
Zelda: The Movie...?
#121
Posted 27 October 2004 - 07:13 PM
#122
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 27 October 2004 - 09:37 PM
Are you always this mellowdramatic?
If you mean Considerate and Correct when expressing my opinion, Then yes. As for the rest of you post, I see no need for me to respond to it. I do not need you to harass me because I disagree with you. I have already explained why I am against a movie well enough. Please be civilized.
No Worries, I am going to ignore rude posts. I have only respect for your opinon, even though I disagree.0_0.
Wow, thabto, that was very thourough and rude. A one-two punch. Seriously, though, I think an apology is in order. You're making the prosecution look bad...
Well no, no one does. But that's not one of the reasons I'm against the movie. If it were, I'd be against the games too.And Chronicle, I didn't say your ideas were canon, I said your ideas OR canon may be violated, and you don't want that, correct?
I'll apologize if he agrees to calm down and stop making ridiculous claims.
I've been nothing but calm. YOu are the one attacking me. If you mean stop arguing when you say "stop making ridiculus claims", I am afraid I cannot comply. The reason this forum is here is so people can banter points of view.
#123
Posted 28 October 2004 - 12:21 PM
"I think a movie is a horrible idea that will not only cheapen the series but destroy my respect for everyone involved with it."If you mean Considerate and Correct when expressing my opinion, Then yes. As for the rest of you post, I see no need for me to respond to it. I do not need you to harass me because I disagree with you. I have already explained why I am against a movie well enough. Please be civilized.
I've been nothing but calm. YOu are the one attacking me. If you mean stop arguing when you say "stop making ridiculus claims", I am afraid I cannot comply. The reason this forum is here is so people can banter points of view.
And you don't call that being melodaramtic? That a movie will cheapen the whole series just because it's made into a movie? Look all I'm asking is for some support to your claim that this is so. Name one game that has been cheapened on the whole. And I'm not talking about a game that was never doing well in the first place or a game that was already losing steam. I'm talking about a game equal to Zelda. Perhaps Final Fantasy. Because, if I'm reading you correctly, nothing should be adapted from any other medium at all because it would cheapen the "original" story.
#124
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 28 October 2004 - 04:40 PM
I have no proof to many of my statements, because they are opinions. AS ARE YOURS! You have no more proof than I for your statements. I do, however, have previous examples of several horrible video game movies.
Generalizing my statements is offensive. I have never said that turning a book, or a play, or a musical, or even a poem into a different media cheapens the original story. All of these follow a linear pattern. Every time you read them, the story will be the same. Not so with video games, one never plays it Exactly the same way. Something is always a little different. Translating this flexibility into a rigid structure makes it lose something, a quality that it had before.
The only way I would accept the idea of a movie, is if the creators of the games wrote the script and were on set to assure that it went the way it should. THey would know what to do.
Thank you, though, for being more considerate in you last post. I appreciate it.
EDIT:
Name one game that has been cheapened on the whole. And I'm not talking about a game that was never doing well in the first place or a game that was already losing steam. I'm talking about a game equal to Zelda.
I cannot fulfill this request, due to the fact that there is no game series equal to Zelda, in my opinion. Final Fanstasy is different due to the fact that it is more linear based, and each story has absolutely no effect on the others.
#125
Posted 28 October 2004 - 05:27 PM
Doing that would ensure a cheapening of the experience as you call it. Why? Well, say they did make one of the games into a miniseries where every event was taken into account. What you'd essentially have is the video game without the interactive element involved. And there's nothing worse than playing a game where you have little to no interaction with it whatsover.No, maybe, someday, there will be a well done movie based on a video game, but this could never be Zelda, due to the feeling of exploration and connection of all the games. Taking all of these things and condensing them into a two hour movie cheapens the experience and makes the series look bad. One could perhaps turn one of the games into a miniseries, where very event is looked into, instead of condensing it, but these usually lack the funding to be very good.
Opinions are based on facts. Facts are based on evidence. It would do you well to remember this. My opinion that no movie based on a game has ever ruined that video game series is based on the fact (or lack of facts) supporting such a claim in the first place.I have no proof to many of my statements, because they are opinions. AS ARE YOURS! You have no more proof than I for your statements. I do, however, have previous examples of several horrible video game movies.
Let me refer you back to what you said earlier:Generalizing my statements is offensive. I have never said that turning a book, or a play, or a musical, or even a poem into a different media cheapens the original story. All of these follow a linear pattern. Every time you read them, the story will be the same. Not so with video games, one never plays it Exactly the same way. Something is always a little different. Translating this flexibility into a rigid structure makes it lose something, a quality that it had before.
