
Skyward Sword's ending (in spoiler tags)
#31
Posted 15 November 2011 - 05:25 AM
#32
Posted 16 November 2011 - 07:58 AM
*Sigh* I think I'm going to need a stiff drink come Friday.
EDIT: For clarification:
Edited by Raien, 16 November 2011 - 06:14 PM.
#33
Posted 16 November 2011 - 12:24 PM
I just saw the final battle footage and yeah, the 4chan rumours I assumed were true were in fact fake. That said, the real ending is not much better.
Spoiler
*Sigh* I think I'm going to need a stiff drink come Friday.
Still I would have done it differently.
Edited by SOAP, 16 November 2011 - 12:34 PM.
#34
Posted 16 November 2011 - 12:38 PM
#35
Posted 16 November 2011 - 03:10 PM
#36
Posted 17 November 2011 - 11:30 AM
#37
Posted 17 November 2011 - 12:56 PM
Edited by Sir Turtlelot, 17 November 2011 - 12:56 PM.
#38
Posted 17 November 2011 - 11:18 PM
#39
Posted 18 November 2011 - 04:23 AM
Possibly, but ZZ was just trying to set the games up in a way that would make Raien at least a little happier with the story progression of OoT's Ganondorf's motive.
Trust me, that's a lost cause.
#40
Posted 26 November 2011 - 12:49 AM
All the previous knowledge of the Triforce...
#41
Posted 29 November 2011 - 10:12 PM
#42
Posted 02 December 2011 - 02:19 PM
#43
Posted 02 December 2011 - 03:08 PM
whatever the case, being the embodiment of someone else's hatred does a great job explaining how he got so easily corrupted.
#44
Posted 02 December 2011 - 03:30 PM
#45
Posted 02 December 2011 - 09:55 PM
Interestingly, as the timeline seems to go (in my interpretation anyway), Link and Zelda drift apart over the millenia, becoming less and less affectionate and more and more formal due to not knowing each other well what with their dtrifting-apart social stations and the whole Save The World thing.
Maybe that's the true curse, here. They're together forever, but it's becoming less meaningful for them to be so. Someone want to comb through all the games and see how a timeline would look like on a scale based on this idea? Like, for example, TMC has them more affectionate than OOT, so TMC comes first, etc?
#46
Posted 02 December 2011 - 10:53 PM
#47
Posted 02 December 2011 - 11:53 PM
#48
Posted 04 December 2011 - 07:17 AM
I didn't like the way that Nintendo tried to give him more depth. It felt forced, and it came without foreshadowing. So I'm open to another plot device that explain's Ganondorf's origins.
Edited by Hooded Warrior, 04 December 2011 - 07:20 AM.
#49
Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:05 PM
Maybe that's the true curse, here. They're together forever, but it's becoming less meaningful for them to be so. Someone want to comb through all the games and see how a timeline would look like on a scale based on this idea? Like, for example, TMC has them more affectionate than OOT, so TMC comes first, etc?
You'd have Spirit Tracks coming before Wind Waker/Phantom Hourglass, which seems slightly problematic.
#50
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:24 PM
I think the game itself has interesting implications on the future of the storyline. The existence of a more futuristic world in the past free of the Master Sword and Ganondorf tropes, while allowing creative freedom to the world could be explored in prequels. Alternatively, a sequel could focus on Ganondorf trying to break free of the will of Demise with a little help from his "friends". Redemption story for a Nintendo villain?
The guys taking over the Zelda creative reings are certainly more story-oriented so anything's possible.
#51
Posted 05 December 2011 - 04:24 PM
You'd have Spirit Tracks coming before Wind Waker/Phantom Hourglass, which seems slightly problematic.
Derp. Well, I don't know, Link and Tetra seemed to have a hell of a thing going on by Phantom Hourglass.
But then Spirit Tracks comes after a seemingly permanent death of Ganondorf anyway. The curse might be full-on broken by King Daphne's wish.
I think the game itself has interesting implications on the future of the storyline. The existence of a more futuristic world in the past free of the Master Sword and Ganondorf tropes, while allowing creative freedom to the world could be explored in prequels. Alternatively, a sequel could focus on Ganondorf trying to break free of the will of Demise with a little help from his "friends". Redemption story for a Nintendo villain?
I wouldn't be interested in any of these possibilities, honestly. They're way too fanfiction-y.
#52
Posted 05 December 2011 - 05:39 PM
#53
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:12 PM
Edited by Person, 05 December 2011 - 06:13 PM.
#54
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:26 PM
#55
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:54 AM
I wouldn't be interested in any of these possibilities, honestly. They're way too fanfiction-y.
