
Keep it to yourself
#1
Guest_History_*
Posted 08 June 2005 - 03:01 AM
They run around like, look at me, I'm gay. Why don't you respect me. You have to accept me. Give me attention, I'm gay. I mean, whatever you do in the privacy of your own house is your buisness, and as long as you aren't hurting other people, I really don't care. I DON'T CARE. So why are you running around making sure the whole world knows it.
I may not respect your decision, but I'm going to respect you as a person (untill you do something to lose that respect, like any other person). And just because I don't agree with you on the issue, I'm not running around saying, kill all gays, send them to jail or anything.
That gives me a good idea. I'm going to tell everybody what turns me on. I'm going to run around telling people my fetishes.
#2
Posted 08 June 2005 - 03:09 AM
#3
Posted 08 June 2005 - 06:47 AM
I put my openness in my signature because it's who I am, and I'm proud of it. Since I'm also a moderator of the life forum here, I put the fact that I am a bisexual in my signature so I don't have to repeat my entire schpiel to people.
I'm not extremely open. I'm open, but not to the point of flambuoyancy. I'm not asking people to pay attention to me, give me money, give me sympathy, or anything else. I just want them to have the knowledge. I don't use my sexuality as a lifeline in tough situations, unlike some homosexuals/bisexuals you may have encountered in the past.
If you have a problem with people and their openness about homosexuality, heterosexuality, or otherwise, please send a Private Message to any of our message board's administrators asking them to consider telling people to keep it in the closet. All I can tell you is that I am not breaking any rules by announcing my personality in my signature, and I am within the signature size limit. You may find my choice to announce my lifestyle annoying, but unless it is blatantly, flat-out insulting you and possibly causing you physical pain, no changes will be made.
Just to let you know, I have had this exact signature for several months now. The original signature included a picture defending Pro-Choice for abortion along with my bisexuality icon. Khuffie asked me to remove the Pro-Choice, since that is a very controversial thing that would actually cause me grief, and eventually the forum, but he allowed me to keep the bisexuality icon, and I have had it, with the rainbows, in my signature ever since.
#4
Posted 08 June 2005 - 09:17 AM
#5
Posted 08 June 2005 - 09:24 AM
#6
Posted 08 June 2005 - 09:51 AM
#7
Posted 08 June 2005 - 09:54 AM
#8
Posted 08 June 2005 - 09:57 AM
#9
Posted 08 June 2005 - 10:00 AM
They're just what we use to express opinions and ourselves quickly without the formality of explaining it constantly. (Like, Fizz is gay. Check. MJ is a single timeliner. Check. Vazor is crazy. Check. Husky loves wolves etc. etc.)
#10
Posted 08 June 2005 - 10:18 AM
#11
Posted 08 June 2005 - 10:22 AM
#12
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:08 AM
Lets be fair now. The only white pride gatherings I have ever seen involved toothless rednecks sporting white hoods and swastikas. They commonly burn crosses.The strange thing about all of this is that its fine to be proud of being gay or black or asian or whatever but if you're proud of being straight or white you get called a homophobe or a racist.
#13
Posted 08 June 2005 - 12:04 PM

#14
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:02 PM
You wanna know what I think. I think you just don't like gays because they're not in your control. After all, they have fun doing something that you don't approve of and nothing you say can stop them from continuing to do so. So you make up stupid generalizations and false justifications... because it gives you some sense of power. But what you do have power over is how you react to gays. Getty all pissy-pants over a silly sig shows you can't even control yourself. How sad.
As oppose to maybe he doesn't like the whole idea of homosexuality itself?
#15
Guest_History_*
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:10 PM
Know what, I'm proud to be white, male, and straight.
The strange thing about all of this is that its fine to be proud of being gay or black or asian or whatever but if you're proud of being straight or white you get called a homophobe or a racist. I for one am sick of gay people going round saying Im gay look at me, Im so great, do you have a problem that? Its like they want people to dislike them. The gay people who get the most respect are those who dont make a song and dance about it.
I think that people like that just need attention and controversy. They can't just live their life. No. They have to have chaos. They aren't satisfied otherwise. Oh and when I speak of gay's, I'm speaking of males and females. I mean anybody who's homo.
#16
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:29 PM
You think we're the ones who strive for controversy? That we're hungry for tearing down potential homophobes? That we're making a big deal about it? You're the one who decided to start this thread hitting on the subject in the first place. You directly made a comment against a member's sig, saying that kind of information is better kept to herself. not only that but something that is part of who she is. Thus you made a stand. Against her sig. Against her. Against others like her. In response, we made ours. If you didn't like how we responded then don't try to start anything to begin with.
Edit: Out of all fairness. My previous post did go too far. But still! There are [img]http://forums.legendsalliance.com/public/ALOT.png[/img] gays here at LA ([img]http://forums.legendsalliance.com/public/ALOT.png[/img] more than I had imagined) and I'm very protective of everyone of them. It's paternal instinct I guess.
