We can. It's just not certain that we DO.Just like all the arguements that say they're the same. "like, oh my god, they both transport people." We have multiple unrelated magical swords, magical canes, magical medallions, magical ocarinas, etcetera. Why can't we have unrelated magical mirrors?

Agahnim
#91
Posted 02 July 2007 - 04:33 PM
#92
Posted 02 July 2007 - 04:44 PM
Edited by Arturo, 03 July 2007 - 05:46 AM.
#93
Posted 03 July 2007 - 01:09 AM

#94
Posted 03 July 2007 - 01:13 AM
#95
Posted 03 July 2007 - 04:28 AM
#96
Posted 03 July 2007 - 05:22 AM
What is your deal? I'm not saying they're the same, I'm saying they MIGHT be the same. And they might. That's it. Why is it that people on these forums are more prone to superiority complexes than in other Zelda forums? You'd swear I'd just insulted your family or something.Because the mirror is obviously not teared to pieces after Hyrule's destruction in TWW
#97
Posted 03 July 2007 - 05:41 AM
Sarcasm=/=Arrogance
Sarcasm is just a way of expressing yourself. Instead of saying:
You say:The mirror in TP can't be the same as in ALttP because it would be torn to pieces during Hyrule's destruction in TWW
Because the mirror is obviously not torn to pieces after Hyrule's destruction in TWW
If you don't like sarcasm, you'll have to deal with it, because you will find it all over your life. Honestly, I find a little bit childish feeling offended about such an harmless comment. But that's just my opinion. It's not law.
And I believe I am right. If I didn't believe it, the discussion would be pointless. It would be like:
They might be the same
Ok, you are right, they might be the same
etc.I think they might be the same
Edited by Arturo, 03 July 2007 - 05:43 AM.
#98
Posted 04 July 2007 - 09:48 PM
I beg your pardon. I think ALttP happenes in another timeline, yet this only provides a possibility for them to be the same, it seems pretty riddiculous to say they're the same mirror.Not to those who still think that TP goes into a different timeline than Alttp.
someone explain HOW TP leads right into ALttP. Maybe I just missed something.
But then it isn't the Golden Land by definition.
Art doesn't mean anything. Hell, clothing colors don't even match up. "Where the sky shines gold, not blue."
And that's not even taking into account that the Golden Land thing is exclusively North American, so it doesn't matter either way.

Nobody's saying that explicitly. And if anyone looks in their backyard for the Master Sword, then that person in a Moron, because the Master sword is in the Temple of Time. Or in the Lost Woods. Or both.Duh.What, is there someone here saying otherwise? If someone's running into their backyard looking for the Master Sword, I think we have bigger issues than what color the sky in the Golden Realm is or what the hell Agahnim's supposed to be. Someone call the Psych Ward.

So in short: (including your nit-pickyness) there's no substantial argument against me saying the Sacred Realm makes an appearance in TP.
Except for that there are no hints for them being the same. But oh well, since they are mirrors, they aree the same. No matter how different in function.
exactly and also 'Except for that there are no hints for them being the same. But oh well, since they are
It's nice to know I can count on people to word my arguments right

