
Dr. Who is awesome
#1
Posted 02 April 2010 - 11:53 PM
Well, I already said it. Only on Season 1 right now, hoping to catch up soon with everyone else.
#2
Posted 03 April 2010 - 02:50 AM
Wish I could tell you more. >.> But Badwolf, DoctorDonna, and the rest might hurt me for it.
#3
Posted 03 April 2010 - 08:45 AM
#4
Posted 03 April 2010 - 11:53 AM
#5
Posted 03 April 2010 - 12:31 PM
So far though, David Tennant is my favorite of all the cast Doctors xD
#6
Posted 03 April 2010 - 02:41 PM
#7
Posted 03 April 2010 - 03:37 PM
#8
Posted 03 April 2010 - 04:09 PM
PS: This episode also wins the award for "Worst excuse to get a woman to dress provactively".
#9
Posted 03 April 2010 - 06:21 PM
#10
Posted 04 April 2010 - 09:50 AM
The above post wins the award for "Most unqualified person to misspell a word while hating everything"
*sticks tongue out*
Oh, and I forgot to mention that Mark Smith's Doctor is a horrible rip-off of David Tennant, although I blame the scriptwriters for simply not bothering to change the character. There is literally no difference between what they say or how they act.
Edited by Raien, 04 April 2010 - 12:36 PM.
#11
Posted 05 April 2010 - 07:04 PM
Raien, if you want to watch the most horrible Doctor Who episode then try and find Love And Monsters. That is painful to watch.
#12
Posted 06 April 2010 - 12:36 AM
As far as the newest episode was concerned, I honestly thought that this was far from the worst episode of Doctor Who out there.
I was bracing myself for all sorts of creepier things to happen once we realized how the monster was altering reality (without giving any spoilers), ready for it to be something akin to Blink. Speaking of which, WOO FOR THE WEEPING ANGELS, I can't wait to see them return! It's weird. I love the Cybermen, the Daleks, and all their lot. But the Lonely Assassins were by far the freakiest evil to hit the series, in my opinion. Plus we're getting River Song back! In at least two serial (each two episodes), so I wonder how close they'll become this season.

Having a kissagram in the show doesn't bother me a whole lot. To be fair, Jackie Tyler (Rose's mother) dressed like that on a daily basis and was twice Amy's age. As Karen Gillan said in an interview, she was allowed to look at a large wardrobe to choose what she felt most comfortable in, and settled on mini-skirts on her own. She feels that there's nothing perverse about it, as you'll see plenty of young girls walking down the street dressed like that. She's trying to portray an absolutely normal, perky young girl. It's not as though the Doctor looks like he has the hots for her, either -- he wants her to return to being a little girl again at heart by following him, and disapproves of her job and even her shorter name of "Amy" rather than Amelia.
And in response to people's reactions to her being this young girl following around a somewhat charming Doctor, lead writerSteven Moffat had to say:
The truth is, old "Doctor Who" was an entirely sexless series. The Doctor wasn't the only sexless character among a whole lot of sexually motivated ones. The Brigadier never got a date either, and no one bothered to mention it — neither did Sarah Jane Smith. It was that kind of show, as a lot of shows were in those days.
When "Doctor Who" came back, it had to fit into modern television. The question is: would a young girl hanging out with this older, dangerously attractive, mad, charming, brilliant man, maybe now and then notice? She would. That's human nature.
Are we really supposed to be believe back in the day that Tegan never had a look at The Doctor, even when he was Peter Davison? That Sarah Jane Smith never thought about that charismatic, older Tom Baker as being really not bad? It would happen. You have to address it, and you can't ignore it.
I would say of the old show that there's always that sort of latent romance going on. It's never expressed, but when Jon Pertwee says goodbye to Jo Grant, he doesn't look too pleased about it. He doesn't look too pleased that she's run off with someone she haplessly describes as a "younger version" of him. He's clearly cheesed off and it's not the reaction of a proud parent.
So the element is there, but as to how we do it this time, that is really centrally and importantly part of the story of this series — so it's unwise to tell a story before you start.
#13
Posted 18 April 2010 - 02:15 PM
And the Weeping Angels return next episode! HOORAY!
#14
Posted 19 April 2010 - 01:39 AM
#15
Posted 19 April 2010 - 09:00 AM
#16
Posted 19 April 2010 - 04:21 PM
Remember the first episode of this series, Amy waited for the Doctor to come back and he didn't. Then at the end of the episode it showed the young Amy waiting and you heard the TARDIS arriving.