#17
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:43 PM
Granted, I don't see much point mentioning your sexuality, religion, political affiliation, or what have you in your sig. And yes Zythe, sigs are like spam. They are pointless messages that suck bandwidth. It's like having commercials in between posts. I don't mind them that much, but some of the longer ones are annoying.
#18
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:49 PM
I just get pissed off when people find problems with gays drawing attention to themselves when straight guys (and some women) do way worse on a more frequent basis yet what the latter group does is percieved as normal and is tolerated while with the former it still isn't. Like I said, I'm sick with sexual advertisement of any sort.
#19
Posted 08 June 2005 - 11:55 PM
I'll probably address the issue more in-depth later.
#20
Posted 09 June 2005 - 01:00 AM
#21
Posted 09 June 2005 - 01:07 AM

#22
Posted 09 June 2005 - 03:31 AM
Y'know what I find kinda funny about the gay/bi issue, about teens specifically? That some who think they are aren't. Seriously. They find out that their body enjoys... contact... and doesn't care what gender it's coming from, and they suddenly decide that they're homosexual/bisexual. I'm not saying that this IS the case with anyone directly referenced here, I'm just saying it happens. Specifically, though... Jaina, some of those guys probably weren't really gay/bi. They just thought they were. Like I said, it happens.
I'll probably address the issue more in-depth later.
Yes. That happens and it's unfortunate that some people get stuck in a lifestyle that is targeted by much animosity just because they think the don't have any choice when in fact there is. And then there are people who are just curious. And some people flip-flop around because they just don't know what they want. And then there's guys who'd boink anything with a hole in it. But that's not the point. If you have sex with a member of your own sex and you like it you are gay by the strictest sense of the word. Whether you do it for meaningful relationships or not or if you decide later on that it's not your thing after all is totally irrellevant. And no, getting enjoyment from man-hugs doesn't make you gay. That's just stupid. Anyone who seriously thinks that should be shot.
Anyways. I know what I am. And more importantly, I know what I'm not. I don't have to fitt any stupid stereotypes just to justify what I am. Er... y'all can interpret that anyway you like.
#23
Posted 09 June 2005 - 07:31 AM
How many times have any of our homo/bisexual members (myself or otherwise) have used our sexuality to get attention outside of threads that specifically talk about sexuality?
Twinrova (lesbian member here that recently left) was the only other member aside from myself that let people know who she was via signature icons/images.
Sometimes homosexuals and bisexuals let people know who they are because the norm simply is to be straight. If we didn't let people know, we'd just be mistaken for another straight person, which is complete bullshit. We'd rather let people know and take the beef from it than have to correct people every time when they ask if we have a life partner of the opposite gender.
I'm bisexual. Half-straight, half-gay. Yes, I have a boyfriend currently, and he knows I'm comfortably open. I don't advertise it in the way I dress or act, but if people ask, I let them know. And in this forum, it's my choice to let people know before they ask.
History, if you really have such a hard time dealing with the fact that I'm open about my sexuality, please either talk to an administrator, or go into your user control panel, and disable signatures. That way you can browse threads easier knowing that you won't have to see rainbows in anyone's signature. But regardless of how much you complain about how it makes you feel uncomfortable, I'm not going to bend to anyone's will unless I am talked to by an administrator. As I have said before, the rainbows and icon have been in my signature for many months. Good luck getting anything done.
#24
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:23 AM
I don't dislike gay people, I dislike homosexuality. It doesn't appeal to me. At all.
Am I a homophobe?
#25
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:33 AM
Wait, he speaks up about something and he's a homophobe?
I don't dislike gay people, I dislike homosexuality. It doesn't appeal to me. At all.
Am I a homophobe?
Clearly. Hating the Sin but not the Sinner doesn't work. It's a contradiction in terms. A phobia is an irrational fear of something, although one can argue all fears are rational, as they are learnt through classical conditioning it's still has an irrational beginning. You may or may not be religious, but the reference to sin is something that describes what you stated rather well, at least I believe.
Following is to everyone:
I'm straight, probably not 100%, but no one is a hundred percent straight or gay. I am open about my sexuality, if someone asks, I say. Why shouldn't a homosexual person do that, or a bisexual for that matter.
Yes, those who run around in pink spandex and scream that they are gay, they can be annoying. But it's no more annoying than the latest rapper's video with half naked women waving their businesses around for those who are gay. Intolerance works both ways. In the western world we are lucky to have freedom of speech, to a degree, why not tell people who you are or what your opinions are. I don't like it when I see someone saying: "Go Fox Hunting!", as hunting is barbaric, but have I posted a topic saying how people like that are annoying and should be silenced? Nope. Because you've got to give and take a bit. What you see as normal may not be for someone else.
#26
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:41 AM
For one, I have to strongly disagree with that. I know a few gay guys. They're cool guys, but what they do with other guys is something I don't want to hear about, because I just find the whole idea of man to man wrong. Yet I am still able to get along with these guys without a problem. Hating the sin, but not the sinner DOES work, because liking someone for them themselves, i.e. personality, attitude, sense of humour, has nothing to do with who they get intimate with.
