We don't need any more bloody acronyms.
YEA! WDNMBA!
Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:41 PM
We don't need any more bloody acronyms.
Posted 30 March 2007 - 03:55 PM
Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:54 PM
It's because of you that babies are shot.FPT it is!
Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:55 PM
I vote this for best Zelda thread ever.
We've already said Shigeru Miyamoto never really cared about storyline as much as gameplay; being a games designer his priority was to make the adventures as engaging and playable for the audience as possible. That's why Zelda franchise is often considered the epitome of that specific genre.
Disregarding what the creators say shows us you don't care about a Zelda chronology in the first place.
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:00 PM
I did NOT have sex in public.We've had Fyxe... do that rude thing she usually does,
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:08 PM
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:10 PM
I did NOT have sex in public.
The split does seem like a cop out to me too. It's like the creators used it in order to relate more games back to OoT.
I don't see how a game can reference the split though? Since one reality will heve no knowledge that the other exists.
Edited by Chaltab, 30 March 2007 - 07:21 PM.
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:37 PM
It did not turn out as it was planned, I'm sure, but the streak of humor it got was teh awesome.Let's see. We've had someone compare Zelda Single-Timeliners to Holocaust deniers, and Godwin's Law didn't even kick in. We've had Fyxe... do that rude thing she usually does, and we've had two people at each others throats come to a vague truce. You may just be right. (Then again, I may be biased as I started the thread.)
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:43 PM
One could argue this has happened already.something involving Majora's dark tribe.
Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:50 PM
Posted 30 March 2007 - 11:24 PM
Agreed. I'm frankly tired of Ocarina of Time. I wrote a ZBlog article about that very thing towards the turn of this year. I'm hoping that Twilight is able to become the new basis for Zelda stuffs and that we get out of Ocarina mode.Can you prove it?
Hm, good point. Well, I am a sucker for crossovers. But I digress. And yeah, I hope the Zelda staff gets out of their OOT=GOD phase soon. I'm not disrespecting OOT by any means, but it's not the only game in the series, and it's not the only masterpiece in the series. Why not make a game that takes a cue from ALTTP or Majora's Mask? (And I mean a direct cue, like the Pyramid of Power or something involving Majora's dark tribe.)
This is true; you can't have a gun without you; then it'd just be "gn".It's because of you that babies are shot.
Posted 31 March 2007 - 12:42 AM
It did not turn out as it was planned, I'm sure, but the streak of humor it got was teh awesome.
Posted 31 March 2007 - 05:48 AM
*Tumbleweed*This is true; you can't have a gun without you; then it'd just be "gn".
Posted 31 March 2007 - 11:15 AM
Posted 31 March 2007 - 07:58 PM
I would like to see something just plain NEW. Maybe more games directed at the old ones, and that sort of stuff, but I just want something new.Agreed. I'm frankly tired of Ocarina of Time. I wrote a ZBlog article about that very thing towards the turn of this year. I'm hoping that Twilight is able to become the new basis for Zelda stuffs and that we get out of Ocarina mode.
Edited by CID Farwin, 31 March 2007 - 08:03 PM.
Posted 01 April 2007 - 12:27 PM
Posted 01 April 2007 - 01:06 PM
Edited by Duke Serkol, 01 April 2007 - 01:06 PM.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 03:17 PM
I'm still single timeline!
The idea that G-dorf's execution in TP was post-OoT is so ridiculous to me I can't even come up with proof. All's I'm gonna say is, they made a lot of stuff in TP identical or near-identical to OoT when it was meant to be the same exact thing. When they made it different, it wasn't supposed to be. This 'dorf is clearly meant to be transitional between the burly bearded windwaker-ganondorf and the babyfaced young wizard from OoT.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 03:26 PM
Didn't happen.the fact that Twilight Princess Ganondorf was literally just handed the Triforce of Power on his deathbed
Posted 02 April 2007 - 03:34 PM
Didn't happen.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 03:44 PM
Posted 02 April 2007 - 04:14 PM
I'll respond with a question of my own.
If he already had the Triforce of Power, why had he lost to Link at the top of Ganon's Tower? Why had he coughed up blood and collapsed? Why did he destroy the whole tower instead of turning into a demon and just throwing Link off the edge? Why did he crush himself in the ruins of his own tower before transforming?
Edited by Chaltab, 02 April 2007 - 04:15 PM.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 04:15 PM
I'll respond with a question of my own.
If he already had the Triforce of Power, why had he lost to Link at the top of Ganon's Tower? Why had he coughed up blood and collapsed? Why did he destroy the whole tower instead of turning into a demon and just throwing Link off the edge? Why did he crush himself in the ruins of his own tower before transforming?
Posted 02 April 2007 - 04:17 PM
Fyxe=right. In this case, at least.
Edited by Chaltab, 02 April 2007 - 04:18 PM.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 04:21 PM
And the idea that it was pre-OoT just plain doesn't work. Neither does it after TWW, or in relation to any other game. So, supposedly nonsensical theory, or nonexistent theory?The idea that G-dorf's execution in TP was post-OoT is so ridiculous to me I can't even come up with proof.
Funny that Link doesn't need the Master Sword to defeat Ganondorf in OoT, then.In the climax of Ocarina of Time, Link had the Triforce of Courage and the Master Sword.
Because they didn't know he had it, obviously.Why did the sages even try to excecute him?
Says who?it seems unlikely that he could have had it in the Child Timeline, because in that timeline he never entered the sacred realm.
Edited by Hero of Legend, 02 April 2007 - 04:30 PM.
Posted 02 April 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 02 April 2007 - 09:11 PM
I already explained in my previous post why her question is irrelevant.
Triforce of Courage + Master Sword > Triforce of Power > Sages of the Arbiter's Grounds
Posted 02 April 2007 - 09:14 PM
Posted 03 April 2007 - 01:34 AM
Posted 03 April 2007 - 02:45 PM
And the idea that it was pre-OoT just plain doesn't work. Neither does it after TWW, or in relation to any other game. So, supposedly nonsensical theory, or nonexistent theory?
Funny that Link doesn't need the Master Sword to defeat Ganondorf in OoT, then.
See, it's not like Ganondorf is invulnerable to anything but the Master Sword. Any weapon infused with sacred power, such as the Light Arrows or, presumably, the sages' blade would work as well. Hell, Wolf Link worked. It's just these things don't kill him, as we have seen numerous times, including TP.
Fair enough.Because they didn't know he had it, obviously.
So you honestly think that a group of ancient magical beings being capable of temporarily subduing a wizard-thief who can't even control his main power source is more absurd than the gods giving Ganondorf the Triforce when it's safely in the Sacred Realm? Really?
FDL is right. You have to understand that the Triforce splitting for no reason MAKES NO SENSE, and is not supported by any dialogue in the game whatsoever.
Reason for Ganondorf being collapsed by the tower: Deus ex machina to make a two-part final boss as well as a thrilling escape sequence, Triforce of Power be damned.