Vertiboy, on Apr 29 2007, 10:52 PM, said:
If Link were about to defeat Ganondorf, wouldn't he turn into Ganon to trumph Link's abilities? Again, you are making your point more and more moot because you are proving that it needs more and more fan fiction to work.
No, because he can't control the power of the gods after he's had it for seven and thus definetly wouldn't have control over it right after he got it. Plus, you're putting words in my mouth as well as inferring what I meant. You seem to have a habit of that. I never said how he was captured, but I said he was.
Quote
Here's the FF we have so far:
Link arrives after the Triforce split. Zelda comes back to Hyrule Castle, even though it was attacked, and will be attacked again by Ganondorf. Link tells Zelda about his adventure as an adult. Ganondorf comes to attack Hyrule Castle, but Link is there with the Triforce of Courage. Link defeats Ganondorf, and he is arrested. Well, that sound perfectly supported.
Or:
Link arrives before his adventure began (implied by Aonuma quote because of the other information in it). He talks to Zelda about Ganondorf, they decide to leave him alone, and their relationship with him takes a new direction (Aonuma quote). Years later (Aonuma quote), Ganondorf attacks Hyrule in order to establish dominion over the Sacred Realm (Twilight Princess). Ganondorf is arrested and sentenced to execution (Twilight Princess). I gave citations and all, and only one of those facts are implied.
Seriously, the elaborate fan fiction is unnecessary and not helping your side of the debate at all.
And your idiotic inferences aren't helping yours at all. I never said any of what you have said, I've simply said that nothing has actually proven what you say has been proven.
Quote
They did say that he invaded Hyrule in order to establish dominion over the Sacred Realm. Why would he want to establish dominion over a useless realm if he already knew that he had the ToP? You can't explain that without making up some fan fiction explaination, which, again, helps me to prove my point further.
No, because it doesn't say what you believe it said. It says that he led a band of thieves to get into the Sacred Realm. Then it says he was eventually captured. Though you
inferred that it said he was captured in the midst of it, that was never actually said one way or the other. If we go by OoT then the fact that he was captured because of his "fury and might" would imply that he already had the Triforce because prior to that he didn't show his might and instead was sneaky. But that doesn't really matter.
Quote
Here is more of what we have:
Link arrives after the Triforce split. Zelda comes back to Hyrule Castle, even though it was attacked, and will be attacked again by Ganondorf. Link tells Zelda about his adventure as an adult. Ganondorf comes to attack Hyrule Castle and even though he has the Triforce of Power, he wants to rule the Sacred Realm for some weird, unknown reason. Link is there with the Triforce of Courage. Link defeats Ganondorf, and he is arrested. Well, that sound perfectly supported.
Nice way of putting words in my mouth, you fool. You are once again inferring what I believe. Plus, your little interpretations have such an extreme bias it's sickening. If you want to debate, do it fairly.
Quote
MM's prologue says that he is. It doesn't matter if he does anything or not. If you want to get technical, though, he is a hero because he told Zelda that Ganondorf is a threat. You are automatically assuming that a hero is someone who physically fights some kind of evil. That is not true. Link warning Zelda about Ganondorf's potential threat makes him a hero. If Link told Zelda about his adventure in the adult timeline, then that story could also be passed down through the Hylian Royal Family. That doesn't necessarily have to be the case, though, because simply telling Zelda about Ganondorf could qualify Link to be a hero.
You forget that Zelda's father didn't even believe her when she said Ganondorf was evil. He's not going to believe some random kid, and thus history would end up the same way anyhow. Plus, if you by the way the games talk about said hero then you'd know it doesn't talk about it in the way you do.
Quote
Link did something in the child timeline. You just conveniently failed to remember that.
Sorta the way you fail in your attempts at "proving" things?
LionHarted, on Apr 29 2007, 10:57 PM, said:
Have fun beating Dark Lord Ganondorf without the Master Sword.
Considering the first time I beat him it was with the Biggoron's Sword, I did. Plus, I have a bunch of options with the Megaton Hammer and bottles.
Vertiboy, on Apr 30 2007, 12:50 PM, said:
In my post before this one, I proved that with all of the information given in OoT, TP, and Aonuma's quote that Link arrives before he met Zelda. If you debate that, you are immune to fact.
No, you didn't
prove anything, you
inferred a hell of [img]http://forums.legendsalliance.com/public/ALOT.png[/img]. Which is different.
Quote
TP itself implies that Link arrived after the Triforce split. It says that he was caught invading Hyrule in order to establish dominion over the Sacred Realm. If he already had the Triforce of Power, then what good would trying to rule the SR do? Honestly, I would like to see what excuse you whip out for this one. What canon reason would Ganondorf want to rule the SR, if there is no longer a Triforce in there?
See above. It never says he was caught in the middle of it, just that he had led a band of thieves to do so and was captured at some point.
Quote
The only reason I can think of would be that Link arrived before the Triforce split, and Ganondorf was not aware that he possessed the ToP.
Explain why he knew the words of the Triforce well enough to imitate them almost verbatim to Zant later on if he didn't know it, then.
Vertiboy, on Apr 30 2007, 01:00 PM, said:
Okay, so I quoted myself when I clearly proved it, but whatever...just see what you want to see.
No matter how many times you quote yourself, you didn't prove anything you pompous ass.
Quote
With all of that information, you can deduct roughly when Link arrived. Some people just don't have the capacity (not necessarily you) to put it all together because it is too complex for them.
Oh, you're a
condescending, pompous ass! It's a double whammy! Fact is, you didn't prve anything and you have so little brain capacity that you believe every word that comes out of your mouth is fact then I guess you're not one to point fingers, are you? And your "citations" are bullshit that you interpret in whatever way you want that suits your theory. None of them say what you wish they did, which is cold, hard proof that your theory is true.
Quote
Next time you disagree, like you don't think that I have disproved someone, give a response that isn't equivelent to just nuh-uh
!!!!! I thought that we were above this, people. It is nice to give someone a reason for disagreeing with them in a debate if you wish to be taken seriously.
Your not one to discuss "debate edicate". You're possibly one of the most rude, pompous assholes I've ever seen on the internet, and that's saying something. I've already mentioned why above. Maybe if you went to the trouble of doing more active debating rather than merely calling your interpretations "fact" I wouldn't say that.