
Light Force
#1
Posted 01 January 2005 - 12:44 PM
What is the light force? What does it do? Who made it? Is it the Triforce? Is it a "force" that makes up the Triforce? Is it the fourth "force" on the Hylian shield? What are your opinions? Why?
#2
Posted 01 January 2005 - 01:13 PM
It is not the Triforce, that is just silly. How can something with infinite divine holy power from the Goddesses need to be enhanced by a disney merlin hat O_o? As for the sheild? Sure, why the hell not?
#3
Posted 01 January 2005 - 01:26 PM
So what you're (MikePetersSucks) saying is, there is a fourth power (Light Force), which is a golden triangle like a Triforce piece and of similar power out there. That's practically a tetraforce theory, soon people will call it "The Triforce of Light".
Could it not simply be the Triforce of Wisdom?
#4
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:29 PM
When Zelda uses the Light Force in tMC, no crest or Triforce symbol is shown, but in every other Zelda game, a crest or the physical Triforce is shown prominently whenever it is in use.
It seems to be passed down through the bloodline of the Royal Family, only showing itself in the Princesses of the line. That's not strong evidence either way, but there has never been any instance of the Triforce being some ethereal blood-line thing.
Vaati drains part of it to power himself - I find it hard to believe that he could partially drain the power of the Triforce, united or not.
If it IS the Triforce, then it's only one piece of it. But if that's the case, then why isn't there even a hint of other pieces lying around somewhere?
#5
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:30 PM
#6
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:30 PM
#7
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:33 PM
#8
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:39 PM
Vaati drains part of it to power himself - I find it hard to believe that he could partially drain the power of the Triforce, united or not.
If it IS the Triforce, then it's only one piece of it. But if that's the case, then why isn't there even a hint of other pieces lying around somewhere?
Part of it? TWW and LOZ both sure a force can be broken into various pieces.
Because Vaati knows only of one, perhaps?
Hopefully, TMC's prequel will clear this up.
#9
Posted 01 January 2005 - 02:52 PM
#10
Posted 01 January 2005 - 03:02 PM
EDIT: I also just realised, seeing as the Four Sword Shrine in ALTTP is the Sacred Realm's equivalent to Hyrule castle - that means the Minish Realm is the Sacred Realm and they brought the Light Force over (TMC-BS). Ganon's corruption of the Sacred Realm could've killed them off.
#11
Posted 02 January 2005 - 01:29 AM
As we have discussed TMC's place in the timeline, it has become reasonably apparent that it is somewhere near the beginning. If this is so, and it is indeed before OoT, then we could conclude that the fourth little triangle below the united triforce on the Hylian shield could be the Light Force emblem. It would tie in with the previous history, and it is also kept separate because it is not a triforce; it's a completely different object of power.
#12
Guest_Zangus_*
Posted 02 January 2005 - 01:58 AM
I just think simply the Light Force is a special power given to the firstborn Princess in the Royal Family, specifically magic powers such as telepathy and maybe the power to transforms ones outside shape(like with Sheik). Probably a like instinctive self defence, however I think Zelda would still need to be taught these abilitys, perhaps by her Nanny or Mother(Impa or previous Zelda); as in the WW Tetra appears to have no magical ability, but somehow must have magical power other she wouldn't be able to shoot light arrows.
I agree with Khallos, I see it as nothing more than a power granted upon the Zeldas of Hyrule. It makes sense logically and does'nt take away from the Triforce by adding some fourth piece nonsense.
#13
Posted 02 January 2005 - 06:53 AM
Is it not at all plausible that the power is the ToW?
#14
Posted 02 January 2005 - 07:36 AM
This could be another Triumph Forks idea. The people have no name for it so call it Light Force.
#15
Posted 02 January 2005 - 07:41 AM
#16
Posted 02 January 2005 - 10:40 AM
Quick translation: "From the heavens, the small Pikkoru appear to the people’s Hero, with a Light of Gold and one mere sword."
黄金の光 "Ougon no hikari" - Plain and simple: Light of Gold.
I tried searching "Ougon no hikari" in the Japanese text dump of Ocarina of Time and I also tried searching the KWhazit's translation of A Link to the Past and there was not a single match for this "Light of Gold." I think that if they intended to make it the Triforce they would at least use something a bit more familiar, such as 黄金の力 "Ougon no Chikara," ("Golden Power"), which is what it was called in Link to the Past. Or 黄金の聖三角 "Ougon no Seisankaku" which just means something like "Golden Holy Triangle."
#17
Posted 02 January 2005 - 11:03 AM
#18
Posted 02 January 2005 - 11:14 AM
#19
Posted 02 January 2005 - 11:26 AM
#20
Posted 02 January 2005 - 11:33 AM
Someone mentioned something about the Japanese version, so I decided to post about it and give my opinion.
#21
Posted 02 January 2005 - 01:24 PM
#22
Posted 02 January 2005 - 02:08 PM
Personally, I'd rather enjoy being asked by a fan, "What on Earth is the Light Force?" and then giving him a knowing smile and say nothing about it, or something insanely cryptic that has no real meaning. Of course, this is all based on the assumption that game developers have a sadistic sense of humour, like I have (at times).
Capcom is famous for inconsistencies and getting their plot-related game items doing inconsistently strange things. Seeing as the game was made in part by Capcom, I wouldn't be surprised to see if their abilities have crossed over to the Zelda franchise.
An example of Capcom screwing up attempts to fix timeline inconsistencies:
In the game series, Resident Evil, a game character known as Wesker dies a horrible, horrible death in the first game (involving missing vital organs). He reappears in the fourth game and no explanation is given as to how he survived having a full lung-ectomy without anaesthetic or sterile surgical instruments.
Capcom then decided to quickly come up with an explanation by releasing, the Wesker Files, which explains how Wesker infected himself with a special strain of virus that kept him alive and mutated him into some kind of superhuman.
That would have worked well, were it not for the following facts:
1. The strain of virus Wesker used was a virus that didn't appear until the second game, and was not available to him at the time of him dying.
2. In the fourth game, he is required to steal a new virus for his new employers who want it to create a supersoldier. The only problem being is that the new virus has not been tested yet. However, the one Wesker used on himself, has clearly turned him into some kind of evil Superman with no apparent side-effects (except for the fact that he's got cat-like eyes), which begs the question as to why his new employers just didn't use him as the basis for their new super soldier.
That isn't the only attempt they've made to solve inconsistencies that have only resulted in throwing up even more inconsistencies. Now a certain developing team from Capcom have got their hands on the Zelda franchise.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
#23
Posted 02 January 2005 - 02:38 PM
#24
Posted 02 January 2005 - 02:50 PM
#25
Posted 02 January 2005 - 05:07 PM
#26
Posted 02 January 2005 - 08:51 PM
OK then. It just seems pointless to me, to believe it's something new with no place in the ZU whereas you could easily take it to be a Triforce piece (in this case, the ToW) which we know a lot about.
Adding more elements when it is unnecessary is, of course to be avoided.
However, so is jumping to conclusions, especially ones that you feel are extremely incorrent or inconsistent.
And Wolf has a point. Yet another item, to add to my list of reasons for Capcom to leave Zelda the hell alone.
#27
Posted 02 January 2005 - 09:02 PM
#28
Posted 03 January 2005 - 06:33 AM
#29
Posted 03 January 2005 - 10:09 AM
#30
Posted 03 January 2005 - 10:19 AM