99 replies to this topic

[Zola Revolution]

I don't know, I can think of way to link all maps. What I can't link together are the castles' appearances. The one in the MFT games is the same as the castle in OT. The castle in TW is the same as the one in FS+. These stories go far apart from one another.

[MikePetersSucks]

I don't know, I can think of way to link all maps.

Lies, for that way lies madness.

[Zola Revolution]

Again sure, that is your opinion. However, you have not seen my work on that. Yes, I do see what you mean when you imply that can't be done. It was not a lie that I did find a way to link the maps. Of course, what you mean to say is "I don't think there is a way to link the maps. How did you go about this, anyway?" right? If not, well, you could at least present it as opinion that I told a lie. But you know...

[MikePetersSucks]

Greater sages than you hath tried in vain, youngling, and in their wake was left gibbering fools and madmen of malcontent. For those wayward souls, death is the gods' mercy, for they art lost to us. Once you start down the dark path of geography-theorizing, forever shall it rule thine destiny.

[Zola Revolution]

I think I said it best earlier:

There are thousands of different timeline theories and rarely are two or three between people are the same. I know mine isn't absolute and it may not be close to what the creators had, but I doubt yours is any closer, either.

and

...instead of shoving words into my mouth, how about read all of what I wrote instead of the parts you find interesting. However, isn't that the American way, only see what you want to see; but I digress.
My timeline theory is not absolute. It is my theory; not fact.

About the geography linking, I can link them all together, but I don't actually think that they all do link together. I can also link them together with the split timeline. However, I don't make that a large part of my projects nor do I think that the creators put the timeline together the way that I have.

T-H-E-O-R-Y: Theory, go look it up; since you obviously need to.

Edited by リンクの獰猛な神, 27 August 2009 - 02:53 PM.

[Raien]

Random new theorist,

"It's just an opinion" is not an excuse to avoid criticism. If you can't accept your faults, you cannot grow as a person (or in this case, as a theorist).

[Zola Revolution]

I don't avoid criticism. There is a lot that I do with my theories away from the keyboard. Now, if you all want some kind of play-by-play or around-the-clock coverage of what I change in my theories, I'm sorry. I am not that committed to this website. I don't think I would do that for any website. The only way for anyone to know all the changes in my theories and such, you'd have to know me personally. It really is just people's opinions here and everywhere else in the real world when it is unofficial information. It is all just theory when it it not confirmed and/or discussed by the creators.

Now, if we could get off the topic of me for once and discuss what this thread was intended for; that would be great!

Edited by リンクの獰猛な神, 27 August 2009 - 05:39 PM.

[Fin]

The whole point of presenting theories is to stimulate discussion. Besides, some theories are more worthy than others. For example, the theory of gravity isn't nearly as compelling as the fact theory that we are all being pressed down by the Flying Spaghetti Monster's noodly appendages.

[Raien]

Responding to every criticism with "Let me have my opinions!" sounds like defensiveness and denial. If you are in fact taking criticism into account, then it's completely unnecessary to talk back in that way. Just say something like "Point taken", because otherwise all you're doing is stirring up arguments.

[Zola Revolution]

Point Taken.