Come again? If I understand you correctly, you are saying there are things that would somehow contradict what we learn in MM's intro? Like what? Not OoT itself, as both the adult and child ending has people that are aware of Link deeds and are sure to spread that knowledge (Zelda in particular). Not MM, which tells us that Link was remembered as a legend. Certinaly not TWW, where some people still think he will return and save the world from evil. And not TP, where he is remembered as the legendary hero. So, again, I kinda fail to see the problem.
No, you don't undderstand me correctly, actually. I'm saying exactly what your saying, almost verbatim. OTHER PEOPLE disagree, and say MM's opening is just meant for the player, and has no bearing on canon, something I disagree with. I think MM makes it quite clear that his deeds in OoT were known, and TP seems to make it likely that he also kept all of his adult time items. Other people are who I'm talking about, my beliefs are similar to your own.
Well, actually not the King, since he'd be dead by that time (I assume Ganondorf killed him in his first 'attack' on Hyrule Castle). And what Link warned the Hylians about would be nothing other than Ganondorf’s impeding conquest of Hyrule, which would start as soon as he returned from the Sacred Realm. Once Ganondorf returns, events play out as said in TP, with him rallying the Gerudo in a war against the Hylians, ending with his eventual defeat and banishment.
See, I agree there as well. Maybe not exactly like this, but mainly so. I think many of the events of the adult time may have happened in the CT, aside from Ganondorf being King of Hyrule. But I still think Bongo Bongo being released and other events possibly happened, as it seemed like nothing could prevent the events.
