Jump to content

IPBoard Styles©Fisana

Photo

Twilight Princess - my impressions


  • Please log in to reply
323 replies to this topic

#151 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 May 2008 - 02:57 PM

Well, I deliberately left it vague, because the rest of this is completely theoretical, and has no real grounds except for my perception of time travel/paradoxes.

It's not the actual ToC from the adult timeline, because 1) Super duper über paradox, with two Triforces of Courage. 2) the ToC from the adult timeline is still there in TWW, just split up(as a result of Link severing the link between times or otherwise). My theoretical two cents is that in order to compensate for the über paradox, Link instead gets the ToC from the child timeline. (which again, I think DS actually came up with) Since someone has the Triforce, that means that it's split, so the other two pieces go to Zelda and Ganny ("divine prank," anyone?) Ganondorf doesn't take over Hyrule like in Adult OoT because he doesn't know that he's got the Triforce of Power (plus what I've already pointed out, with the whole Link's there and so are the Sages). The same is true of after he gets captured.

This theory makes sense, because as I said in previous posts, Ganondorf not knowing that this power was the Triforce would justify his actions in TP. 1)"He doesn't go after the other two pieces" check. He doesn't know that he's got a piece (or maybe that others were granted this power. Maybe), so he would never have thought of it. 2) "He would have taken over Hyrule like in the adult OoT" I've already addressed. a) the sages overpowered him, and b) he didn't know the extent of the power(or perhaps even know of it altogether) until it revived him.

Of course, this is only necessary if Link was sent to a time before he met Zelda, (and thusly he wouldn't be the hero of the Gorons or Zoras) or at least right before he pulled the sword (he would be the hero, the door of time would be open, and Ganondorf never entered the Sacred Realm. Should Link go back anytime before he pulled the sword, right before makes the most sense.) As opposed to right after he pulled the sword like in the rest of the game, which works too, you just still have to explain the Ganondorf stuff, while this theory explains itself.

This stuff could also be justification for 'connections' to the Triforce, except 1)only Link would have the connection, and 2) it would be to the Adult Timeline Triforce.


Actually, Duke's theory is that it is from the adult timeline, and that it leaves Link after he arrives in Termina. It then resolves with the "divine prank" stuff. I was confused because you were arguing against that before but now I understand. You have a pretty good theory, but I like the idea of Ganondorf getting the Triforce himself so I stand by my theory. Still, it's good know what you believe so we can all understand where we agree and disagree on things.

#152 Duke Serkol

Duke Serkol

    Famicom

  • ZL Staff
  • 1,413 posts

Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:17 PM

Who said Link had to fight Ganondorf? All he's got to do is tip off Zelda (which I assume OoT's ending is,) and maybe awaken some sages (which he doesn't need the Master Sword for.) Aren't the sages the ones who dealt with him in TP?

But aren't the sages the ones that couldn't seal Ganon in OoT until Link was done stabbing him? (And there were seven too, not just six).

What, the Triforce doesn't appear after Ganondorf dies like in in the first game (before most of the Triforce Mythos came about?) You can't accept a retcon for a 20 year old game, but a 10 year old one's OK.

I would, if I thought there was one. However it seems to me that the mechanic seen in LoZ is consistent with OoT whereas that of TP isn't.

ancient Picori, who are said to have stronger magic than their modern incarnations.

I don't recall that being said. But it doesn't matter because:

Besides, maybe the Minish used Life Force to construct the Light Force, like using the willingly given life energy of their fallen comrades or something, who the hell knows? The Light Force was introduced before PH anyway.

According to Jumbie, in the Japanese games it's force in MC and it is force in PH. No difference.

Being passed a physical Triforce piece as a family heirloom isn't the same as having the Light Force flow through you as a bloodline trait through the generations.

Nonetheless, some people speculate this is what happened to TP Link and Zelda.

And yes, while Triforce pieces can be taken, it's only when all three are brought together when they return to their neutral form. You can't just rip someone open and take the Triforce out of their gut or something.

You lost me here... it's possible to take the Triforce parts from someone but... it isn't? What are you saying?

Edited by Duke Serkol, 23 May 2008 - 05:17 PM.


