Jump to content

IPBoard Styles©Fisana

Photo

In Communist Hylia, The Song of Storms Plays You


  • Please log in to reply
320 replies to this topic

#211 Vertiboy

Vertiboy

    Crusader

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 06:03 PM

Ganondorf not having complete control over the Triforce of Power isn't made up. it gives him power, but he doesn't have complete control of it. That's pretty much what Zelda says, and that isn't made up. If we accept what Zelda said as canon, it follows that seven years earlier he was even less adept with that power, and he was also arrogant enough to fall for a trap and end up in chains (despite being powerful enough to beat the Sages in a fair fight.) The Sages, despite being able to subdue him thanks to his arrogance and their cunning, are not powerful enough to kill him and the rest unfolds as we see.

There is a difference between having complete control and using maximum power. An AK-47 is as harmful in the hands of a novice as it is in the hands of an expert. An expert will just have more control, so it is more deadly in the hands of the expert.

The same applies to the Triforce of Power. Even though Ganondorf didn't have complete control over the ToP, that doesn't mean he wasn't using all of it's power. Had Ganondorf complete control and the maximum power of the Triforce, it would have been more chaotic.

The fact of the matter is that if Ganondorf knew how to control the ToP enough to use it to take control of Hyrule, what do you think that the odds are he could use it to avoid arrest?

Did you even read what you were replying to? "However, I'm more inclined to believe they did know and they just believed nothing would happen." He was saying that they overestimated their abilities and thought they could kill Ganondorf despite having the Triforce of Power, not that the Sages didn't know Ganondorf had the Triforce of Power.

So you think that the Sages were idiots?

You are saying that in your theory, the Sages had an evil man with the power of the gods in their custody who tried to take control of the Sacred Realm, and they assumed that when they captured him, he would think, "Well, I had a good run. I could escape if I wanted to, but I guess that I deserve this punishment. There is absolutely no chance that I would use the power of the gods to escape because all of my ambitions of taking control of the world are gone."

WTF?

That is an irrational assumption. Very irrational. If the Sages assumed that Ganondorf would just lose all ambitions, accept his punishment, and not use his power to escape, then they would be idiots. Sage =/= Dumb Man. Sage = Wise Man.

That is not even close to being a possibility, unless irrational ideas are fair game.

Besides, that still doesn't explain the WTF look on the Sages' face. Why would it surprise them that he used the power of the gods to escape?

Is that so? Let's take a moment to discuss a hypothetical situation (please note that I'm not being patronizing or anything like that if that's the way you read this.) Say you're a bully who decides to beat up this kid named... Chuck. Actually, let's say you're in a gang of six bullies that decide to beat up Chuck. Anyway, when you try to beat up Chuck he whips out a metal bat and starts beating you all into submission. You had no idea he had the bat, so did you really overestimate your abilities? In my opinion, no. The six of you clearly would have been able to beat him up if he hadn't had that bat, but since he did you all got beat up. Now if you knew Chuck had the bat and still tried to beat him up, then we might say you overestimated your abilities

Some people might use that phrase differently, though. Some people might say that I overestimated my ability even if I didn't know Chuck (Norris?) had the bat.

Besides, we are splitting hairs on the English translation of the game. We don't know what kind of context that phrase can be used in when speaking in Japanese (in that culture, as well).

Being aware he has the Triforce of Power may make him more powerful, but it will also make him more arrogant. And we're not saying the Sages had enough power to do what they did in the adult timeline, we're simply saying that he walked into a trap which got him chained up, then the Triforce helped him escape his chains and kill one of them. We're only saying that the Sages had the power (their wisdom and his arrogance helped) to temporarily subdue him. He wasn't defeated, just temporarily captured.


That leaves us with more questions. How long was Ganondorf chained up before he was moved to the Desert Colossus? Was the trap set in the DC? Why wouldn't Ganondorf be able to break free when being transported to the DC? Would it even be possible to trap Ganondorf with chains when he has the ToP?

Or he just wasn't able to draw enough power from the Triforce to escape before desperation kicked in.

Was he in desparation when he used the ToP to take control of Hyrule? It may not have been the same kind of desparation. He may have just been desparate for Hyrule. In that case, he has probably always been desparate for Hyrule, meaning that he could always access the power to take control of Hyrule with the ToP ever since he obtained it.

