
Moore Speaketh
#61
Posted 01 October 2004 - 03:35 PM
I was more impressed by it than Moore's attempts. Numbers, graphs and at one point he even sets out a methodology as to how he determines some of his facts. He's far more logical than Moore and thus makes a more convincing case.
The only blatant lie I could tell was the fact that he kept mentioning that this guy, called O'Reilly, had his face on the cover.... when the only face on the cover is blatantly Al Franken's.
I loved the back cover though. How they got a quote of Ian Hislop (editor of the Private Eye) saying "Fabulous" (coz he says that word quite a lot, apparently).
#62
Posted 01 October 2004 - 07:23 PM
#63
Guest_mysticdragon13_*
Posted 02 October 2004 - 09:55 AM
I think Wolf is right, you are confusing communism with socialism. You know our country is not a true democracy and has elements of socialism mixed up with it. So don't knock it till you know what you're talking about.D'aaaaaaaargh!
I lost my post! *sob sob* I had been working on it for nearly an hour!
And the pile of stuff to reply to it just getting higher and higher, like a bad game of Tetris. D'aaargh...
Um, Hero of Winds? My other fellow conservatives (if you're out there?) Somebody wanna help this? Even part of it? All this rampant Socialist nonsense shouldn't go uncountered. These people need HELP.
Gauntlet Announcer Voice: Red Socialists Need Help Badly! Green Conservative Is About To Die!
#64
Guest_SouthpawLink_*
Posted 10 October 2004 - 03:11 AM
http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-D...renheit-911.htm
Mr. Moore has seen the critique and responded to some of Mr. Kopel's points, but not all of them.
Also worth mentioning is that on October 5th, a DVD was released, titled Fahrenhype 9/11: Unraveling the Truth about Fahrenheit 9/11 & Michael Moore.
#65
Posted 10 October 2004 - 07:21 PM
#66
Posted 11 October 2004 - 10:44 AM
For the last time: "The Fahrenheit 9/11 Reader," currently available, and not all that expensive. Read it before attacking the film.
Considering who wrote it, I'm not sure I want to even look into this book.
#67
Posted 11 October 2004 - 11:04 AM
#68
Posted 11 October 2004 - 03:16 PM
It's basically just a massive bibliography. Plus, Moore won't corrupt you... if you thought you were right it wouldn't worry you. I read conservative stuff all tha time.
I read liberal stuff too. Like "Legends Alliance Forms > Legends Alliance > Controversial".

But I fail to see where a novelization of Moore's movie could give insight into the truth of his movie. Or lack thereof.
#69
Posted 15 October 2004 - 07:03 PM
I was amused by Franken's book til he went to Bob Jones University and showed what an elitist bunghole he really is. Those people were nothing but civil to him, but he based his whole opinion on the school on the nasty propaganda about it, and one bad line on their website that nobody at the actual school had any knowledge of. His son was a lot smarter ("Dad, they just have different beliefs than us.") Not that Franken cared. He was out on a crazy Nazi-hunt.
The only person he was right about was Ann Coulter, but it's hard not to be. The woman's crazy (kinda like a female, conservative Moore, really)
#70
Posted 15 October 2004 - 07:11 PM
#71
Posted 15 October 2004 - 07:37 PM
"Unless you're a Republican President."
Yep. That was sweet.
And I think the minority students at Bob Jones would be shocked to hear you say it's racist.
#72
Posted 15 October 2004 - 07:43 PM
Second, if he gets something wrong and appologizes, that doesn't mean he's a liar.
I'm holding you to that.
#73
Posted 15 October 2004 - 07:47 PM

I mean...sure...our spring breaks have occasionally involved naked people dancing in the streets around a campfire created from objects they stole from all the nearby stores, and every news crew in the state shows up here hoping for a piece of the action...but that's beside the point. >.>;
#74
Posted 15 October 2004 - 08:15 PM
I'm holding you to that.
HA! Ringed!
#75
Posted 15 October 2004 - 08:21 PM

#76
Posted 15 October 2004 - 08:23 PM
Not allowing inter-racial dating is, by any rational standard, racism. I don't care if they have a different belief system, that's disgusting.And I think the minority students at Bob Jones would be shocked to hear you say it's racist.
Who denied that he has an agenda? You don't have to lie to make a point, you know.And I think the minority students at Bob Jones would be shocked to hear you say it's racist.
#77
Posted 15 October 2004 - 09:42 PM
This little detail is frequently omitted by the propaganda machines who despise the Christian right. Keep trying, though. I actually had to get up to check on that one.
For the record, racism would imply that other races wouldn't be allowed on campus. They were. They just weren't allowed to date, which is merely an offshoot of a rather popular belief held by many Americans up til about the 70's, that the races shouldn't intermarry. Even my mom's still a leery of the idea, though she admits it's just the way she was raised. This isn't racism. It's just another bad belief (like women not being allowed to vote, or hatred of foreigners) that needed time to finish dying.
#78
Posted 15 October 2004 - 10:09 PM
Racism doesn't just mean the most extreme form. A dictator who doesn't kill anyone is still a fascist, nyet?
#79
Posted 15 October 2004 - 10:25 PM
Bob Jones merely had it on the books officially, but had been ignoring it for years. They just rescinded it when some P.C. thugs made a big deal about it.
Why, sure, a Nazi who doesn't hurt anyone is still a Nazi, and a communist leader who doesn't hurt anyone is... but I dabble in hypotheticals.