#153 Hero of Legend

Hero of Legend

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:40 PM

According to Jumbie, in the Japanese games it's force in MC and it is force in PH. No difference.

Yes, and Vaati equates it with life force by saying he is draining Zelda's life. FSA similarly says Vaati's power is draining the life from the land. And of course Bellum is doing the same thing.

#154 Jumbie

Jumbie

    Language Freak

  • ZL Staff
  • 1,023 posts
  • Location:Germany
  • Gender:Female

Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:58 PM

And yes, while Triforce pieces can be taken, it's only when all three are brought together when they return to their neutral form. You can't just rip someone open and take the Triforce out of their gut or something.

You lost me here... it's possible to take the Triforce parts from someone but... it isn't? What are you saying?

He's saying something I never thought of... That all three Triforce bearers have to gather at the same place for one of them to be able to unite all three parts. We should definitely think about this!

#155 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:06 PM

He's saying something I never thought of... That all three Triforce bearers have to gather at the same place for one of them to be able to unite all three parts. We should definitely think about this!


The first thing that comes to mind is that in OoT and TWW, Ganondorf's primary target has always been the Triforce of Wisdom and not the Triforce of Courage. I wonder why...

#156 Hero of Legend

Hero of Legend

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:34 PM

One likely explanation is that Wisdom is the quality Ganondorf is lacking - he's no coward, after all - and with it, he would be quite close to obtaining the true force. It also probably has something to do with Link being the player character, and so he can't be captured and used as a plot-device as easily. However, I'm not sure Ganondorf was even after the ToW when he searched for Zelda in OoT; at least "I never expected them to be hidden within you two!" seems to imply he wasn't.

Edited by Hero of Legend, 23 May 2008 - 06:34 PM.


#157 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:43 PM

I'd say MPS has a point, actually. Every game in which he's looking for the Triforce bearers(OoT, TWW, debatebly TP) he doesn't make any effort to take Zelda's Triforce until Link is there. The quote in OoT about the pieces "becoming one again" and the method Ganondorf uses to combine them really seems to hit it home that he needs all three pieces to be together to do anything. Nice catch MPS.

#158 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:45 PM

The symbolism works. Also, Zelda is the key figure of Hyrulian Royalty, so as the main contender to Ganondorf's rule, he would want at least control of her power to assert his dominance.

#159 Showsni

Showsni

    The Fallen

  • Members
  • 13,386 posts
  • Location:Gloucester
  • Gender:Male
  • England

Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:51 PM

Ganondorf's primary target has always been the Triforce of Wisdom and not the Triforce of Courage. I wonder why...


Because "He who depends on power alone, without wisdom... cannot claim courage!" to quote Zelda.


#160 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2008 - 07:11 PM

Because "He who depends on power alone, without wisdom... cannot claim courage!" to quote Zelda.


Out of interest, which game is that? It makes sense from a symbolic perspective, but I'd still like to know the source.

Edited by Raian, 23 May 2008 - 07:12 PM.


#161 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:33 PM

According to Jumbie, in the Japanese games it's force in MC and it is force in PH. No difference.


Right, but until PH came out, this "force" was never said to be life force.

Nonetheless, some people speculate this is what happened to TP Link and Zelda.


Too bad, the Triforce doesn't work like that.

Also, am I really the only person to catch this? I thought this was common knowledge.

Dammit, the one time I make an uber contribution, and I'm too modest to care. Curse you, Alec Baldwin.

#162 NM87

NM87

    Crusader

  • Banned
  • 417 posts

Posted 23 May 2008 - 11:37 PM

Since someone has the Triforce, that means that it's split, so the other two pieces go to Zelda and Ganny ("divine prank," anyone?) Ganondorf doesn't take over Hyrule like in Adult OoT because he doesn't know that he's got the Triforce of Power (plus what I've already pointed out, with the whole Link's there and so are the Sages). The same is true of after he gets captured.


This stuff could also be justification for 'connections' to the Triforce, except 1)only Link would have the connection, and 2) it would be to the Adult Timeline Triforce.


