Fyxe, on Dec 31 2005, 12:16 AM, said:
'Ganon' is the same 'Ganon' he's always been. Hence his desire to be rid of Zelda 'forever', and similar lines of dialogue that suggest prior engagement with Zelda (well, A Zelda) and the hero.
I don't think the 'forever' part suggests he knows Zelda from before. Ganon is just a little over the top sometime ("Curse you! I'll kill all your desendants"). He speaks like a typical villain would.
Quote
Ganondorf in FSA is a reborn version of Ganondorf from OoT/TWW, just like Link is seemingly a reincarnation, born at a time where he has no power over the Gerudos and is thought of by most people as just a criminal desert nomad (if he is even known at all). However, he reverts back to his form as a demon once he gets the trident, becoming Ganon once more.
But Link doesn't have to collect anything to become a hero, whilst you're suggesting Ganondorf needs the Trident to become Ganon. I don't see how it's like reincarnation.
Hero of Legend, on Dec 31 2005, 02:02 PM, said:
Jokes aside, I agree with what you said, though as always there are some minor things...
Correct, but we do not know if Zelda did connect the appearance of Ganon with his name, because Ganon had already revealed it himself: "Zelda! I, Ganon, now seal you away forever!"
It is also possible that FSA explains how Ganon got the Trident before ALttP, though it requires more speculation.
I agree. What I am suggesting in this theory is that FSA was about Ganon getting the Trident before aLttP.
Doopliss, on Dec 31 2005, 07:33 PM, said:
Yes, but Ganondorf is not the same. He's a reincarnation of OoT Ganondorf. Reincarnation is different from reborn.
How is reincarnation different than reborn, and why would FSA Ganondorf be OoT Ganondorf reincarnated? Where is it suggested that this is the case?
Hero of Legend, on Dec 31 2005, 08:06 PM, said:
Huh? I think you meant "revived", not "reborn". In order to be reincarnated you need to be reborn. Thus, in essence, reborn and reincarnated are the same thing (in this case). When you are revived however, you are resurrected to life by an outside force. That is different from being reborn or reincarnated.
Yeah, and it's also very "standard" for the villain to go something like: "Oh no! That can't be happening! ARGHHHH!" when you defeat him. However, I brought this up only because Ganon acts so different in FSA compared to TWW. In that game he was fully aware that he could be defeated by Link, because he knew who Link was. That is not the case with FSA Ganon: "My blood boils, heroes! It seethes at the sight of you! Four Sword or no, my trident will reduce you to nothingness!" Now, obviously, Ganon thinks that he will win because of the Trident. But if Fyxe is right and this game is after ALttP, why the hell would he be more confident in FSA when he had both the Trident and the Triforce in ALttP?
How could the game be after aLttP if the Dark World still exists?
Fyxe, on Jan 2 2006, 12:36 AM, said:
A fair amount, also there does seem to be some connection between the unnamed Pyramid in FSA and the Pyramid of Power in ALttP, which is where we last saw the trident (unless you count the weapon Phantom Ganon weilded in OoT). Also, the trident is not what's turned Ganondorf into a demon and the King of Darkness in previous games; it's always been the Triforce, so this implies that the trident has some of the Triforce's power, which makes sense if it was used (and presumably made) by Ganon in ALttP. This makes less sense if the trident came first, and requires a tad more fanfic.
The problem with it coming after aLttP is that you can see the Dark World in FSA. Hence it has to come after OoT Child and before aLttP.
Fatgoron, on Jan 2 2006, 02:45 PM, said:
I think I can phrase that a little better.
The forever part only makes sense if Ganon is expecting her to cause trouble for him in the future, otherwise being rid of her even momentarily should be enough.
Logically, the only way Ganon could expect to be troubled by her in the future is if he's been around long enough to recognise the correlation between princess Zelda and his plans going tits up.
So, the forever line implies that he has had prior experiences that make him believe that Zelda will be a thorn in his side for so long as she exists.
Not necessarily. To say "I'm going to get rid of you" could be interpreted as meaning "I'm going to stop you from interfering with me". To say "I'm going to get rid of you forever" suggests "I'm going to kill you". It's a dressed up death threat which you see in tons of comics/cartoons ("I'll make sure you don't bother me, ever again" to characters that have just met and pissed each other off). That's the only difference between the two phrases IMO.
Mohammed Ali