Taking control of a kingdom > Escaping chains

If I had to guess, and this is complete fan fiction, it would probably take a little ([/understatement]) more power to take control of a kingdom than it would to break free of chains. If Ganondorf can muster up enough power to take control of a kingdom, then he can probably just as easily draw up enough power to break free of chains.

Has anyone looked at the possibility that Zelda was referring to the WHOLE Triforce when she said that Ganondorf could not control it without a strong, righteous mind (aka, a balanced heart)?

I thought that was a possibility.

No, he has to figure out how to, or have a "righteous mind" or whatever.

Did he have a "righteous mind" when he transformed into Ganon? Besides, where does it say that one has to learn how to use the Triforce?

Evidence says he wouldn't immediately have it's power. Nothing ever says the Triforce crests immediately do something like that, and Link's situation proves it. It may amplify your power but it doesn't neccesarily do it the way you say, which is immediately allow it's bearer it's full power. Again, Link proves this.

What do you mean Link's situation? Link in OoT or TP? Or another Link?
There is no proof in OoT that the Triforce of Courage ever helped him to defeat Ganon. He just had it.

In TP, Link wasn't aware that he had the ToC. It transforms him into a wolf in the TR instead of turning him into a spirit (not to be confused with Zant's crystal that is obtained later in the game). Link did not consciously choose to turn into a wolf, yet he did anyway.

What Link are you talking about, exactly?

I don't know what you want me to say. You really aren't proving anything with this point.

If Link told Zelda about what Ganondorf did in the adult timeline, he would be sure to mention that Ganondorf has the ToP. Link and Zelda would tell the king/Sages, and they would rationally tell him/them that Ganondorf has the ToP. The Sages should be aware that he has the ToP. They should know that it is powerful, and that he has the capability to escape mere chains. They shouldn't have a WTF look? They do, though. They are surprised that he has the ToP. They are surprised that he breaks free of the chains.

If Link arrives before his adventure begins, however, his story would be different. He would say that in the adult timeline, Ganondorf got the ToP because they tried to stop him from getting it. He would say, however, that Ganondorf hasn't entered the SR yet, and it is not too late to stop him from doing so. They decide to leave Ganondorf alone, so they do not assume that he has the ToP. Years later, when Ganondorf attacks HC, he is arrested because HC was suspiscious of him due to Link's story. They are ready for his attack. They chain him up, and attempt to execute him. Then, through divine intervention, a way to get the Triforce that was unheard of, Ganondorf gets the ToP. The Sages are surprised because they did not know he had the ToP. He may not have had it until that moment. The fact of the matter is, though, that Ganondorf got the ToP in an unknown way (probably divine intervention), which is why they wouldn't suspect that he had (or would get) it.

Basically, my point is that the reaction of the Sages shows that they didn't know Ganondorf had the ToP. In your theory, it is irrational to think that they wouldn't know, but in my theory, it is rational to think that they wouldn't know.

Um, you said the gods gave it to Ganondorf through divine intervention at that time. If he's given it then, that's not an underestimation and these whacked out explanations are overthinking it more than I am. Divine intervention=/=under/overestimation, no matter how you slice it. Let me give an example. Two armies are battling one another, let's call them Green and Red. Green has destroyed all but three of Red's soldiers. Suddenly, lightning comes down and destroys the entire Green Army. They were not overestimating their strength at all. Same deal here.

The Sages have no idea how or when Ganondorf got the ToP. As far as they know, he could have had it way before they captured him. That is why the Sages would think that they overestimated their ability. They thought that they had the ability to take care of Ganondorf. They did not. They were wrong. That means that they overestimated their ability.

Besides, Ganondorf got the ToP, and he used it to break free. The Red Army didn't use the lightning to defeat the Green Army. I know that this wouldn't happen, but Ganondorf had a choice when he got the ToP. He could either use it to escape, or he could stay there and take his punishment. (Obviously, he wouldn't choose the later.) Even though being evil is a part of Ganondorf's character, he still had a choice. Did the Red Army choose for the lightning to come down? No. The Red Army had no choice in the matter. That is the difference.

Okay, then you're arguing that he got it at that time. See above for some argument against that.

Also look above.