1) It doesn’t mean Zelda and Ganon can’t have a connection, 2) The Adult Timeline Triforce is the same as the Child, so the connection would still be the same, even if he had been sent back.

This theory makes sense, because as I said in previous posts, Ganondorf not knowing that this power was the Triforce would justify his actions in TP. 1)"He doesn't go after the other two pieces" check. He doesn't know that he's got a piece (or maybe that others were granted this power. Maybe), so he would never have thought of it. 2) "He would have taken over Hyrule like in the adult OoT" I've already addressed. a) the sages overpowered him, and b) he didn't know the extent of the power(or perhaps even know of it altogether) until it revived him.


1) His ambitions were different then they were in OOT, 2) the power within him only awakens during the execution scene due to divine intervention.

Notice: I am not trying to disprove your theory, I was stating the opposite side to each claim…which has a much value as yours does. So we may never know the truth until future releases.

Of course, this is only necessary if Link was sent to a time before he met Zelda, (and thusly he wouldn't be the hero of the Gorons or Zoras) or at least right before he pulled the sword (he would be the hero, the door of time would be open, and Ganondorf never entered the Sacred Realm. Should Link go back anytime before he pulled the sword, right before makes the most sense.) As opposed to right after he pulled the sword like in the rest of the game, which works too, you just still have to explain the Ganondorf stuff, while this theory explains itself.


Hmmm…I see the pros of him being sent back right before pulling the sword. I am aptly inclined to begin believing this instead of right before meeting Zelda, since it seems to work better. Thank you for clearing that up for me. :]

#163 Hero of Legend

Hero of Legend

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 24 May 2008 - 06:22 AM

Because "He who depends on power alone, without wisdom... cannot claim courage!" to quote Zelda.


Out of interest, which game is that? It makes sense from a symbolic perspective, but I'd still like to know the source.

It's from a Nintendo Power cartoon where Link takes the ToP and turns into a pig or some crazy shit like that. I don't think Showsni intended to be taken seriously, but he still should have mentioned that.

Edited by Hero of Legend, 24 May 2008 - 06:51 AM.


#164 Duke Serkol

Duke Serkol

    Famicom

  • ZL Staff
  • 1,413 posts

Posted 24 May 2008 - 09:23 AM

Too bad, the Triforce doesn't work like that.

Funny that: it's what I've been saying about he ending of TP all along...

Edited by Duke Serkol, 24 May 2008 - 09:26 AM.


#165 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 May 2008 - 11:24 AM

Funny that: it's what I've been saying about he ending of TP all along...


The ending of TP is debatable, as it's a bit of a mess what's happening there. 1) We don't know what happens to the Triforce part of a Chosen when he dies with one in their body, 2) Some people theorize that in the lapse of time between the two ending scenes, the Triforce was reassembled and used (I find it silly, but hey), and 3) Atleast Ganondorf didn't freakin' turn into stone this time, goddammit. XP

#166 Showsni

Showsni

    The Fallen

  • Members
  • 13,386 posts
  • Location:Gloucester
  • Gender:Male
  • England

Posted 24 May 2008 - 03:46 PM

Because "He who depends on power alone, without wisdom... cannot claim courage!" to quote Zelda.


Out of interest, which game is that? It makes sense from a symbolic perspective, but I'd still like to know the source.

It's from a Nintendo Power cartoon where Link takes the ToP and turns into a pig or some crazy shit like that. I don't think Showsni intended to be taken seriously, but he still should have mentioned that.


That's what the alt text is for. The comics and cartoons, whilst interesting, have no real bearing on the timeline; they're more like another fan interpretation.


#167 Hero of Legend

Hero of Legend

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 24 May 2008 - 05:55 PM

Not everyone can see that hidden text - I certainly can't (I wasn’t aware of it until now). Using it in a serious debate only leads to confusion, and for what gain? At least find a way to warn us poor suckers whose browsers don’t notify us of it if you feel compelled to use it.

#168 Duke Serkol

Duke Serkol

    Famicom

  • ZL Staff
  • 1,413 posts

Posted 24 May 2008 - 06:17 PM

The ending of TP is debatable, as it's a bit of a mess what's happening there.

That statement is something I will always gladly drink to.