I smell a paradox.
#17
Posted 19 April 2010 - 04:41 PM
#18
Posted 20 April 2010 - 01:00 PM
*claps hands erratically* River Soooong. ^___^
Spoiler
The next episode looks amazing River + weeping angels, hell yes.
Smith is a bit too similar to Tennant for my liking so i hope he'll evolve as a character as he 'gets used to' his new body.
#19
Posted 20 April 2010 - 02:16 PM
That said, it's entirely possible that everyone working on the show is still getting their feet wet in the shallow end of the pool and thaat they're trying to stay with what's familiar before really branching out on their own. This is Steven Moffat's first season as main writer, Adam Smith and Andrew Gunn's first season directing the show, Matt Smith's first time as the Doctor. Each is trying to fill themselves into spots that literally several generations have grown to know, love, and be very protective over. I imagine that for now they have to feel that if they stray too far from doing things exactly as they have been, all of Britain may bring out the torches and pitchforks. Give them a few episodes to see if Matt gets his bearing and changes up the personality. We already know he has a few quirks: the tweed suit, fish sticks and custard, he clearly hates smoking.
As I already said in my previous post, I'm with the party of folk who think the crack and Amy are connected. Think it's going to be a paradox related to the first episode (I personally took it as that the little girl inside of her finally got her wish, not that little Amelia actually had the Doctor come back for her on time)? Or that somehow Amy is or will become more than she seems? Like Rose being BadWolf or the DoctorDonna, are we going to come to a ridiculous revelation by the end of the season that she has some form of ridiculous power behind her...or worse yet, that her existence is a danger to time and space?
#20
Posted 20 April 2010 - 05:25 PM
1. Rose is the Bad Wolf, destroys all Daleks
2. Torchwood opens the Void, destroys all Daleks
3. The Master is Prime Minister
4. DoctorDonna destroys all Daleks
4.5 The Master and the Time Lords come back for a short while
5. The TARDIS we hear is actually The Rani's TARDIS who abducts young Amy to create a paradox for some reason or another causing cracks in spacetime.

#21
Posted 20 April 2010 - 10:04 PM
#22
Posted 25 April 2010 - 09:47 PM
...poor Bob.
#23
Posted 26 April 2010 - 09:46 AM
Atmospheric, good fun and a lot of ideas, nice change from the Doctor hanging about on Earth, he needs to visit more planets. I also loved the Clerics, and yes poor Bob, more scared than sacred. I do tend to think double episodes naturally end up much better written too. This episode also cleared up some fears I had about Smith being Tennant Mk II as he much more of his own personality.
Oh and anyone else notice that in the drop ship thing that Amy gets trapped in has the space suits from the Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead?
#24
Posted 03 May 2010 - 07:24 PM
..now it's just a matter of that little crack in time. Oh, and trying to have your way with the Doctor. Oh my.
#25
Posted 09 May 2010 - 05:17 AM
Yeah the first part of that episode just aired, cos our stations suck.
Edited by Lazurukeel, 09 May 2010 - 05:18 AM.
#26
Posted 09 May 2010 - 11:08 AM
"Coloured Daleks are coming over here and taking our jobs!" - Claims ordinary Dalek
Edited by Raien, 09 May 2010 - 11:08 AM.
#27
Posted 09 May 2010 - 05:57 PM
Once again I liked the latest episode, Vampires in Venice. It was full to the brim with plot holes and shitty CGI but I find myself not caring. I'm loving Matt Smith as the Doctor. I don't miss Tennant at all even though I thought I would. I really hope he sticks around for a good long run because I think he might become *my* Doctor.
Normally it's your first Doctor which you like the best, but mine was Paul McGann and whilst I'd like him to come back at some point to show the 8 to 9 regen, his one and only appearance wasn't enough for him to be my favourite.
#28
Posted 09 May 2010 - 08:41 PM
As always, I'm eager as heck for the next episode. With every detail of that crack I get more excited to figure out why it's happening!
#29
Posted 10 May 2010 - 07:28 AM
Of the three new Doctors, I still think Tennant is the best, simply because he has a more distinctive/entertaining personality than Christopher Eccleston, and I still have no idea what to make of Matt Smith's performance. I still feel he's trying to channel Tennant with those "rushed thoughts/plans" moments at the end of each episode (which, btw, I find incredibly annoying).
#30
Posted 16 May 2010 - 01:28 AM
Apparently, Tennant was in Goblet of Fire and also in Hamlet with Patrick Stewart.