This quote of yours isn't stating your opinion as it no way implies that it is your thoughts or feelings. The sentence structure indicates that you are stating fact. Going off of that basis, one could only assume that you also did not approve of other adaptations as well.Problem is, Thabto, a horrible movie changes preconceptions people have about the games. Fewer people will buy them, and they will no longer be made.
Like they did with Final Fantasy?The only way I would accept the idea of a movie, is if the creators of the games wrote the script and were on set to assure that it went the way it should. THey would know what to do.
Define linear based.I cannot fulfill this request, due to the fact that there is no game series equal to Zelda, in my opinion. Final Fanstasy is different due to the fact that it is more linear based, and each story has absolutely no effect on the others.
#126
Posted 28 October 2004 - 05:33 PM
#127
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 28 October 2004 - 06:45 PM
Video games can vary, one can wander for hours, or quickly go exactly where they need to go. They can cheat or savor the game. It has no linear pattern. Only the thin, game plot, actually has a linear pattern. This plot depends solely on the actions taken in the rest of the game.
With this, I will once again leave. Obviously, presenting my opinions can not be accepted maturely by some people here. Thus, I will leave those who wish to talk about a hopeless fantasy to their devices.
#128
Posted 29 October 2004 - 01:04 AM
If you were to ask me what the one thing would be that COULD kill the Zelda franchise, I would say the lack of fans of the games, not of the movie. In the case of a movie being made, it would only be good to illustrate the background story that we all already know, that way no one or facet of the storyline will be hurt.
And then again, maybe I'm wrong, but at least I'm open-minded.
#129
Posted 29 October 2004 - 01:55 PM
So in your closed world view if it can't be done, why try? Hm, I think I'm beginning to understand you a bit more.I will define linear based... again. Books, or plays, or musicals, or even poems follow a linear pattern. Every time you read them, the story will be the same. Each phrase leads to the next, like movies where each fram leads to the next.
Video games can vary, one can wander for hours, or quickly go exactly where they need to go. They can cheat or savor the game. It has no linear pattern. Only the thin, game plot, actually has a linear pattern. This plot depends solely on the actions taken in the rest of the game.
Nevertheless I'm surprised to see that you know the difference between video games and movies at all. But what really worries me is that you think one has such pull that it can forever alter the other.
I hereby crown you King of the Drama Queens. Congratulations.With this, I will once again leave. Obviously, presenting my opinions can not be accepted maturely by some people here. Thus, I will leave those who wish to talk about a hopeless fantasy to their devices.
#130
Guest_Hyliangirl_*
Posted 29 October 2004 - 04:08 PM
With Zelda i think that it could be either anime or live action. I would prefer anime if it was one of the oracles, but with OoT and MM (which were the other options i would have liked to be made into a movie) i think either would be good.
HOWEVER, i am aware of what l-o-s and Chronicle have been saying and i agree with them to an extent. It COULD ruin the series if they were to make a bad movie. Yes we'd still have the games, but everyone has their own way that they see each character. So the voices that they decide to use could fit one persons expectations and not another. The same with personality. The manga goes more into detail with personality than the games, but they could still mess up how a person sees that character if they made a movie.
Basically i am at this point:
If they make a movie and they get it RIGHT, it could be a huge leap and could be the best thing that could happen.
However if they make a movie and mess something up.....it could mean something very bad for the series and for some of the fans.
I would like to see a movie (particularly OoT) but i am also afraid of them messing it up. It would be awfully hard for them to make a movie with the magic that the games have. I am not saying impossible because ive never made a movie so i wouldn't know. But it would be hard.
Plus as ive said, what fits the expectations of one fan, might disappoint another completely. And i am not so sure i want them to take the risk.
#131
Posted 29 October 2004 - 06:01 PM
I would agree with you that if a mistake was made that it would ruin the movie. But the games? I dunno. Saying it will ruin the games is a really general statement.I would like to see a movie (particularly OoT) but i am also afraid of them messing it up. It would be awfully hard for them to make a movie with the magic that the games have. I am not saying impossible because ive never made a movie so i wouldn't know. But it would be hard.
Plus as ive said, what fits the expectations of one fan, might disappoint another completely. And i am not so sure i want them to take the risk.
But you're right when you say each individual person has their own idea of what a character should sound like or how they should act but those ideas are all based on the same presentation of the characters in the game. So I really doubt that my ideas of how Link should act, with subtle differences, would clash very much with yours.
