
Possibility of the OoT ending
#61
Posted 13 June 2005 - 03:29 PM
#62
Posted 13 June 2005 - 03:36 PM
You can't travel to the future, but you're still connected to your future.
#63
Posted 13 June 2005 - 03:45 PM
#64
Posted 13 June 2005 - 04:22 PM
So then if you're still connected to your future then that would mean that what you do in the past changes the future, and it is overwritten. I was just answering your question:IT'S JUST A DOOR. Just because you can't travel between the past and the future doesn't mean they're not connected.
You can't travel to the future, but you're still connected to your future.
Again, just because THE DOOR IS CLOSED, why does the future have to be overwritten or split into a different timeline?
#65
Posted 13 June 2005 - 04:43 PM
I've talked about this earlier. Time is fixed in OoT, you can't change the future, and you can't change the past.
#66
Posted 13 June 2005 - 04:54 PM
#67
Posted 13 June 2005 - 05:11 PM
Zelda did not send him back to change the future. Never did she do this. Why would Link have to bother defeating Ganon if he could simply go back and stop Ganon from ever attacking?
She sent him back so he could have his seven years back.
With the way time works in OoT, the events leading up to Ganon's attack on Hyrule and his sealing in the Sacred Realm will happen the same way, and Link cannot do anything to stop it.
#68
Posted 13 June 2005 - 09:29 PM
#69
Posted 13 June 2005 - 11:07 PM
But you just said that Link can't change the future. If Link grows up differently, isn't he changing his future?The Link from the past will not grow up to be the same adult Link we play as in the future. He will be slightly different, he will grow up somewhere else (anywhere other than being stuck in the Sacred Realm, that is), he may die, he is, as Zelda put it, simply regaining his lost time.
Zelda did not send him back to change the future. Never did she do this. Why would Link have to bother defeating Ganon if he could simply go back and stop Ganon from ever attacking?
She sent him back so he could have his seven years back.
With the way time works in OoT, the events leading up to Ganon's attack on Hyrule and his sealing in the Sacred Realm will happen the same way, and Link cannot do anything to stop it.
#70
Posted 13 June 2005 - 11:17 PM
#71
Posted 14 June 2005 - 06:06 AM
But you just said that Link can't change the future. If Link grows up differently, isn't he changing his future?
NO BECAUSE IT'S A DIFFERENT LINK.
The other version of himself is still sealed in the Sacred Realm, and will awake in seven years. The other Link can do whatever he wants, and we see he leaves Hyrule (ends up in Termina for a bit), and is no longer in Hyrule by the time the grown up Link awakens from being sealed.
Excluding gameplay elements (chests, Magic Beans and stuff that is optional like that), everything Link has done in the past, the events with the Song of Storms, the events leading up to Nabooru's kidnap have already happened when Link first awakens in the future. This therefore *includes* everything young Link does after being sent back to the past in the ending.
#72
Posted 14 June 2005 - 06:19 AM
http://www.gamehiker...at=7&p=theories
I haven't read in a while so I don't know how accurate it is but it's like Fyxe said, it a different version of Link. The one who had finished his job. The other one is the one who that Link began as and is still traveling back and firth until he completes his mission, thus become the second version of Link.
I'm too tired to go into depth...
#73
Posted 14 June 2005 - 10:44 AM
#74
Posted 14 June 2005 - 01:02 PM
He may simply of been trying to show that since Majora's Mask was set after the young Link ending, then WW is based on the future ending.
Remember that even though there are two Links and two ToCs, one of them is sealed in the Sacred Realm for seven years, then returns to the past, so in the end it evens itself out.
#75
Posted 14 June 2005 - 01:08 PM
Oooooohh! Two Links... Two ToC's... I can see how it can work now. (It's like in Sailor Moon when there were there were two Moon Crystals!) That might even be what Aonoma meant when he said TWW takes place after the future ending!
Note to self: To get toast to agree with you, use Sailor Moon references...
#76
Posted 14 June 2005 - 01:36 PM
#77
Posted 14 June 2005 - 02:05 PM
MPS, that doesn't work. The grown-up Link awakens in the Sacred Realm, and is clearly meant to be the same Link as the one you've just been playing as. No 'possession' going on. Not only that, but when Zelda sends Link back, she obviously doesn't end up with the adult Link still with her.
That's just all fanfic and entirely random, not supported by anything in the game.
Is it THAT hard for people to grasp the concept of the young Link leaving Hyrule and maybe, just maybe, NOT coming back at all?
After all, in WW it talks about the hero leaving the land and not returning.
#78
Posted 14 June 2005 - 02:27 PM
#79
Posted 15 June 2005 - 06:56 PM

#80
Posted 15 June 2005 - 08:44 PM
(TRBEToOoTTT = The Reverse Butterfly Effect Theory of "Ocarina of Time" Time Travel)
#81
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:55 AM
#82
Posted 16 June 2005 - 01:39 PM
#83
Posted 16 June 2005 - 01:53 PM
So it doesn't make sense. It's just a deus ex machina for people to get their timelines to work.
#84
Posted 16 June 2005 - 01:56 PM
BTW, bite me Vazor. That way I can be a were-plumber.
#85
Posted 16 June 2005 - 02:10 PM
#86
Posted 16 June 2005 - 03:17 PM
It's also technically the same as Fyxe's, but insteads of having two Links you have one.
No, it doesn't account for the way items travel - but that's just a gameplay mechanic.
#87
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:16 PM
#88
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:24 PM
#89
Posted 16 June 2005 - 06:59 PM
My theory seems to be the same as MPS's...
It's also technically the same as Fyxe's, but insteads of having two Links you have one.
No, it doesn't account for the way items travel - but that's just a gameplay mechanic.
Except it's a fairly big gameplay mechanic, because Link travels through half of the Spirit Temple, leading to Nabooru's kidnap, due to it.
Also, the idea of one Link totally buggers up the way time travel works anyway. If Link returns to the past at the end of the game, but there's no other Link stuck in the Sacred Realm, then the future events will occur very differently, which, as shown by the in-game time travel logic, is impossible.
#90
Posted 16 June 2005 - 07:08 PM