...he wasn't worthy to Conquer Power seven years after obtaining the Triforce and he was never worthy of it back then.
Actually NM87...it seems as though Zelda's quote only talks about Ganondorf being able to control his power (as in "handle it" [possibly efficiently? Able to mentally handle it?]). It has very little to do with worth and what the goddesses deem as who has high value and who has not. That quote does further establish that the goddesses favor good over evil since you not only need a strong mind, you also need a righteous mind. You may argue that being worthy means that you need a strong, righteous mind, but that is hardly the case because Ganondorf was able to use his piece for seven years and turn Hyrule into an almost dilapidated country. When Link comes and initially defeats him, it is as if he can't handle the other power of the gods--that of courage (even he says that he underestimated its power...) So while at first the objection seems good, it sort of falls apart when you look at it in this respect. Ganondorf was not worthy to get the entire triforce, yes, but to say he is still not worthy is sort of odd. In order to "prove his worth" (so-to-speak), he has to seek out the other two pieces (similar to how Link in WW proves his worth to the gods by finding and reassembling the triforce of courage). If he wasn't worthy to even have a broken piece (or anyone for that matter...), then why did it serve him well in OoT (not in the fullest that Ganondorf wanted though) when Link was absent?
Neither was Zelda.
Ah! The quote you cited doesn't seem to imply anything about worth at all! Zelda says she was to young to see the full scale effects of what the Master Sword was and the whole ordeal of the Sacred Realm. It is quite possible that she did not know the legends of the Sheikah about the triforce that she tells Link towards the end of the game and thus she is sorry for her ignorance when she was younger. She did not expect for the Master Sword to force Link into sleep in order to be the fulfilled Hero of Time; she thought that Link would simply go in the Sacred Realm and get the triforce before Ganondorf. I truly do not know how this quote is related to whether Zelda is worthy of having her own piece or not (despite being chosen by destiny?!) so if you could elaborate on both Ganondorf's quote and hers...
Also, I'm pretty darn sure that Ganondorf, Zelda, and even Link have their respective pieces because Ganondorf curses our protagonists when he is being sealed and says he will destroy their descendants as long as he has the
triforce of power. We also see Ganondorf still having his piece and it is explicitly shown to us at the end of the game along with Link and Zelda. We know that the hero of time had his piece because when he left the adult timeline, his piece broke. Zelda had her piece because we know it to be passed down the Royal Family line (Tetra and the KoRL have the two chunks).
No, ALTTP tells us of the power within the Triforce and OOT tells us how it can be distributed separately.
Actually, both games tell us about the power of the triforce. LttP says in a sort of ambiguous way that the triforce would continue to shine prettily in the Sacred Realm until someone worthy appears, and if we were back in 1994, we could very well NOT believe that ONLY a worthy person could touch it (the triforce is only waiting to be used by someone worthy). When OoT came out, it dispelled the ambiguity by saying that YES, someone does have to be worthy (i.e. balanced heart) to have the full triforce. If such a person is not worthy, they only get one piece (the force that they most believe in) and have to prove their worth (not explicitly stated but it seems apparent) by getting the other two pieces. The only thing I disagree with Jumbie is that of the original intent of LttP: I personally do not think that the developers had the idea of "you need to be worthy or else..." when it first debuted; we have no known knowledge of what happens if a person isn't worthy and that consequence of the "or else..." was created when OoT was in development a couple of years later.
Ganondorf has power in OOT yet doesn?t appear to be worthy of the power bestowed by the Triforce to earn him the inherited power of the one who would ?Conquer Power?.
I know this post may already be a long read so I'll put my points in a list format:
1) Ganondorf doesn't appear to be worthy of the triforce and therefore doesn't get the entire thing. He is not worthy, yes, and that's why he gets only one piece.
2) Wind Waker can attest to this since it features the same Ganondorf who still has his triforce piece (which he exclaimed that he had with his final words in OoT actually) and also Zelda who we know by deduction that she had her piece passed down her line.
3) The title "Conquerer of Power" is ascribed to the actual triforce crest itself, not the person who gets it. The translation guide to LttP says this in the comments section:
These parts of the Triforce don't seem to be titles that are bestowed, like the American version says. these are names for what literally make up the Triforce.
4) Your quotes that you cited from OoT do not seem to be related at all to being worthy of a triforce piece or not. In fact, Sheik's little speech about the triforce splitting was to help explain why Ganondorf had the power to have Hyrule at his feet and why he wanted to find the "other pieces".
5) We do not have any requisites from any games that establish what needs to be done in order for a person to get THEIR piece and only talk about what they need to do to obtain the true force to govern all (that is if they originally touched it; so WW Link's case doesn't really count) so it would be odd for Nintendo to even imply something like that.
6) Do we have any evidence that speaks of just "power" alone and not the actual pieces outside of TP despite LttP showing us the triforce entirely, OoT explicitly referencing the power and "pieces" after the triforce is split up, and WW showing us that OoT characters did have the pieces and we actually saw the pieces on-screen.
Oh, and Lex, I know you were talking about Link wishing in LttP which is why I brought up a small discussion about how the triforce could grant multiple things based on one broad wish (or how the KoRL in WW was able to have more than one wish granted; washing away Hyrule and giving hope to Link and Tetra).
Also, the AoL manual was actually specific in context. Yes, not EVERY time "triforce" means the entire three, but if you read a few portions before the quote you actually cite, it establishes that it was talking about the triforce of courage (so the script writer wouldn't always have to say "triforce of courage" all the time). Not really a good example though. Generally speaking, if a person just says "triforce" without any preceding hint of a specific piece(whether an establishment of a specific piece or in the context of the full relic splitting), then we are to assume it is the entire triforce. Since the title of that piece was called
triforce of courage, it is perfectly reasonable to shorten it to "triforce". So yes, they talk about the entire triforce unless they specify a specific piece beforehand. LttP makes it clear that it is the entire triforce because we see know precedence of talk about a specific piece or splitting. The same thing could go for LoZ, although we could fall back on the explanation that space was limited (it's not even a complete sentence; the precedence given in the manual is the triforce of wisdom).