No, you're generalizing far too much. There are few similarities between the sealing and the execution, aside from the fact that sages are involved. And Zelda existing is waaayyyy different than Zelda being recognized as a sage and leading the others. The fact that she exists in the child timeline doesn;t mean she can lead them. And then there's the fact that the sages are in the SR in OoT, and CANNOT LEAVE. Pretty much every sage tells Link this in OoT.

They can't leave? Then why do they all appear to Link in Ganon's Castle after he breaks a barrier? Why do they appear at the top of Death Mountain at the end of the game? I am 1,000,000% sure that the Sages can leave the SR. :)

Zelda was not in the SR. She was present for the battle. After Ganon was significantly weakened, she used her power to hold him down so Link could deliver the final blow, which would give the other Sages enough time to seal him in the SR. She could not hold him down until he was weakened.

As for the similarities, the Sages, Ganon, the ToP, and sealing Ganon in another realm are all similarities. If you say that there are few similarities between the two scenes, you didn't play OoT or TP, you got ripped off, and you should go get your money back.

Let me set up a new scenario. When Ganondorf transforms into Ganon, if what you are saying is true, the 7 Sages (they can leave the SR, it is a fact) could just hold Ganon down for Link to slice with the Master Sword. They wouldn't wait for Link to weaken him. They could just hold him still (or subdue him), then transfer him to the SR. They don't do that, though.

That is what some have been suggesting about Ganondorf's arrest. They suggest that the Sages have the magical ability to subdue Ganondorf, even though he has the ToP. They didn't do it in OoT when they clearly had an opportunity and would have clearly made things easier, so why would they be able to do it to arrest Ganondorf? They couldn't.

See above.

He probably didn't have the ToP when he stabbed him. If he had it earlier, he would probably use it to escape and take over Hyrule again. The cycle starts again. Hyrule loses. It makes the most sense for him to at least be aware that he has it during the execution scene.

Being aware that you have something doesn't mean you can use it. I mean, Link has the ToC and is aware he has it and yet he still appears to be surprised when it does something for him like heals him towards the end of OoT.

That is the only good that the ToC ever did Link in OoT. It wasn't really useful to him until that point. He just carried it around. He didn't use it until because he didn't have the opportunity. He didn't conscously make an effort to heal with it, either. He knew he had it, but he was still surprised that it helped him to heal.

Besides, you are just saying that he couldn't use it to fit the theory, when you should be using the evidence to make the theory itself, like I have. I don't form a theory and then see if I can fit it into the canon. I come to the best conclusion with the fewest plotholes based on the evidence, then I try to explain the plotholes.

We've had this discussion on another thread, but there is such a thing as a default assumption. There are sometimes two options that cannot be proven wrong or right, but one of them is right. This is an example that we use all the time. People can either lie or tell the truth. Usually we assume that the people on the Zelda game are telling the truth. We trust that Tingle is 35 on MM, and not 25. We trust that Link went forward in time 7 years and not 10. Even though there is no statement made by these characters saying, "I swear! I am being 100% honest!" we assume that they are telling the truth.

This applies to this situation. Either Ganondorf could or could not access the ToP's power when he first obtained it. This is just my opinion, but I think that he could access its power. When one makes a wish on the Triforce, like Link at the end of ALttP or the King of Hyrule at the end of TWW, it doesn't seem to stall for a long period of time. The wish is nearly instantly granted. The Great Sea is completely flooded only moments after the battle with Ganondorf. I would like to think that the individual crest behave the same way. Even though they don't grant wishes, they still have power. I would like to think that the power doesn't stall for very long before the crest bearer has access to it. Maybe the person doesn't have access to its power the very moment of obtaining it, but the point is that there wouldn't be enough time between Ganondorf obtaining the ToP and him having access to its power for the Sages/soldiers to subdue Ganondorf.

#212 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 11 May 2007 - 06:52 PM

REPEAT

Has anyone considered the possibility that Zelda was referring to the WHOLE Triforce when she said that Ganondorf could not control it without a strong, righteous mind (aka, a balanced heart)? Why are we assuming that it has to be the Triforce of Power?

#213 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 May 2007 - 07:34 PM

There is a difference between having complete control and using maximum power. An AK-47 is as harmful in the hands of a novice as it is in the hands of an expert. An expert will just have more control, so it is more deadly in the hands of the expert.

The same applies to the Triforce of Power. Even though Ganondorf didn't have complete control over the ToP, that doesn't mean he wasn't using all of it's power. Had Ganondorf complete control and the maximum power of the Triforce, it would have been more chaotic.