Some people theorize that in the lapse of time between the two ending scenes, the Triforce was reassembled and used (I find it silly, but hey)

Well if it was, I believe the people of Kakariko would not still be dead. They would have been brought back like those who died in ALttP. Furthermore, if they were about to obtain the Triforce, it wouldn't have been necessary for the Light Spirits to bother reviving Midna. Link or Zelda would have done it with the completed power of the gods (it could be done without using the word Triforce. I mean, if they could get away with the whole game not saying it...)

Atleast Ganondorf didn't freakin' turn into stone this time, goddammit. XP

And I'll drink to this too! *lol*

#169 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 May 2008 - 12:44 AM

Well if it was, I believe the people of Kakariko would not still be dead. They would have been brought back like those who died in ALttP. Furthermore, if they were about to obtain the Triforce, it wouldn't have been necessary for the Light Spirits to bother reviving Midna. Link or Zelda would have done it with the completed power of the gods (it could be done without using the word Triforce. I mean, if they could get away with the whole game not saying it...)


I totally agree. I just felt I should atleast throw it out there for fairness.

#170 Marty

Marty

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,241 posts
  • Location:Nottingham, UK
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 May 2008 - 02:38 PM

I have re-read all of the posts, played half-way through TP and WW again, read through many text dumps and I will now attempt to bring the topic back to its focus with what I view to be the main arguments for and against the following statement:

"The Triforce is not a part of the events of Twilight Princess"

Similarities and differences to the Triforce in previous games are crucial to both arguments, so I shall start by stating what I believe to be facts from each game:

LoZ - ToW in pieces and assembled. ToW needed to fight ToP. ToP dropped on defeat.
AoL - ToC hidden in palace. ToC gifted upon completion of trials. Triforce assembled to break spell.
ALttP - Triforce as one entity. Triforce kept in a seperate room. Capable of granting wishes.
LA - Triforce not in game
OoT - Triforce split when grabbed by unworthy. Favoured piece remains with claimant (ToP), other two are bestowed upon chosen ones.
MM - Triforce not in game
OoX - Triforce complete, sends Link on quests.
MC - Triforce not in game, however there is a hereditory Life force
WW - ToP with Ganondorf from OoT. ToW in two pieces, one piece with KoRL, one piece with Zelda bloodline. ToC in pieces and assembled. Triforce assembled and grants KoRL's wish, then disappears.
PH - Triforce not in game
FS/FSA - I have not played these
TP - subject of debate


Against:
1) Glowing hands - Similarity argument. The only previous games to include this feature are WW and OoT. In these games the characters are known to be in possession of their respective Triforce pieces.

Counterpoint - Midna does not gain a crest when she is in possession of "everything (Zelda) had to offer"

2) "Power of the Goddesses" - Similarity argument. Previous games (WW) have likened the Triforce to the "Power of the Goddesses".

Counterpoint - this statement is heavily emphasized in TP but the source of the power is never mentioned. The importance of this is discussed in For 1) below.

3) These powers are the same as previous games - Similarity argument. Ganondorf's powers are enhanced, Link has the ability to overcome any challange, and Zelda has sage-like awareness and healing powers.

Counterpoint - these are the same powers of any Link and Zelda, regardless of Triforce ownership. It is only the enhancement of Ganondorf's powers that has any exclusive similarity to the Triforce.


For:
1) the Triforce is not mentioned - this cannot be overlooked or downplayed. If the same statement as above were made about ALttP, OoT, WW, etc. that statement could be proved incorrect from sources within each of those respective games. However, the arguments against this statement for TP rely on sources from other games in the Zelda universe. This distinction should, at the very least, open our minds.

Counterpoint - the omitance of the word "Triforce" could have been to maintain focus of the story on the Twili.

2) Ganondorf's power fades before he dies - Difference point. Ganondorf's power abandons him before his death, and since the Triforce is affectively inaminate (ALttP) it could not leave Ganondorf of its own volition. This can only be attributed to an action by the Goddesses, an action they have not taken in previous games. Therefore it can be concluded (not proven) that these powers are direct blessings of the Goddesses as opposed to moving the triforce pieces around the cosmos to achieve the same result, an action that would require more effort.

