Rather presumptuous of you don't you think?
#116
Posted 26 October 2004 - 03:01 PM
IMO, if that happens, just toss it in the garbage and wait for someone better to try. I've seen the Zelda cartoons, they repulse me, but I quite frankly don't care. I'm talking about a Zelda movie done by a decent and intelligent director, like Peter Jackson, (OK, maybe that's stretching things,) or something like that.
Let me guess, no-moviers...can't happen? Well, everyone's entitled to their own opinion. SOMEDAY, someone's just going to stumble onto this little old thing called Zelda, maybe their nephew's playing it, and say, "Hey! We've got something here!"
#117
Posted 27 October 2004 - 02:24 PM
If he's that worried about it then he doesn't have to go watch it. Funny thing is though, if they do make a movie I bet you a hundred bucks he'll be the first one in line.He is rather attached to many theories on Majora's Mask, seeing as the game is so mysterious. I think, just in Chronicle's case, that he's a little afraid that his theories are maybe even pure canon, will be absolutely butchered by a film.

The director definitely needs to be a fan of the games. Or if not, then somebody who's willing to do the research.IMO, if that happens, just toss it in the garbage and wait for someone better to try. I've seen the Zelda cartoons, they repulse me, but I quite frankly don't care. I'm talking about a Zelda movie done by a decent and intelligent director, like Peter Jackson, (OK, maybe that's stretching things,) or something like that.
I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet.Let me guess, no-moviers...can't happen? Well, everyone's entitled to their own opinion. SOMEDAY, someone's just going to stumble onto this little old thing called Zelda, maybe their nephew's playing it, and say, "Hey! We've got something here!"
#118
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 27 October 2004 - 03:44 PM
Never you say? Maybe you shouldn't be so absolute because you seem to have forgotten Super Mario Bros, Resident Evil and Mortal Kombat. Those were not very good and yet the subsequent games released after the movies are doing just fine.
This is only partly true. These games have become more and more... shall we say, Ignored? People no longer view these games as groundbreaking or awesome. They have been cheapened and overused.
The problem here seems to be that you're afraid your own preconceptions will change and are thus applying that fear to everybody in the whole world believing that they all believe the same thing. Rather presumptuous of you don't you think?
Everyone in the whole world? No. Though it is my fear that people that have never played the games would never play them after seeing a horrible movie. I did not say that everyone is a fraid of that, you and many other people are not afraid of this outcome, or maybe you just don't understand the point I'm making. Maybe you should try to see things from a different point of view instead of insulting everyone that has a view different than yours. I think a movie is a horrible idea that will not only cheapen the series but destroy my respect for everyone involved with it.
He is rather attached to many theories on Majora's Mask, seeing as the game is so mysterious. I think, just in Chronicle's case, that he's a little afraid that his theories are maybe even pure canon, will be absolutely butchered by a film.
What theories? Timeline theories? I don't understand this paragraph. It makes no sense. I have NEVER claimed my timeline theory to be cannon and I welcome ANY GAME that can change my ideas about it. Please do not lower yourself into insulting me for something that isn't true.
IMO, if that happens, just toss it in the garbage and wait for someone better to try. I've seen the Zelda cartoons, they repulse me, but I quite frankly don't care. I'm talking about a Zelda movie done by a decent and intelligent director, like Peter Jackson, (OK, maybe that's stretching things,) or something like that.
Let me guess, no-moviers...can't happen? Well, everyone's entitled to their own opinion. SOMEDAY, someone's just going to stumble onto this little old thing called Zelda, maybe their nephew's playing it, and say, "Hey! We've got something here!"
May I be dead and buried or may I have lost all interest by then.
If he's that worried about it then he doesn't have to go watch it. Funny thing is though, if they do make a movie I bet you a hundred bucks he'll be the first one in line.
Who are you betting? I don't watch movies in theatres. Not only that, I don't watch movies until my friends recommend it, even then I usually don't watch movies. Why is a Zelda movie such a big deal then? Because anything with the same title effects the games. If I made a children's show called the Legend of Zelda, and it sucked, sales would dip until:
A. The show is cancelled, or
B. About twenty years pass
Of course, this has already happened. Luckily, the show was cancelled, even though many still remember it.
I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet.
Not I, Nintendo is too smart to consent to another bad movie idea.
#119
Posted 27 October 2004 - 05:36 PM
Do you have any facts to back this claim up or will continue to treat your opinions as if they are.This is only partly true. These games have become more and more... shall we say, Ignored? People no longer view these games as groundbreaking or awesome. They have been cheapened and overused.
So they don't play them after watching the movie? What's the big deal?Everyone in the whole world? No. Though it is my fear that people that have never played the games would never play them after seeing a horrible movie.
Neither. I'm trying to understand why you even give a damn. It's pretty obvious you like the games. So stick to them and let everybody else have what they want to have.I did not say that everyone is a fraid of that, you and many other people are not afraid of this outcome, or maybe you just don't understand the point I'm making.
Are you always this melodramatic?Maybe you should try to see things from a different point of view instead of insulting everyone that has a view different than yours. I think a movie is a horrible idea that will not only cheapen the series but destroy my respect for everyone involved with it.
Then you don't watch movies, do you?; seeing as the majority of film is shot for movie theaters.Who are you betting? I don't watch movies in theatres.
Are you even capable of making up your own mind?Not only that, I don't watch movies until my friends recommend it,
Again I ask: what do you care? If you don't watch movies and are so in love with games as to think any variation whatsoever is heresy then don't watch them!even then I usually don't watch movies.
You should be asking yourself that. You're the one that doesn't watch movies.Why is a Zelda movie such a big deal then?
The television show never ruined the series. If it had you wouldn't be anxiously awaiting for two new Zelda games, would you? The only the thing that can ruin the series are the games themselves. Nowhere is this more evident than with the release of AoL.Because anything with the same title effects the games. If I made a children's show called the Legend of Zelda, and it sucked, sales would dip until:
A. The show is cancelled, or
B. About twenty years pass
Of course, this has already happened. Luckily, the show was cancelled, even though many still remember it.
#120
Posted 27 October 2004 - 06:43 PM
Wow, thabto, that was very thourough and rude. A one-two punch. Seriously, though, I think an apology is in order. You're making the prosecution look bad...
And Chronicle, I didn't say your ideas were canon, I said your ideas OR canon may be violated, and you don't want that, correct?