The fact of the matter is that if Ganondorf knew how to control the ToP enough to use it to take control of Hyrule, what do you think that the odds are he could use it to avoid arrest?


Dude, that's you're assumption. We don't know what the ToP can do, and we DO know that it doesn't give Ganondorf it's full power right away, as evidenced by Zelda's quote, the fact that Link doesn't really use any insane new powers when he has the ToC, and Ganondorf not being able to transform until he's near death, among other things. Comparitively, no indication is given that immediately power is given. Plus, the fact that Hyrule Castle surrenders "a short time later" rather than has a long war with Ganondorf makes me think he didn't totally annihilate everyone, they were just stupid and felt hopeless and thus gave up rather easily.

So you think that the Sages were idiots?

You are saying that in your theory, the Sages had an evil man with the power of the gods in their custody who tried to take control of the Sacred Realm, and they assumed that when they captured him, he would think, "Well, I had a good run. I could escape if I wanted to, but I guess that I deserve this punishment. There is absolutely no chance that I would use the power of the gods to escape because all of my ambitions of taking control of the world are gone."

WTF?

That is an irrational assumption. Very irrational. If the Sages assumed that Ganondorf would just lose all ambitions, accept his punishment, and not use his power to escape, then they would be idiots. Sage =/= Dumb Man. Sage = Wise Man.

That is not even close to being a possibility, unless irrational ideas are fair game.


You're really not making any good points with this, because I never, ever said that. What I said was, he was unable to escape, just as he was unable to defeat Link in human form in OoT. What did he do then? A desperation move, that's what. He didn't use the ToP then, just as he didn't now. Couldn't he have immediately turned into Ganon and just thrown Link off the tower? No, because he couldn't. It's the same thing in TP, I'd go so far as to say he was turning into Ganon when he was thrown into the TR.

Besides, that still doesn't explain the WTF look on the Sages' face. Why would it surprise them that he used the power of the gods to escape?

See above. They had just stabbed him in the chest and they didn't know that the Triforce could do that. Why were Zelda and Link surprised when Ganondorf survived being crushed by his tower?

Some people might use that phrase differently, though. Some people might say that I overestimated my ability even if I didn't know Chuck (Norris?) had the bat.


Um, isn't that basically what I'm saying? They didn't know the true power of the crest, and thus they overestimated their abilities because they believed they were better. What you are arguing is more similar to if I beat the crap out of someone and was suddenly shot by someone who had just shown up. I didn;t think I was bullet proof, I was winning until someone intervened, and I wasn't being arrogant.

Besides, we are splitting hairs on the English translation of the game. We don't know what kind of context that phrase can be used in when speaking in Japanese (in that culture, as well).

Why would you argue translation when you don't even have a clue if that's the case? For all we know, all of your evidence is used differently. But I'm not going to use that as an argument, because it's a horribly stupid argument to make.

That leaves us with more questions. How long was Ganondorf chained up before he was moved to the Desert Colossus? Was the trap set in the DC? Why wouldn't Ganondorf be able to break free when being transported to the DC? Would it even be possible to trap Ganondorf with chains when he has the ToP?


The DC was his hideout back then. But I don't see how your questions really have anything to do with this argument.

Was he in desparation when he used the ToP to take control of Hyrule? It may not have been the same kind of desparation. He may have just been desparate for Hyrule. In that case, he has probably always been desparate for Hyrule, meaning that he could always access the power to take control of Hyrule with the ToP ever since he obtained it.

Taking control of a kingdom > Escaping chains

If I had to guess, and this is complete fan fiction, it would probably take a little ([/understatement]) more power to take control of a kingdom than it would to break free of chains. If Ganondorf can muster up enough power to take control of a kingdom, then he can probably just as easily draw up enough power to break free of chains.


That's incredibly foolish and simplistic. We have absolutely no clue how that power allowed him to take over Hyrule. Oh wait, I forgot, the Kingship of Hyrule is decided anually by a chain pulling contest.

Did he have a "righteous mind" when he transformed into Ganon? Besides, where does it say that one has to learn how to use the Triforce?


I'm saying we're shown that you don't immediately gain all the power of the crest, and it is known to save it's bearer from danger. Those are two inescapable parts of canon.


I'll address whatever you ask, but I'm not addressing the rest of your post for now. You basically ask me the same shit I've responded to, either now or in another post.