Oh, and I just realied that there's something I need to add to my signature.
#99
Posted 05 July 2007 - 01:05 AM
Hey, don't look at me, you're the one who wanted to put his bits in after I offered to drop it.so WHY the Ganon are you still arguing!?!?!?
someone explain HOW TP leads right into ALttP. Maybe I just missed something.
I wouldn't know, since I don't argue it, but I would think such arguments like how TP neatly provides a transition from a Temple to a Forest for the Master Sword's resting place.
Win.exactly and also 'Except for that there are no hints for them being the same. But oh well, since they are worlds that aren't the Light World, they are the same. No matter how different in function.'
there's no substantial argument against me saying the Sacred Realm makes an appearance in TP.
Neither is there a substantial argument FOR. Occam's Razor kicks in. I win.
#100
Posted 07 July 2007 - 03:36 AM
Pick a number between 1 and 1,000,000...Neither is there a substantial argument FOR. Occam's Razor kicks in. I win.
#101
Posted 07 July 2007 - 02:30 PM
no, an inate sense of skepticism kicks in.Neither is there a substantial argument FOR. Occam's Razor kicks in. I win.
My point is that there's no real argument either way, and I can say it is and you can't argue.
then again you can say it isn't and then I can argue.
Win.
By the way, I was referring to Dark World/Twilight Realm.
I wouldn't know, since I don't argue it, but I would think such arguments like how TP neatly provides a transition from a Temple to a Forest for the Master Sword's resting place.
At which arguments I would bring up how Ganondorf dies at the end.
#102
Posted 08 July 2007 - 01:40 AM
#103
Posted 08 July 2007 - 06:57 AM
#104
Posted 08 July 2007 - 11:49 AM
#105
Posted 08 July 2007 - 12:49 PM
#106
Posted 08 July 2007 - 12:58 PM
#107
Posted 08 July 2007 - 01:04 PM
#108
Posted 08 July 2007 - 03:55 PM
#109
Posted 11 July 2007 - 06:04 PM
TP: "hey coo,l it comes after the child ending of OoT."
TWW: "Hey cool, it comes after the adult ending of OoT."
OoT: "Hey cool, it's the imprisoning war."
So in other words, it's respective of the games. OoT doesn't necessarily relate to ALttP, but it is the imprisoning war.
er, I think I worded that badly.
#110
Posted 11 July 2007 - 07:03 PM
OoT doesn't necessarily relate to ALttP, but it is the imprisoning war.
Impossible. No game involving Ganon can come inbetween the Imprisoning War and LTTP.
#111
Posted 11 July 2007 - 07:08 PM
OoT was intended as the Imprisoning War. Thus it's the Imprisoning War. He's talking about playing each game in it's own context, historically and in regards to developer intention at the time of release.
Whether it is still the IW in the grand scheme of things is irrelevant to that, especially since we don't know.
Three timelines. It's gonna happen.
Edited by Fyxe, 11 July 2007 - 07:09 PM.
#112
Posted 11 July 2007 - 07:49 PM
Exactly. It's just easier that way. That's also how I argueOoT was intended as the Imprisoning War. Thus it's the Imprisoning War. He's talking about playing each game in it's own context, historically and in regards to developer intention at the time of release.
Sadly, yes. If they can pull it off in a way that doesn't suck, I probably won't mind so much.Three timelines. It's gonna happen.
#113
Posted 11 July 2007 - 08:15 PM
1) Why the Sacred Realm is sealed
2) Why Agahnim is going after the maidens
3) Who the hell Ganon is
Edited by LionHarted, 11 July 2007 - 08:15 PM.
#114
Posted 11 July 2007 - 08:43 PM
Who said the Imprisoning War related to ALttP at all
Um, the fact that it's only mentioned in reference to LTTP? DUH?
#115
Posted 11 July 2007 - 08:48 PM
Actually, it's mentioned in OoT (which was designed to tell the story) and TWW (which tells the story of OoT). Never called by that name, of course, but it is never called that by name in ALttP either (just its manual).Um, the fact that it's only mentioned in reference to LTTP?
Of course, this is to be expected, since the sealing of Ganon in OoT only has immediate relevance to TWW, and the sealing of the Sacred Realm only has immediate relevance to ALttP. Why would it be mentioned in any other game? No other irrelevant events are mentioned in a particular game's storyline.
In fact, outside of OoT and ALttP, none of the games that are in the timeline of the Ganon-sealing (Adult) even mention the Sacred Realm at all. Its obscurity may be due to the fact that it's sealed. And its relevance to TP may also be due to the fact that it's... not?
Edited by LionHarted, 11 July 2007 - 08:49 PM.
#116
Posted 12 July 2007 - 12:58 AM
Actually, it's mentioned in OoT (which was designed to tell the story) and TWW (which tells the story of OoT). Never called by that name, of course, but it is never called that by name in ALttP either (just its manual).
That's only if you hold OOT is the Imprisoning War. And I WAS speaking distinctly about it being referred by name. Allusions to it's events don't count.
#117
Posted 12 July 2007 - 01:27 AM
In that case.And I WAS speaking distinctly about it being referred by name.
No game refers to it.
Edited by LionHarted, 12 July 2007 - 01:27 AM.
#118
Posted 12 July 2007 - 01:40 AM
#119
Posted 12 July 2007 - 01:52 AM
ALttP mentions the SEAL in reference to ALttP.LTTP does, but then I consider the manual a sort of "part" of the game.
It mentions the Imprisoning War as being the name of the conflict in which the seal was cast.
Naturally, no other games mention it; no other games have anything to do with the seal. That does not change the fact that hundreds of years still passed in between the war and ALttP in which a number of things could have easily happened that don't have anything to do with ALttP, especially if they decided to represent the IW in OoT (and the story writers admit to this; there is no denying it), and then decided to rewrite OoT as the center of the series, not ALttP.
#120
Posted 06 August 2007 - 10:56 AM