Counterpoint - there is no previous example of a character dying whilst being host to a triforce piece, therefore the affect of this can only be speculated. Also, as mentioned, it can be argued that the Goddesses bestow and remove the triforce pieces at will.

3) "You who possess the crest of the Goddesses", Sages quote - note the word "crest", usually associated with 'chosen one'. This was a prime opportunity to mention the Triforce but the game didn't.

Counterpoint - the direct translation of the Japanase text may shed more light on this quote.

4) the "divine prank" - the Goddesses give Ganondorf his power during his execution. The mortal wound obtained shows that he would have broken free if he were previously capable. The power is either a direct blessing or the ToP has been teleported into his body.

Counterpoint - Ganondorf could have obtained the ToP previously and not had full use until he sustained the mortal wound, similar to the Ganon transformation in OoT.

Counter-counterpoint - the ToW would have gone to the pre-TP Zelda and the ToC to a different hero as the execution scene is in the past, and although no time reference is given it is generally accepted as being far enough in the past to predate TP-Link & Zelda's births. Therefore an explanation must be given as to where they got their triforce pieces. Whilst Zelda could have had hers passed down, Link's piece remains a mystery. Also, the following quote is from Zelda to Link: "Like you, I have been granted special powers by the Goddesses". Note the word 'granted', not 'passed down'.


I believe I have summarized the main points of both arguments. Neither argument is conclusive, however I think I have shown that there are only two possibilities:

1 - The Goddesses give their direct blessings to the characters in the game

2 - The Goddesses give the triforce pieces directly to the characters in the game

When presented like this, I subscribe to the former as the latter just seems like an odd way for the Goddesses to achieve the same result, and the only previous example of this type of bestowment was when the Triforce was touched by an imbalanced character (OoT).

Edited by Marty, 26 May 2008 - 02:41 PM.


#171 NM87

NM87

    Crusader

  • Banned
  • 417 posts

Posted 26 May 2008 - 03:47 PM

That was one of the greatest things I have ever read Marty, excellent job!

After reading, I think the evidence is heavily in favor of:

1 - The Goddesses give their direct blessings to the characters in the game


All arguments for it are supported by in-game mechanics while all arguments against it are for the sake of "similarity". Maybe we should focus on TP rather than having its elements fit better with other games, since Nintendo values the individual stories of the games rather than their bearing on the whole of Zelda.

Edit: The post below this one, is yet again, comparing elements in TP (designed for TP) to elements from other Zelda games (designed for those games). Only over-arching themes can be applied to all Zelda games.

Edited by NM87, 27 May 2008 - 12:05 AM.


#172 LionHarted

LionHarted

    Quirky.

  • Members
  • 2,029 posts

Posted 26 May 2008 - 05:33 PM

1) Glowing hands - Similarity argument. The only previous games to include this feature are WW and OoT. In these games the characters are known to be in possession of their respective Triforce pieces.

Counterpoint - Midna does not gain a crest when she is in possession of "everything (Zelda) had to offer"

2) "Power of the Goddesses" - Similarity argument. Previous games (WW) have likened the Triforce to the "Power of the Goddesses".

Counterpoint - this statement is heavily emphasized in TP but the source of the power is never mentioned. The importance of this is discussed in For 1) below.

3) These powers are the same as previous games - Similarity argument. Ganondorf's powers are enhanced, Link has the ability to overcome any challange, and Zelda has sage-like awareness and healing powers.

Counterpoint - these are the same powers of any Link and Zelda, regardless of Triforce ownership. It is only the enhancement of Ganondorf's powers that has any exclusive similarity to the Triforce.


As a matter of argument...

1) Actually, a glowing crest appears in AoL and OoX, as well, but is unconnected to possession of Triforce pieces. It does, however, appear to be connected to fated possession of Triforce pieces. As for the counterargument, only the chosen wielders are said to be the ones to have marks, so it should come as no surprise that Midna has no mark.