Edited by Fierce Deity Link, 11 May 2007 - 07:34 PM.


#214 BourgeoisJerry

BourgeoisJerry

    Apprentice

  • Members
  • 118 posts

Posted 12 May 2007 - 02:54 AM

It seems your main deal is that the Sages have a surprised expression on their faces when Ganondorf broke his chains, meaning the absolutely could not have known he had the Triforce of Power, because if they did they would have known how powerful he was and known they had no hope of defeating him... Well, unless they overestimated-- wait, don't they admit to overestimating their abilities? "We overestimated our abilities as sages and attempted to put an end to Ganondorf's evil magic..." Ah, but the Sages believing they had defeated Ganon "is not even close to being a possibility, unless irrational ideas are fair game." Well, actually, you say that about the Sages believing Ganondorf would lose ambition or something like that that we weren't claiming. I suppose I'll apply that statement to what we are claiming though, which is that the Sages believed they could defeat Ganondorf despite having the Triforce of Power, and were surprised when he broke his chains after being stabbed and killed one of them. This theory explains the lack of surprise on Ganondorf's face when this happens.

As for the whole deal with not being able to access the Triforce of Power's full power right from the start, I've gotta ask if you've ever picked up an instrument and tried to play it. Technically, you've got everything you need to play any song you can think of right there, but it's going to take years of practice before you can play any particularly complicated songs with it. There's no time release, but you're making much better music seven years after you pick the instrument up (even if you haven't completely mastered it) than you are seven days after you pick it up. Okay, so I guess Zelda's statement isn't proof that he can't completely control the Triforce of Power, but Ganondorf does get more powerful as desperation kicks in in Ocarina of Time, so is it impossible that it's the same way in the execution scene which most likely takes place at a time when he has less experience with the Triforce of Power?

Edited by BourgeoisJerry, 12 May 2007 - 02:57 AM.


#215 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 May 2007 - 10:51 AM

Yeah, that's a good point. If a surprised expression on the sages faces is what makes it impossible that he already had it, how do we explain the fact that Ganondorf clearly wasn't surprised? There are other reasons why the sages could be surprised, but Ganondorf's lack of surprise seems less explain-away-able.

#216 Vertiboy

Vertiboy

    Crusader

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 12 May 2007 - 02:59 PM

Yeah, that's a good point. If a surprised expression on the sages faces is what makes it impossible that he already had it, how do we explain the fact that Ganondorf clearly wasn't surprised? There are other reasons why the sages could be surprised, but Ganondorf's lack of surprise seems less explain-away-able.

There is no look of surprise on Link's face in Twilight Princess when he finds out that he has the Triforce of Courage. He is surprised to find that he is the chosen hero, but no surprise that he carries the crest of the gods. Just because one discovers that one has a Triforce, that doesn't mean one will be surprised.

Discovering that you carry a Triforce =/= Surprise

That is a fact.

That was all I wanted to respond to because of the following message.

It should be clear to everyone that this debate is going nowhere. We keep on bringing up more questions to explain the questions the plotholes bring up, then more questions still. While I have no idea what everyone has written since my last post, I am sure that it is as great as usual (seriously, I am not being sarcastic). Don't get me wrong. I am having fun debating. If I wasn't, I would just leave this debate without any warning. Anyway, I want to make one final comment on this matter before I end my involvement with this thread (for this reason at least; plus, if I get bored with the other debates, I may always feel like revisiting this one).

When I choose from a group of theories, I look at the plotholes involved in thsoe theories. My definition of a plothole is an idea that cannot canonically be explained through direct, implied, or rational information, which doesn't lead to another series of plotholes. In my theory, the open Door of Time is a plothole. In your theory, how Link gets into Hyrule Castle is a plothole. We may be able to find ways around those plotholes, but then it leads to even more plotholes, and more, and more, etc. I choose the theory with the least plotholes.

In this case, Link arriving before he met Zelda, and possibly before his adventure began, has less plotholes. The Door of Time is the only plothole. There is no canon explaination that is direct, implied, or rational that it should be open.

Before, I thought that having the Triforce of Courage and Hylian Shield was somewhat of a plothole because I could not prove that the same laws applied as those in Majora's Mask. I then remembered that in Ocarina of Time, items obtained in the future can be used in the past, as well, like Heart Containers, the Golden Scale, some spells, and possibly more. It is perfectly rational to assume that a time travel law from OoT applies to OoT's ending. The fact that Link has items obtained from a time that doesn't even exist anymore is not a plothole. Saying that it is means that you are directly denying canon.

