That's a rather egotistical thought. I don't buy it. I really doubt anyone even gives a monkeys or barely even notices 'us timeliners'.
Of course they do. Aonuma has pledged to solve the timeline, and we already have tons and tons of details and easter eggs implemented specifically for fans that would bother with them. Shad, I simply consider to be our representative in the game.
And don't think I'm being patronizing. I have little good to say about this 'group' of ours. Still, we are both posting here, so I assume we are in fact 'timeliners'.
Are historians not allowed to exist in Zelda games unless they're a parody of a small, western-based portion of the fanbase?
They could have made him less, you know, wrong. And western-based? Is that why Aonuma mentions the timeline in every interview with the Japanese press?
Besides, if Shad WAS a parody, then surely your opinion on Shad's place in the timeline should not be trusted, for you are a 'timeliner'. It's a paradox, you can't win.
I am a fan, who might be either wrong or right about this. I think I have enough evidence to suspect that I am right, however.
Even if he was designed to poke fun at us timeliners, adding in a completely outrageous fact to completely throw us off-base would do the job better than making some sources uncredible. After all, if Shad is uncredible, who knows who else is uncredible?
Isn't that what this is? In every game since ALttP we have been told the Hylians are the chosen people of the gods. They were created by the goddesses, in their image, and were the only race capable of communing directly with them. Now Twilight Princess tells us this is not so.
Now, that is a pretty big turnaround in itself, but the way this is presented definitely makes me wonder. See, Shad (and Rusl) are right about some things: The Oocca certainly exist, they did built the City in the Sky and (helped build the) Temple of Time. But Shad is also wrong about a lot of things: He doesn't know what the Oocca really are or if they even exist, he has no idea how the ancient statues work, and he himself admits he is simply theorizing and has been wrong before (as was his father, if I recall). Overall, he is presented as a good-hearted but confused historian. You can't just trust him even if he isn't a parody.
But there is also the way the game presents the Oocca. Those 'wise and enlightened' creatures? Yeah, just comical relief character Ooccoo and her ilk. This was definitely meant to throw off the player. The fact that the Oocco, even after this just don't seem very smart or capable at all isn't exactly helping.
So, I dunno about you, but I say its all just a big joke. Nothing wrong with that, and the Oocca accomplish what they were meant to, but I don't believe this 'creation' stuff was ever meant to be serious.
Edited by Hero of Legend, 03 May 2007 - 03:28 PM.