2) The "power of the gods" is referenced in only two veins: (1) as the power given to the ones with the crests, (2) as the power chosen that used to slumber somewhere in Hyrule. Clearly outside sources tell us that both 1 and 2 are the Triforce, but 2 cannot possibly be anything else. Your counterpoint therefore falls immediately.

3) Ganon lacks any of his alternate sources of power, at least one of which he needs to overcome the power of light and spread darkness in other games. Only the Triforce and the Trident have been shown to grant him this level of power. Given 2, the likelihood of Ganon having the Triforce is fairly strong. Given the precedent for overcoming light, this likelihood increases.

1) the Triforce is not mentioned - this cannot be overlooked or downplayed. If the same statement as above were made about ALttP, OoT, WW, etc. that statement could be proved incorrect from sources within each of those respective games. However, the arguments against this statement for TP rely on sources from other games in the Zelda universe. This distinction should, at the very least, open our minds.


The Triforce is not mentioned by name, but it is referenced by its various titles ("power of the gods", "chosen power of the goddesses", "power of the chosen one").

2) Ganondorf's power fades before he dies - Difference point. Ganondorf's power abandons him before his death, and since the Triforce is affectively inaminate (ALttP) it could not leave Ganondorf of its own volition. This can only be attributed to an action by the Goddesses, an action they have not taken in previous games. Therefore it can be concluded (not proven) that these powers are direct blessings of the Goddesses as opposed to moving the triforce pieces around the cosmos to achieve the same result, an action that would require more effort.

Counterpoint - there is no previous example of a character dying whilst being host to a triforce piece, therefore the affect of this can only be speculated. Also, as mentioned, it can be argued that the Goddesses bestow and remove the triforce pieces at will.


The Master Sword repels demonic powers, and this would presumably include Ganondorf's power to thwart death.

As for your concluding points, there is no reason why "chosen ones" should mean anything it does not in OoT, since the same term is applied to Link and Zelda in OoT as well.

#173 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 26 May 2008 - 05:42 PM

2) The "power of the gods" is referenced in only two veins: (1) as the power given to the ones with the crests, (2) as the power chosen that used to slumber somewhere in Hyrule. Clearly outside sources tell us that both 1 and 2 are the Triforce, but 2 cannot possibly be anything else. Your counterpoint therefore falls immediately.


You forgot (3) the Wind Waker. What this shows is that "power of the gods" is a description, not a title.

As for your concluding points, there is no reason why "chosen ones" should mean anything it does not in OoT, since the same term is applied to Link and Zelda in OoT as well.


Wouldn't it be more accurate to look at the actual meaning of the term "chosen ones" in TP and not just apply past references willy-nilly because it happens to suit your theory? Being "chosen" does not in itself define the purpose for which they were chosen, or the consequences of being chosen, so logically that additional context must come from TP, not OoT.

Edited by Raian, 26 May 2008 - 05:43 PM.


#174 Marty

Marty

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,241 posts
  • Location:Nottingham, UK
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 May 2008 - 06:19 PM

1) Actually, a glowing crest appears in AoL and OoX, as well, but is unconnected to possession of Triforce pieces. It does, however, appear to be connected to fated possession of Triforce pieces. As for the counterargument, only the chosen wielders are said to be the ones to have marks, so it should come as no surprise that Midna has no mark.


I checked the manual, the crest doesn't glow in AoL. As for OoX, I can't think of any example where the crest glows. If you know of one then please share.

As for the counter-argument, this is a point we disagree on. I'd like to see the quote for the chosen wielders before I revise my triforce & crest rules.

2) The "power of the gods" is referenced in only two veins: (1) as the power given to the ones with the crests, (2) as the power chosen that used to slumber somewhere in Hyrule. Clearly outside sources tell us that both 1 and 2 are the Triforce, but 2 cannot possibly be anything else. Your counterpoint therefore falls immediately.


Are these references in-game or external to TP? If they are external than the counter-point still stands.

3) Ganon lacks any of his alternate sources of power, at least one of which he needs to overcome the power of light and spread darkness in other games. Only the Triforce and the Trident have been shown to grant him this level of power. Given 2, the likelihood of Ganon having the Triforce is fairly strong. Given the precedent for overcoming light, this likelihood increases.


