
LET THE SPECULATION BEGIN! ZELDA AND SHEIKAH AND WEREWOLVES, OH MY!
#61
Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:20 PM
#62
Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:24 PM
All I've got to say is, I really hope this shadow guy is a Sheikah of some sort.
#63
Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:48 PM
Anyway...

As TSA's pointed out already, the pattern doesn't match Ganondorf's in TWW. But I think it's pretty Ganon-esque. Although, I don't recall Ganon's horns (if that is a horn) going in that direction (although in most of the games he doesn't even have horns).
Could be a Sheikah. It has the symbol and it's pretty Shadow Folkish looking.
Looks like Link's carrying quite a heavy blade there. I'm intrigued by the back view (well...side in this case) of Zelda' hair. I think it's how it was in FSA.
#64
Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:24 PM
Oh, and Sheikh will most likely have the ability to turn into a wolf in this game. I'm pretty sure as Miyamoto seems to be giving the hints.
Mohammed Ali
#65
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:28 AM
Goodness sake, people. Maybe that "Sheikah" owns the wolf as some kind of pet. Heck! Maybe it's not a wolf, just some wolf-like dog!
#66
Posted 28 April 2005 - 06:16 AM
But then again...that would be kinda ripping off from Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories.
What if he starts as a good guy then switches sides? lol
#67
Posted 28 April 2005 - 06:37 AM
I'm so lost. What's with this werewolf stuff?
Anyway...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v56/TRIF...RCE89/egm_1.jpg
As TSA's pointed out already, the pattern doesn't match Ganondorf's in TWW. But I think it's pretty Ganon-esque. Although, I don't recall Ganon's horns (if that is a horn) going in that direction (although in most of the games he doesn't even have horns).
Could be a Sheikah. It has the symbol and it's pretty Shadow Folkish looking.
Looks like Link's carrying quite a heavy blade there. I'm intrigued by the back view (well...side in this case) of Zelda' hair. I think it's how it was in FSA.
It doesn't really look like a horn though. It looks more like a ruffle in his/her cloak.
#68
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:03 AM
I can understand how Triforce89 thought it was a horn, becaues it doesn't actually look like a ruffle. It sticks out beyond the cloak slightly, suggesting that it isn't a part of the cloak.
If it weren't for the fact that it goes over the hood slightly, I would have said it was just a black earring, coz it's about the right height to be a big ass black earring. That kinda suggests that the wearer is perhaps a female.
#69
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:32 AM
#70
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:14 AM
Mohammed Ali
#71
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:31 AM

#72
Guest_Jabba_*
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:41 AM
#73
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:41 AM
If we're being random... maybe the cloaked figure is the wizard from the AoL backstory
lol I actually like that idea! How cool would it be for the next Zelda to have an AoL reference or a couple of references?

#74
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:02 PM
Mohammed Ali
#75
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:59 PM

I hope so. IS this a continuation of Oot? Is there ANYTHING that says this is definitely a sequel to WW? *sigh*
But, I'll bite. The cloaked figure, as many have said, could be some Sheikah. That being said, if this is OoT, this could very well be the Sheikah guardian of Link. If WW, the figure most resembles...no one. Entirely new character, *points* right there. But I'm geting bad vibes if this doesn't involve Ganon...that should be a crime for the 3D titles...
#76
Posted 28 April 2005 - 02:04 PM
#77
Posted 28 April 2005 - 02:45 PM
I agree. That is the more pertinant question, but as we can't begin to answer that, looking at this shady sheikh is a good filler for conversation until we can.I actually don't see why people are concerned with that. To me the bigger question is...DO WE GET TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED TO OOT CHILD LINK?!
It seems to be a continuation of OoT given the character designs, but obviously no one knows for sure. As for it being a sequal to WW. There was a quote saying it is chronologically after it, but that has been replaced by 'we haven't decided'. This is similar to what happened with WW which was said to be a prequal to all games until it was later revealed as being a sequal to Adult Links 'ending'.I hope so. IS this a continuation of Oot? Is there ANYTHING that says this is definitely a sequel to WW? *sigh*
It is stated to envolve Ganon already. No pictures of him so far though. Guess we have to wait a while.But, I'll bite. The cloaked figure, as many have said, could be some Sheikah. That being said, if this is OoT, this could very well be the Sheikah guardian of Link. If WW, the figure most resembles...no one. Entirely new character, *points* right there. But I'm geting bad vibes if this doesn't involve Ganon...that should be a crime for the 3D titles...
Mohammed Ali
#78
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:34 PM
#79
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:41 PM

#80
Posted 28 April 2005 - 04:02 PM
#81
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:06 PM
Actually I miss the days when it was OoT-MM | ALttP-LA | LoZ-AoL. There were only two theories back then. Either there was one Link or Three. That was it. Times were simpler back then. Ah, those were the days. Things started getting whonky ever since OoX and the timeline has never been the same thanks to TWW.
And the one Link "theory" was flat out wrong at that. Of course too many people seem to forget (or not be aware of in the first place) that right up until Majora's Mask there was a 100% accurate Zelda game chronology, and throw this six game build out of the window rather than "build" the rest of the games around it when theorising the chronology.
#82
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:11 PM
#83
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:16 PM
#84
Guest_Zangus_*
Posted 28 April 2005 - 06:23 PM
Okay, we have Hyrule being gone forever in TWW, ALttP Link's still drifting on a piece of wood God knows where after LA, and two Zelda's existing at the same time at the end of AoL. There are bigger plot holes to worry about than what happened to OoT Link.
Wow that is one of the very few statements on here that I totally agree with. I'm not alone!

Im still certain this is a new Link, but if they should pick up anywhere it should be the older Zelda games first before the oh so beloved OOT.

#85
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:16 PM
Okay, we have Hyrule being gone forever in TWW, ALttP Link's still drifting on a piece of wood God knows where after LA, and two Zelda's existing at the same time at the end of AoL. There are bigger plot holes to worry about than what happened to OoT Link.
I agree with this too, although LTTP Link's plothole is trivial, and I'd rather know where the Sleeping Zelda story is than what happened to the second Zelda. I figured one ruled North Hyrule and one ruled South Hyrule. Simple. I'D love to see how this solves the Imprisoning War. Oh god -.-
#86
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:41 PM
#87
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:07 PM
MMT? Wuzzat?
Multiple Maruio Theory. You see, the Mario from Donkey Kong was Mario I. He and Pauline get sent to the end of DK94 (I think it was) You see them there... for some reason. They take up residency. Mario marries her and they give birth to Mario II and Luigi II (named after Mario's brother). These are the Mario's that we see today still saving Peach and stuff. The YI games are also the story of Mario II. So in effect there already was a Mario Jr. But I'm not him. I would be Prince Mario III, a yet to be child of Mario and Peach.
#88
Guest_Zangus_*
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:49 PM
#89
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:58 PM
#90
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:08 PM
As for the Sleeping Zelda - she wouldn't have ruled anything, as was never in a position to take over Hyrule. Her brother was the rightful heir to the throne, and one of his children would have taken over after him.
Link left at sea was also very easy to use as a staring point for fan fiction to tie the games together - he washes up on the shores of Calatia, where he starts a family and produces the bloodline that eventually produces the LoZ/AoL Link
