
ivyjane
#1
Posted 03 September 2005 - 07:20 AM
#2
Posted 03 September 2005 - 07:41 AM
#3
Posted 03 September 2005 - 08:27 AM
#4
Posted 03 September 2005 - 08:28 AM
#5
Posted 03 September 2005 - 10:07 AM
#6
Posted 03 September 2005 - 10:13 AM
#7
Posted 03 September 2005 - 10:30 AM
#8
Posted 03 September 2005 - 11:56 AM
And yeah, advertisement is still illegal, but don't charge her/him/it/bob for something they didn't do.
#9
Posted 03 September 2005 - 12:10 PM
#10
Posted 03 September 2005 - 12:46 PM
#11
Posted 03 September 2005 - 03:28 PM
...okay, that made no sense whatsoever. Ignore Chik. x.x
#12
Posted 05 September 2005 - 05:32 AM
Nonetheless, Vet was banning them for the action committed, not the term it is classed under. So it's not exactly "banning them for something they didn't do".
#13
Posted 05 September 2005 - 04:14 PM
And dammit, when the hell did I turn into the Devil's Advocate? I'm shutting up now.
THEY WEREN'T TROLLING! *stalks off*
#14
Posted 05 September 2005 - 05:05 PM