I accept this as a new argument against my statement. However, the 'for' argument I presented was similar power granted directly by the Goddesses, so there would be no need for the Triforce or Trident.

#175 LionHarted

LionHarted

    Quirky.

  • Members
  • 2,029 posts

Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:09 AM

You forgot (3) the Wind Waker.


Which is totally in Twilight Princess.

What this shows is that "power of the gods" is a description


The "power of the gods" that was said to slumber in Hyrule is and can only be the Triforce.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to look at the actual meaning of the term "chosen ones" in TP and not just apply past references willy-nilly because it happens to suit your theory?


The actual meaning of the term "chosen ones" is no different than before!

However, the 'for' argument I presented was similar power granted directly by the Goddesses


The goddesses granted power to all. >_>

Edited by LionHarted, 27 May 2008 - 02:11 AM.


#176 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 27 May 2008 - 07:12 AM

The "power of the gods" that was said to slumber in Hyrule is and can only be the Triforce.


And what said in Twilight Princess? (LOL, selective referencing)

The actual meaning of the term "chosen ones" is no different than before!


But the additional context that defines the purpose and consequence of being "chosen" is different than before.

Edited by Raian, 27 May 2008 - 07:25 AM.


#177 LionHarted

LionHarted

    Quirky.

  • Members
  • 2,029 posts

Posted 27 May 2008 - 01:35 PM

But the additional context that defines the purpose and consequence of being "chosen" is more elaborate than before.


Fix'd.

#178 NM87

NM87

    Crusader

  • Banned
  • 417 posts

Posted 27 May 2008 - 03:05 PM

But the additional context that defines the purpose and consequence of being "chosen" is more elaborate than before.


Fix'd.

No its not. In OOT Link and Zelda were chosen because of Ganondorf touching the Triforce. In TP, they were all equally chosen for no apparent reason. In OOX/AOL, Link was chosen to be the hero, nothing else.

#179 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 27 May 2008 - 04:52 PM

But the additional context that defines the purpose and consequence of being "chosen" is more elaborate than before.


Fix'd.


So you're saying that the act of being chosen defines the consequence of being chosen, and vice versa? The chosen always possess the Triforce, and thus bearers of the Triforce will always be chosen? That's a very inaccurate observation. Why is Ganondorf said to be chosen in TP, but not in OoT? The only difference is that divine intervention gave Ganondorf his power in TP. In fact, that's the answer. Whenever someone is said to be "chosen", it is because the goddesses labelled them as "chosen" through their own intervening actions. It was known that TP Link was "chosen", for example, because he was given the form of the divine beast.

Interestingly, what defines the context in which someone is "chosen" also defines the context in which "destiny" is said to occur. Destiny has always been a tool to guide the "chosen" and to make things happen when they otherwise would not (like the divine beast).

Edited by Raian, 27 May 2008 - 05:58 PM.


#180 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 May 2008 - 05:41 PM

I have re-read all of the posts, played half-way through TP and WW again, read through many text dumps and I will now attempt to bring the topic back to its focus with what I view to be the main arguments for and against the following statement:


Edit: I'm not trying to "cover up" the fact that I was rude before, but I am editing this part out simply because I'm ashamed that I was that rude to someone unprovoked. People have quoted what I said so anyone who shows up afterwards can still be aware of what went on.

Against:
1) Glowing hands - Similarity argument. The only previous games to include this feature are WW and OoT. In these games the characters are known to be in possession of their respective Triforce pieces.

Counterpoint - Midna does not gain a crest when she is in possession of "everything (Zelda) had to offer"


Looking for "similarities" is what a good theorist would do. Lionharted answered the "counterpoint" well enough.

2) "Power of the Goddesses" - Similarity argument. Previous games (WW) have likened the Triforce to the "Power of the Goddesses".

Counterpoint - this statement is heavily emphasized in TP but the source of the power is never mentioned. The importance of this is discussed in For 1) below.


The source of this power isn't mentioned because it doesn't need to be. You can figure it out through common sense and/or a knowledge of the other games. If you, Raian and NM don't believe we should use other games in theorizing then you shouldn't expect anyone to really agree with any of your theories. Realize that's what theorists have always done.

