What is this difference? Since when where they two different things? Owning a piece or having it in your body, when was this distinction made?
In TWW, if not sooner. In the game Link is shown as first just having the ToC as an item and then having it "bestowed" upon him by the gods, which is when it starts to reside in him. You would have known this if you actually read anything I said.
“Okay, I'm trying to be patient with you guys but that's just stupid.” Just like I said, everyone else is wrong but you, and if they say different, then they’re hypocrites.
No, you're not a hypocrite because you disagree with me about a game, you're a hypocrite because you accuse me of being rude and of being unaccepting of other views and yet you are exhibiting this behavior far more than I am.
After he was weakened in the battle, he used his strength to bring the tower down, and then transformed into Ganon out of pure evil/hatred/power when his last ditch efforts had failed. By saying he was beaten, he could simply mean that Link…had beaten him.
“The six Sages will open the sealed door and lure Ganondorf back into the Sacred Realm. I will then seal the door to the Sacred Realm from this world. Thus, Ganondorf the Evil King will vanish from Hyrule.”
The goal of the final battle was to get Ganondorf back into the SR because they knew he could not be defeated. If this was not the case, Link could just kill him. Zelda and the sages knew they had to seal him away because he could not be killed with a Triforce, so Zelda has no reason to think he is dead.
That was the plan before Zelda was kidnapped. How are you not getting this? Zelda said he was using "his last breath". That means she believed he was in the throes of death.
Trash-talking is a device that one hides behind to make his argument look better by downgrading another. Personally, I think its funny how you tell us all our arguments hold no water and that yours are absolute and supported by the text. Its sad really.
Nope, I'm actually insulting you because you're being rude, hypocritical and closed-minded. My argument is backed by facts far more than yours so I don't really
need to resort to trash-talking. I guess you do though, considering that last sentence.
Anytime someone has pieced together a Triforce, the Triforce itself was already in Hyrule with a reason it was broken. Ganondorf could not have found a Triforce in the way WW Link did because it wasn’t in Hyrule, and wasn’t discovered in the first place. Your statement only works if Ganondorf entered the SR before the events of TP. If Ganondorf had found the Triforce before TP, people would know, since him owning a Triforce, or the Triforce, means the end for Hyrule.
I'm starting to think part of why you're being rude is because you don't understand me. There is nothing in the games that disagrees with Ganondorf taking the ToP from the SR in the child timeline, and in fact there are several things that suggest such an occurence. That's one of my main points, that the "divine prank" theory isn't really as "obvious" as you seem to believe it is.
I'd like to add that Ganondorf was already chosen by the gods while Link had to prove himself. You claim Ganonodrf found the Triforce of Power, then was chosen by the Gods, and then compare that to WW Link. WW Link had proven himself to be a worthy hero, then he found the Triforce of Courage. Ganondorf was chosen from the beggining in TP.
What you're saying isn't backed up by anything. When is it ever said
when either Link or Ganondorf was chosen? The facts are, Link is still bestowed the power of the gods even after he takes the Triforce. That's why Ganondorf can be considered chosen even if he went into the SR, because if the Triforce piece resides within your body, you are a chosen one.
What does Ganondorf not being able to control the power of the Gods have to do with TP? He gets stabbed…receives his power…breaks free. How much control of pure power do you need to break chains and survive a wound? He receives the power right after he is stabbed. “He had the power before” - doesn’t make sense because if he did then he would conquer Hyrule easily, and the sages would know he had it.
"He recieves the power right after he is stabbed", eh? Aren't you once again doing exactly what you accuse me of? No, he actually doesn't necessarily get it
at that point. In fact, several things suggest that you're wrong.
She says “with his last breath”, only when she knows he is beaten. Not that he is dead.
When have you ever seen the phrase "last breath" used describe something that has nothing to do with death? Even if you have, normally it is used the way we're saying it is.
He proves himself chosen (for everything) after the Tower of the Gods.
No, he isn't. Even if he was, that really means nothing to our argument. The point is that Ganondorf can still steal the Triforce out of the SR and be considered chosen as long as it inhabits his body.
How does that prove he had a Triforce. TO takes place in the child timeline where Ganondorf OOT wasn’t able to enter the SR. He was trying to take over Hyrule ith his magic alone, which is why it wasn’t enough.
That's never, ever been proven or even suggested. All that's known is that he was stopped before he took over Hyrule, which is still possible even if he stole the ToP.
Being the chosen one, or proving yourself worthy of the chosen one, means you are qualified to be…the chosen one who wields the sword and carries a Triforce.
Nope, that's never said.
First of all, all of you began comparing OO to TP, two different games where the developers probably had different intentions. Second, as we have been saying, if he had the power, he would have broken the chains instead of becoming wounded. The response you (and others) gave to this is that he didn’t know how to control that power to escape. I think that s a weak response, clinging to previous games event where the situation was totally different.
Timeline/storyline theorizing should take all games into account. Furthermore, just because you say they're different doesn't mean they are. In fact, they're more similar than different.
Here we go again, its obviously homage OOT because the rest of you say so and have managed to mold the evidence ever so slightly to make it seem so. Why is it homage to OOT anyway? Ganon is supposedly killed and comes back? Weak.
It IS an homage to OoT. The comparisons that we're making give credence to the idea that Ganondorf can be protected by the ToP and that it can grant him new power in times of need(much like how the ToC protected Link from the Twilight later on).
The idea that one doesn’t need a Triforce to own divine power.
That means nothing. An idea is just that, an idea, and the fact that everything else seems to imply that TP has the actual Triforce in it makes that idea less likely.
So we separate having a piece reside in you with possessing a piece. No, if you posses a piece, it will reside in you.
Nope, we've seen lots of times where a character has a piece of the Triforce and it is not bound to them. Ever heard of TWW and LoZ/AoL?
You are only able to say that if Ganon had the power prior to the scene and during the time the sages speak of, which is not proven or supported.
It actually is supported, moreso than what
you're saying in fact. I've actually shown you evidence in my favor, you just have an "idea" and a couple of quotes that say nothing about the "power of goddesses" and how it was given to Ganondorf after he was stabbed.
Edited by Fierce Deity Link, 21 May 2008 - 10:58 AM.