How did Link get into Hyrule Castle after arriving in his childhood? Why is Zelda in HC after the attack? Why didn't the Sages know Ganondorf had the Triforce of Power when they logically should have known? Why did the Sages restrain Ganondorf with mere chains if they did know he had the ToP? How did the Hylian Royal Family/Sages subdue a ToP wielding Ganondorf when they clearly failed to do so in the adult timeline? Those are all plotholes that cannot be answered without creating more plotholes, and then more on top of those. If it was simple to answer them, then why would I have more plotholes in response to your solutions for those plotholes? You cannot canonically answer those questions directly, indirectly, or rationally. You can try all you like, but it cannot be done. You know that, even if you won't admit that you do. I know when I can't canonically explain a plothole, which is why I have no trouble admitting that the DoT is a plothole, ending any futile debating in advance.

That is why I am so confident that I have chosen the correct theory. There is one plothole. In some cases when its theory vs. theory, and they have about an equal number of plotholes, I can see why the winner may be ambiguous. In this case, however, it is one plothole vs. several plotholes. In cases like this, the correct theory is painfully obvious.

I am sorry if I came off as rude. I wasn't trying to do so. I am just saying that I see no point in debating this matter. You answer one plothole, but then create another one or two plotholes with that explaination. I am tired of debating about something that has become obvious to me and many others.

Edited by Vertiboy, 12 May 2007 - 03:05 PM.


#217 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 May 2007 - 07:27 PM

You probably won't read this, but I'd just like to say that many of the "plot-holes" you mention are not, in fact, plot-holes. Just as an example, we do not know if these sages were involved in the conflict in the adult timeline, nor do we know that the ToP can break out of chains as easily as you claim. But still, it looks like you want to stop, so I'll stop.

#218 Vertiboy

Vertiboy

    Crusader

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 15 May 2007 - 06:35 PM

Hey, I don't know what anyone has posted since my last post, but I want to bring up a point that I think is pretty interesting.

According to the theory I don't believe, Link arrives after the Triforce split, and he and Zelda decide that Ganondorf should be executed so he doesn't cause more trouble. Aonuma said that the execution scene takes place several years after OoT. When is Ganondorf arrested? I have the response to both possible answers.

If he was arrested shortly after OoT, it would be consistent with the logic that the HRF believed he was a serious threat and arrested him as soon as possible. It brings up the problem, though, that if he is so dangerous, why do the Sages wait several years before executing him? Also, if you subscribe to the (BS) idea that Ganondorf couldn't access all of the ToP's power right away, several years would give him enough time to access enough power to escape from imprisonment.

If he was arrested several years after OoT, it would be consistent with the logic that Ganondorf was dangerous, and the Sages wanted to execute him as soon as possible. It brings up the problem, though, again if you believe he couldn't access all of the ToP's power, he could access its power to avoid arrest in the first place.

If he was arrested around the middle of the time between OoT and the execution scene, it isn't consistent with either idea that the HRF was in a hurry to arrest him or the idea that the Sages were in a hurry to execute him.

No matter how you look at it, if the execution scene takes place several years after OoT, Ganondorf would probably have access to the ToP's power, if you believe in that BS. If you believe that he has access to the ToP's full power after he gets it, then it is still a problem.

If Ganondorf never did anything wrong, however, because of Link arriving before his adventure began, then there would be no urge to arrest a man who hasn't done anything wrong (yet). If the attack takes place several years after OoT, and the execution scene takes place shortly after, it is consistent with the idea that they arrested him as soon as possible and tried to execute him as soon as possible.

You can respond if you want, but I just wanted to give you some food for thought, not try to debate with you about these problems.

#219 BourgeoisJerry

BourgeoisJerry

    Apprentice

  • Members
  • 118 posts

Posted 16 May 2007 - 08:32 PM

Look, I was nice enough to let you have the last word, but now you're pushing it, especially when you haven't even read my explanation about Ganondorf not being all powerful. I spent a paragraph explaining it in my last post, but since you seem to be far more willing to type long posts than read them I'll just give you the last sentence: "Okay, so I guess Zelda's statement isn't proof that he can't completely control the Triforce of Power, but Ganondorf does get more powerful as desperation kicks in in Ocarina of Time, so is it impossible that it's the same way in the execution scene which most likely takes place at a time when he has less experience with the Triforce of Power?"