3) These powers are the same as previous games - Similarity argument. Ganondorf's powers are enhanced, Link has the ability to overcome any challange, and Zelda has sage-like awareness and healing powers.

Counterpoint - these are the same powers of any Link and Zelda, regardless of Triforce ownership. It is only the enhancement of Ganondorf's powers that has any exclusive similarity to the Triforce.


That's not really a counterpoint, though. I've yet to see anyone say that Link and Zelda only are the way they are because they have the Triforce pieces.

For:
1) the Triforce is not mentioned - this cannot be overlooked or downplayed. If the same statement as above were made about ALttP, OoT, WW, etc. that statement could be proved incorrect from sources within each of those respective games. However, the arguments against this statement for TP rely on sources from other games in the Zelda universe. This distinction should, at the very least, open our minds.


Yes, it can and should be overlooked because it's a common element in story telling. The game not saying "Triforce" doesn't change the fact that A) We are told that other people have had the very same "power of the gods" before, and that in OoT the power of the gods they had WAS the Triforce and B ) That the "power of the gods" is referred to as having "once slumbered" in Hyrule, further proving their is no distinction between the "power of the gods" in other games and the "power of the gods" in this game. The fact is, omitting a phrase isn't same as distinguishing what that phrase refers to from something else.

2) Ganondorf's power fades before he dies - Difference point. Ganondorf's power abandons him before his death, and since the Triforce is affectively inaminate (ALttP) it could not leave Ganondorf of its own volition. This can only be attributed to an action by the Goddesses, an action they have not taken in previous games. Therefore it can be concluded (not proven) that these powers are direct blessings of the Goddesses as opposed to moving the triforce pieces around the cosmos to achieve the same result, an action that would require more effort.

Counterpoint - there is no previous example of a character dying whilst being host to a triforce piece, therefore the affect of this can only be speculated. Also, as mentioned, it can be argued that the Goddesses bestow and remove the triforce pieces at will.


I'd like to add to the counterpoint that this supposed "difference" doesn't mean anything beyond the fact that this game had a different style than other games. It's funny that some of the same people who argue that the Triforce isn't in TP also argue that every mention of "force" in FSA, TMC, and PH is referring to the same thing, that Hyrule is the same and in every game, and that the Twilight Mirror is the same thing as the Dark Mirror. Pray tell, what is the difference between these things? And why aren't other things held to the same rule? If the Triforce isn't in Tp, then the Four Sword of TMC and ALttP isn't the one from the other games and the Master Sword of TWW isn't the one from OoT, ALttP, or TP.

4) the "divine prank" - the Goddesses give Ganondorf his power during his execution. The mortal wound obtained shows that he would have broken free if he were previously capable. The power is either a direct blessing or the ToP has been teleported into his body.

Counterpoint - Ganondorf could have obtained the ToP previously and not had full use until he sustained the mortal wound, similar to the Ganon transformation in OoT.

Counter-counterpoint - the ToW would have gone to the pre-TP Zelda and the ToC to a different hero as the execution scene is in the past, and although no time reference is given it is generally accepted as being far enough in the past to predate TP-Link & Zelda's births. Therefore an explanation must be given as to where they got their triforce pieces. Whilst Zelda could have had hers passed down, Link's piece remains a mystery. Also, the following quote is from Zelda to Link: "Like you, I have been granted special powers by the Goddesses". Note the word 'granted', not 'passed down'.


Much the way Link was bestowed the power of the gods/Triforce in TWW, right? Oh wait...

I believe I have summarized the main points of both arguments.


Disingenously, and with loads of bias, but yes.

Neither argument is conclusive, however I think I have shown that there are only two possibilities:

1 - The Goddesses give their direct blessings to the characters in the game

2 - The Goddesses give the triforce pieces directly to the characters in the game


No, you haven't shown that in fact, not at all. Maybe you have "proven" it to the people who already believed it to be the case, but not anyone else. Sorry, thanks for playing, I'm going to play SSBB.

Edited by Fierce Deity Link, 28 May 2008 - 09:56 AM.





Copyright © 2025 Zelda Legends