As far as adapting OoT would go, I'm a little hazy on your idea on which changes exactly are bad. If they did adapt one of the games then there would have to be significant changes to the storyline in order to make it work. Are those the kinds of changes you would approve or disapprove of.
#132
Guest_Hyliangirl_*
Posted 29 October 2004 - 06:31 PM
I would agree with you that if a mistake was made that it would ruin the movie. But the games? I dunno. Saying it will ruin the games is a really general statement.
Well i should probably have mentioned that i didn't actually mean that the games themselves would be ruined. I meant that it could just ruin a person's image of the characters. And when i mentioned the series i meant that people who haven't already played Zelda might be put off, if the movie was bad. Could mean less people interested in buying the games and therefore could mean the downfall to the series.
I should probably have worded it better.
#133
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 29 October 2004 - 09:41 PM
Except for the fact that I am completely against it.
And one word for you.... Pokemon....
Think about that before you go to sleep....
#134
Guest_Hyliangirl_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 10:19 AM
And yes i like pokemon, but what does it have to do with this? o_O
#135
Guest_LinkLover_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 03:18 PM
#136
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 05:23 PM
I did not mean that you copied my post. I was basically saying that I made the same points you had. That's all.
#137
Guest_Hyliangirl_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 05:32 PM
And yes the games came out long before the pokemon tv series and movies. Although personally i like the movies. But i hate the tv series. Thats what mainly dragged it down.
Good example though.
#138
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 05:46 PM
#139
Guest_Hyliangirl_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:34 PM
I can see your point. I certainly don't want that to happen to Link.
#140
Posted 30 October 2004 - 08:28 PM
Ah, Pokemon....
Okay, jet lagged here... 20 rupees to whoever can tell me whats happened since the last time i posted in here in as much detail as possible, and as short as possible. Don't forget, I'm still here, working on it... PM me some suggestions but don't make it like "3AT $Hit & Diiiiiiiiii"
#141
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 30 October 2004 - 08:58 PM
I basically repeeated my points of why a movie's a bad idea... the most effective apparently being the last one I made.
#142
Posted 31 October 2004 - 04:50 PM
Act II is 60+, but only about 30 of it is up.
It hasn't changed in about a month, the script. But it's been changed quite a bit on my end. Tonight I'm uploading the newest draft.
In case you're wondering how far I am in the script as a whole - Page 85.
#143
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:09 PM
You're certainly not one to talk about being close-minded. You being a film student (or as you put it, "Filming is my religion...") makes you think that all movies are inherently perfect, and that problems with a movie are actually problems with the viewer. Case in point: the Matrix trilogy, the Wachowski brothers, and your quote war debate with Steve and Granite.So in your closed world view if it can't be done, why try? Hm, I think I'm beginning to understand you a bit more.
#144
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:46 PM
#145
Posted 31 October 2004 - 07:16 PM
maybe i'm dumb... but... over what game / games are you doing your script on??
#146
Posted 31 October 2004 - 07:19 PM
that's good, TSA.
maybe i'm dumb... but... over what game / games are you doing your script on??
I think the basic premise is OoT, with some elements taken from other games so the movie's not a carbon copy of the game. Plus, some original stuff for flair.

#147
Posted 31 October 2004 - 08:47 PM
When do we get to see it?

#148
Guest_chronicle_*
Posted 01 November 2004 - 07:51 AM
#149
Posted 01 November 2004 - 08:11 AM
#150
Posted 01 November 2004 - 01:31 PM
Dude, I never once said the Matrix trilogy was perfect. In fact, I said the exact opposite and admitted to that several times. And, yes, film is my religion. You gotta problem with that?You're certainly not one to talk about being close-minded. You being a film student (or as you put it, "Filming is my religion...") makes you think that all movies are inherently perfect, and that problems with a movie are actually problems with the viewer. Case in point: the Matrix trilogy, the Wachowski brothers, and your quote war debate with Steve and Granite.
Honestly, I don't know where you pull half of you crap out from. I've never once said that movies are inherently perfect. But if you want to get into a film war with me by all means start up another post and I'll be happy to debate that with you.
Pokemon is hardly Zelda. And, again, you're stating opinion rather than fact. Do you have any evidence to support your idea that the pokemon games were ruined by the tv series and the movie?And one word for you.... Pokemon....
Think about that before you go to sleep....
This is a good comment. Is it directed at me or TSA?'tis true. Whethere or not I think they should make a movie, I would like to see this thing too... But you must have theme... Or the whole thing will be pointless.