Sometimes it seems your misreading our arguments on purpose. Anyway, I'm gonna try and be nice and keep this debate down.

#220 Chaltab

Chaltab

    Bright Lord of the Sith

  • Members
  • 1,031 posts

Posted 18 May 2007 - 11:14 PM

Since the game is vague, I just use an either-or scenario. My explanations:

If he did have the Triforce of Power before his arrest, the reason he didn't use it was the one given in the "Disproving the Divine Prank" article--he'd run out of magic and could only use it again in proximity to the Twilight Mirror because of the malice it radiated.

And if he didn't have it up until that point, then it was granted to him by the Adult-Timeline Ganon sealed in the Sacred Realm, in the hopes that his younger self would open the gate to the sacred realm and allow him to escape.

#221 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 19 May 2007 - 08:54 AM

If he did have the Triforce of Power before his arrest, the reason he didn't use it was the one given in the "Disproving the Divine Prank" article--he'd run out of magic and could only use it again in proximity to the Twilight Mirror because of the malice it radiated.


But why would he run out of magic? I had based that explanation on some weird idea about Ganondorf being sealed separately from his magic in the Sacred Realm in OoT. I don't see how it can be relevant to the current split situation.

Edited by jhurvid, 19 May 2007 - 08:55 AM.


#222 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 May 2007 - 11:13 AM

Maybe the Sages bested him by draining it or something.

#223 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 19 May 2007 - 12:03 PM

Maybe the Sages bested him by draining it or something.


So why wasn't this done in OoT?

#224 Arturo

Arturo

    I swear this game is Adults Only!

  • ZL Staff
  • 3,356 posts
  • Location:Un lugar de la Mancha
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 May 2007 - 01:22 PM

And why does it eventually fail in TP?

#225 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 19 May 2007 - 01:54 PM

And why does it eventually fail in TP?


The Master Sword repels evil, so it destroyed Ganondorf's magic when it impaled him.

#226 Arturo

Arturo

    I swear this game is Adults Only!

  • ZL Staff
  • 3,356 posts
  • Location:Un lugar de la Mancha
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 May 2007 - 02:29 PM

Huh? I was talking about the supposed "draining in Ganondorf's power" by the Sages.

#227 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 19 May 2007 - 02:32 PM

Huh? I was talking about the supposed "draining in Ganondorf's power" by the Sages.


Oh, sorry. I thought you were referring to my post. Silly me. *slaps head*

Edited by jhurvid, 19 May 2007 - 02:32 PM.


#228 FDL

FDL

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 1,634 posts
  • Location:Right behind you!
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 May 2007 - 09:27 AM

I do think that the chains and the way they bested him involved magic, they're sages. That's what they do.

#229 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 20 May 2007 - 10:07 AM

I do think that the chains and the way they bested him involved magic, they're sages. That's what they do.


I ask you again, why were they unable to do this in OoT? Why were they forced to seal Ganondorf and his evil magic in the Sacred Realm?

#230 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 May 2007 - 11:32 AM

Maybe because he got too powerful to DO that after seven years, while in the Child Timeline they were able to get him probably right after he seized the Triforce. Or you could say that since they're totally different Sages, they have different capabilities.

#231 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 20 May 2007 - 12:21 PM

Maybe because he got too powerful to DO that after seven years, while in the Child Timeline they were able to get him probably right after he seized the Triforce. Or you could say that since they're totally different Sages, they have different capabilities.


It's unlikely that the TP Sages are more powerful, because they would have been there to seal Ganondorf in OoT if they could. Likewise, if it was a matter of stopping Ganondorf before he built up power, then the TP Sages could have done that as well. And as the appointed guardians of Hyrule, you cannot make me believe that the TP Sages knew nothing about what happened in Hyrule to make a difference.

Edited by jhurvid, 20 May 2007 - 12:22 PM.


#232 Chaltab

Chaltab

    Bright Lord of the Sith

  • Members
  • 1,031 posts

Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:48 PM

It could simply be that Ganondorf used it all up. If the scenario was that Ganondorf was constantly pursued after his will to betray the king was discovered, he could have been hounded to the point where he didn't have any of his magic left and was subdued.