So is an implied Link-Zelda romance and they did that (quite well at that). It would seem to be strange to introduce a new Big Bad into the Zelda mythos, not kill him off in the end and use him to explain the source of evil in the world and then not use him again. He surely will show up again and so will Ganondorf because he's Ganondorf. The prequel addiction that the Zelda team is hooked on certainly hasn't been closed off by the Skyward Sword storyline either.
#56
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:45 PM
So is an implied Link-Zelda romance and they did that (quite well at that).
Zelda/Link romance has been around since the first two games, especially with the cartoon.
. It would seem to be strange to introduce a new Big Bad into the Zelda mythos, not kill him off
Errr...well, they kind of did. His body is destroyed and his soul is slowly rotting to nothing, sealed in place by Fi's slumber. That's pretty damn dead as you can expect an immortal quasi-deity Maou to get.
The prequel addiction that the Zelda team is hooked on certainly hasn't been closed off by the Skyward Sword storyline either.
I'd wager that it is; atleast it should be for a good decade, given the significance of Skyward Sword's release.
I mean, there's not much further back they could GO.
#57
Posted 06 December 2011 - 02:07 PM
So is an implied Link-Zelda romance and they did that (quite well at that).
Zelda/Link romance has been around since the first two games, especially with the cartoon.. It would seem to be strange to introduce a new Big Bad into the Zelda mythos, not kill him off
Errr...well, they kind of did. His body is destroyed and his soul is slowly rotting to nothing, sealed in place by Fi's slumber. That's pretty damn dead as you can expect an immortal quasi-deity Maou to get.The prequel addiction that the Zelda team is hooked on certainly hasn't been closed off by the Skyward Sword storyline either.
I'd wager that it is; atleast it should be for a good decade, given the significance of Skyward Sword's release.
I mean, there's not much further back they could GO.
There was no romance implied except on the part of the fans. When on earth did the cartoon impact the games? Now that's fan-fiction!
As for implications based on Zelda traditions if we were to go there, redemption has been a prominent zelda theme since the new guard started taking over circa MM. Skullkid, Staven/Byrne, WW King of Hyrule, Midna are all examples of this, even Ganondorf starts showing depth to his actions in WW. Zelda has been away moving from black and white/good and evil for a while now. And Demise is "sealed", a surefire indication he is indeed alive.
They certainly can go back further if Lanayru desert is populated by robots and moblins carry tazer swords in the past that they don't carry in the present.
#58
Posted 06 December 2011 - 10:09 PM
As for the prequel addiction, hey, with the robots and tech we saw, maybe they can do that sci-fi Zelda some people were wanting, just in the far past instead of the far future. Hell, maybe setting that up was the whole point of including it, you think? Eh? Ehhh? Yeah, me neither.
#59
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:51 PM
There was no romance implied except on the part of the fans. When on earth did the cartoon impact the games? Now that's fan-fiction!
Zelda kisses Link in the second game.
As for implications based on Zelda traditions if we were to go there, redemption has been a prominent zelda theme since the new guard started taking over circa MM. Skullkid, Staven/Byrne, WW King of Hyrule, Midna are all examples of this, even Ganondorf starts showing depth to his actions in WW. Zelda has been away moving from black and white/good and evil for a while now. And Demise is "sealed", a surefire indication he is indeed alive.
All those examples of redemption are people who weren't evil to begin with, and depth of action doesn't equate to sympathy or redemption.
Even dead villains are sealed in Zelda, as indicated by the many sealed ghosts or ruined dark treasures of the Twili. Either way, Demise is "ROTTING AND DISSOLVING", so he'll never be as strong as he was. He's effectively out of the picture.
They certainly can go back further if Lanayru desert is populated by robots and moblins carry tazer swords in the past that they don't carry in the present.
Yea, and there's also no Hylians living on the surface, and the sky barrier had never been penetrated before the events of Skyward Sword. The marvelous adventures of Tazer Moblin, I guess.
So I guess I'm the only one that didn't see Demise place a curse. It read more to me like he was stating the old "good and evil will always exist" deal. Fi's analysis says he's the "source of all monsters," so maybe the guy we saw really was the source of evil in the Zeldaverse given form. That would mean that him saying his hate never perishes, and that he would rise again is simply him saying that evil will never be totally eradicated.
Eh, yes and no. He literally said they'd be dogged by an incarnation of his hatred; that was pretty specific wording and I would give it significance. I like to think that Hylia's plans only called for one Link and Zelda, but Demise bound them with eternal dharmas so that they, and Hyrule, would suffer forever.
#60
Posted 07 December 2011 - 06:35 AM
Could be. It still read more to me like he was stating an established fact, as if something like this had happened before, rather than enacting something, though.Eh, yes and no. He literally said they'd be dogged by an incarnation of his hatred; that was pretty specific wording and I would give it significance. I like to think that Hylia's plans only called for one Link and Zelda, but Demise bound them with eternal dharmas so that they, and Hyrule, would suffer forever.