And for two, I'm not afraid of homosexuality. I know I'm not gay, I know others are gay. It doesn't scare me at all, I just find it unappealing.
And finally, on your terms, if a gay person dislikes heterosexuality, do you ever hear "heterophobe" thrown around? No. They're just really, really gay. Well, why can't we just be really, really straight?
My definition for a homophobe would be someone who doesn't like a person simply because they are gay. There is a difference between unappealing and offensive.
And one more thing. Rappers flaunting all their women is different from pink spandexters. They do that to go "look at me, I'm so hot and cool and can get whatever I want" rather than "look at me, I like women. I'm straight and super proud of it".
And to top off, no one said anything about them not being able to be open about it. The whole point was about those who unnecessarily flaunt it in the face of others.
#27
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:58 AM
So basically, you're saying it's impossible for me to like a person if a don't like their sexual preference?
For one, I have to strongly disagree with that. I know a few gay guys. They're cool guys, but what they do with other guys is something I don't want to hear about, because I just find the whole idea of man to man wrong. Yet I am still able to get along with these guys without a problem. Hating the sin, but not the sinner DOES work, because liking someone for them themselves, i.e. personality, attitude, sense of humour, has nothing to do with who they get intimate with.
And for two, I'm not afraid of homosexuality. I know I'm not gay, I know others are gay. It doesn't scare me at all, I just find it unappealing.
http://www.cogsci.pr....1?s=homophobia
One definition of homophobia, you do the math.
Actually, I know two hetrophobes. Two lesbians who hate straight people. Don't ask me why they hate me, you, and all straight people, but they do. It's just who they are. They can hate me for me being straight if they want. No skin off my nose.And finally, on your terms, if a gay person dislikes heterosexuality, do you ever hear "heterophobe" thrown around? No. They're just really, really gay. Well, why can't we just be really, really straight?
My definition for a homophobe would be someone who doesn't like a person simply because they are gay. There is a difference between unappealing and offensive.
Well, that depends. Often something unappealing usually turns to offensive. Like I find rappers unappealing, and more often than not, they are offensive to me.
I find that the two definitions you have used there are one and the same. If I can get women to flaunt their bodies all over me, then that makes me super straight and proud. No different from gay people in their spandex showing how gay they are.And one more thing. Rappers flaunting all their women is different from pink spandexters. They do that to go "look at me, I'm so hot and cool and can get whatever I want" rather than "look at me, I like women. I'm straight and super proud of it".
And to top off, no one said anything about them not being able to be open about it. The whole point was about those who unnecessarily flaunt it in the face of others.
And that was the whole point of my post. What you see as flaunting homosexuality can be seen in the eyes of a gay as no different than rappers/hip hop and the rest of the crap flaunting their sexuality, in videos, and getting paid.
#28
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:08 AM
And I still stand by my rapper situations. They are not the same. Ego and sexuality are not the same thing. They're flaunting the fact that they can get all these women, not the fact that they are getting women rather than men. They're not trying to prove to people that they are straight, they are simply talking themselves up and basically being arrogant and egotistical. The equivalent to that would be a gay person being arrogant because they are hot and can get as many guys/girls as they want, because of that fact, nothing to do with the fact that they are gay.
Hmmm...
#29
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:11 AM
It's not practical to go around hating people for every sin they commit because, after all, we're all a bunch of no-good sinning bastards anyways. And it's not practical to fall into the politically correct 'accept people no matter what' hole. It's not my place to condemn a person for what they do, but I do reserve the right to dislike what it is they do. And no, I'm not going to change my mind because of some stupid dictionary definition that didn't exist a decade or so ago.
#30
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:17 AM
Well the problems there tend to be the fact that I am different to every other person, like every other person is to each other. So regarding that definition, I'd have to say it's a simple load of bullshit, because I myself contradict it by my own attitude towards the situation. I am certainly not offended by homosexuality. You may be offended by rappers, but I am not offended by gayness, I just do not want any part in it.
So, you don't want to be gay, so you don't like homosexuality, but you like or don't mind homosexuals? This is something that I have trouble understanding. How can you hate something but love it too?
And I still stand by my rapper situations. They are not the same. Ego and sexuality are not the same thing. They're flaunting the fact that they can get all these women, not the fact that they are getting women rather than men. They're not trying to prove to people that they are straight, they are simply talking themselves up and basically being arrogant and egotistical. The equivalent to that would be a gay person being arrogant because they are hot and can get as many guys/girls as they want, because of that fact, nothing to do with the fact that they are gay.
Again, I still stand by my original comment. It's clear that if you've got a load of half naked women around you, dancing, and you're smiling, that you're straight. Just like in Elton John's video for I'm still Standing. Men = half naked == Elton John happy.
Hmmm...
And chav wasn't in the dictionary until recently. It is now. Just like muggle.
You've got to remember that saying straights can hate gays, but gays can't hate straights is like saying that only white people can be racist. Wrong.