
Roman Catholics for Death?
#61
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:17 PM
#62
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:24 PM
And its been the three mods doing it.

#63
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:29 PM
#64
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:30 PM
So...uh, yeah. Catholics should't support the death penalty.
#65
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:32 PM
#66
Posted 19 September 2004 - 12:33 PM
When peoples posts got shorter and shorter and they trailed off...
#67
Posted 19 September 2004 - 05:38 PM

#68
Guest_Windmill_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:00 PM
#69
Guest_SouthpawLink_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:10 PM
I think there is a bit of leeway on the death penalty issue, although on the abortion issue, the Church is most certainly clear, and her teaching on abortion dates back to the first century (see the Didache, 2, 2: SCh 248,148, which says, "You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.").
The Church on the Death Penalty:
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph no. 2267Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.
If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.
Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself - the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity "are very rare, if not practically nonexistent."
#70
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:35 PM
Originally posted by Bulmaro@Sep 19 2004, 06:38 PM
Isn't that too much spam for being mods...?
Bulmaro, you are so banned. I smite you with my power.

#71
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:40 PM
#72
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:42 PM
Originally posted by Alakhriveion@Sep 19 2004, 07:40 PM
Psssh, Granite, you have no power.
Don't I?!?
Muahahahaha....
*closes threads everywhere*
#73
Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:44 PM
Bulmaro, you are so banned. I smite you with my power.
These are contro mods. They're special.
#74
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:29 PM
#75
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:31 PM
I just have to reach over and tap an admin (with my fingertips, where the ability lies), and then they'll do it.
#76
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:37 PM
#77
Guest_Vorpal_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:19 PM
His reasoning was that the Pope and Vatican were just wrong.
Catholics (though they don't like to say it) change their views on things over time. Depends on the Pope, and it depends on popular opinion of the church. So a lot of Catholics choose to have their own beliefs about their own spirituality, and they don't let it be totally controlled by the Vatican.
#78
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:23 PM
#79
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:24 PM
And I don't like this thread. It seems to be an excuse to rip on Catholics. Non-Catholics just believe what they read/hear and [img]http://forums.legendsalliance.com/public/ALOT.png[/img] of it isnt true.

#80
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:26 PM
#81
Guest_Vorpal_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:27 PM
There's your answer to why they're inconsistent with the Catholic Church at large.
#82
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:29 PM
#83
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:29 PM
And I refuse to be a mindless zombie who believes in everything the church says. Sorry but i'm more independant than that. >_<;
Not to mention the many types of prodestants and the fact that Catholics are the largest denomination...
#84
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:31 PM
Actually, Catholics believe that Peter was the first Pope. John was just an apostle. In any case, you can't pwn me, because i don't believe in a pope. Ha!Originally posted by Coltxdoom@Sep 19 2004, 08:29 PM
Yeah well, actually Catholics were first..because John was a pope even though it wasn't called a pope and the prodestants branched off from the Catholics...so we pwn you, Arunma! XD

#85
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:34 PM
Originally posted by arunma@Sep 19 2004, 07:31 PM
Actually, Catholics believe that Peter was the first Pope. John was just an apostle. In any case, you can't pwn me, because i don't believe in a pope. Ha!
Yes Yes..peter..well what else would Peter be if he baptised people, and that Catholism was the first religon..in the new testament?
#86
Guest_Vorpal_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:36 PM
Originally posted by Coltxdoom@Sep 19 2004, 09:29 PM
Yeah well, actually Catholics were first..because John was a pope even though it wasn't called a pope and the prodestants branched off from the Catholics...so we pwn you, Arunma! XD
And I refuse to be a mindless zombie who believes in everything the church says. Sorry but i'm more independant than that. >_<;
Not to mention the many types of prodestants and the fact that Catholics are the largest denomination...
I said Catholics weren't mindless zombies... not all of them at least.
But I wouldn't encourage you to start a topic about the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism, unless you're willing to face the storm you'd unleash...
And... it's Peter... Peter is claimed by Catholics to have been the first Pope...
#87
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:37 PM
#88
Guest_Vorpal_*
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:38 PM
#89
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:42 PM
#90
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:49 PM