Since TP is extremely vague on the whole ordeal, any explanation is going to be at least, in part, speculation.

#233 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:58 PM

It could simply be that Ganondorf used it all up. If the scenario was that Ganondorf was constantly pursued after his will to betray the king was discovered, he could have been hounded to the point where he didn't have any of his magic left and was subdued.

Since TP is extremely vague on the whole ordeal, any explanation is going to be at least, in part, speculation.


My point is that when Ganondorf took the Triforce of Power in OoT, there was no opening for his defeat until the Sages sealed him away at the end of the game. You are trying to find an opening for TP to take place in before then, but there is no room for such an opening to exist. That is why you are resolving to speculation.

Edited by jhurvid, 21 May 2007 - 03:58 PM.


#234 MikePetersSucks

MikePetersSucks

    Actual Japanese Person

  • ZL Staff
  • 4,174 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:58 PM

The TP Sages, btw, might only exist as a result of Link's changing history. Who knows? That'd explain why they didn't intervene.

#235 Fyxe

Fyxe

    hwhere is fyxckz adn her big boobs/>?

  • Members
  • 7,132 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 21 May 2007 - 07:31 PM

but there is no room for such an opening to exist.

Given that history changed... Prove it. Prove there's no opening in those seven years we know virtually nothing about.

#236 Chaltab

Chaltab

    Bright Lord of the Sith

  • Members
  • 1,031 posts

Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:38 PM

Given that history changed... Prove it. Prove there's no opening in those seven years we know virtually nothing about.


Well, couldn't have said it better myself.

We have no idea the exact order of what happened in those seven years in the ADULT timeline, let alone in a timeline where the only known end result was Ganondorf's bochted excecution.

Edited by Chaltab, 21 May 2007 - 10:38 PM.


#237 Vertiboy

Vertiboy

    Crusader

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 22 May 2007 - 12:09 AM

I have a comment that I am pretty sure is unrelated to the debate at hand (so don't try to get me involved again). The original point of this thread was to prove that OoT is not self-inconsistent. While I think that the Song of Storms is consistent with the split timeline, I have found what I think may be a self-inconsistency, if pure canon is applied (in which I don't believe, anyway). Duke Serkol (sp?) helped me find this.

Link has the Triforce of Courage when he arrives in his childhood; fact.
Link has the Hylian Shield when he arrives in his childhood; fact.
Link is not wearing the Goron Bracelet when he arrives in his childhood; fact.

No matter when Link arrives in his childhood and no matter what kind of time travel logic you apply to OoT's ending, there will be an inconsistency.

If Link arrives after the Triforce split, he should be wearing the bracelet.
If Link arrives before meeting Zelda, and MM laws apply, he should have the bracelet.
If Link arrives before meeting Zelda, and MM laws do not apply, he should not have the ToC.

No matter which option you choose, there will be a plothole. I think that OoT is self-inconsistent in this way.

#238 Duke Serkol

Duke Serkol

    Famicom

  • ZL Staff
  • 1,413 posts

Posted 22 May 2007 - 06:45 AM

Ah that's what I meant in my pm: I don't think that's a plot hole, it's just the authors deliberately deciding that the Triforce does not follow the same rules ordinary items do.

Edited by Duke Serkol, 22 May 2007 - 06:45 AM.


#239 Raien

Raien

    Famicom

  • Members
  • 4,833 posts
  • Location:Luton
  • Gender:Male
  • United Kingdom

Posted 22 May 2007 - 09:23 AM

Given that history changed... Prove it. Prove there's no opening in those seven years we know virtually nothing about.


Asking your opponent to disprove speculation is not a winning argument. An opening for Ganondorf's weakness is speculation, and that is why it cannot be explained with anything but speculation.

#240 Chaltab

Chaltab

    Bright Lord of the Sith

  • Members
  • 1,031 posts

Posted 22 May 2007 - 08:56 PM

Given that history changed... Prove it. Prove there's no opening in those seven years we know virtually nothing about.


Asking your opponent to disprove speculation is not a winning argument. An opening for Ganondorf's weakness is speculation, and that is why it cannot be explained with anything but speculation.


Assuming he never had a point of vulnerability is equally speculation. As Fyxe said, we know virtually nothing about this time period.




Copyright © 2025 Zelda Legends