
Legend of the Fairy?
#1
Posted 02 April 2005 - 06:33 PM
#2
Posted 02 April 2005 - 06:34 PM
#3
Posted 02 April 2005 - 06:36 PM
#4
Posted 02 April 2005 - 06:45 PM
#5
Posted 02 April 2005 - 07:33 PM
It is said that long ago, a boy garbed in green known as the Hero of Time saved
this land. However, on a certain island, there is also the story of the fairy
who saved that hero...
It is said that the Hero of Time met the fairy in the midst of his travels.
The fairy appeared before the Hero, who had found himself lost in darkness.
With a mystic power, it would float in midair, dancing above his head like a
burst balloon.
After the fairy handed the lost Hero a map, it flew off as quickly as it had
appeared. Better able to foresee places of danger than the Hero, the fairy
marked them on a map. The Legend goes on to say the quest of the Hero of Time
was saved by this plump figure...
Fairies live for thousands of years... but this odd fairy was a bit different.
This mystical fairy was born near a lake, and when he met the Hero, he was but
35. Beyond that, there is little known about that fairy...
The little-known Legend of the Fairy's 35th Birthday
On one island they celebrate one's 35th birthday with a green coat and red
pants. They do this in the hopes of becoming like the legendary fairy, Tingle.
-
#6
Posted 02 April 2005 - 10:10 PM
#7
Guest_Kishi_*
Posted 02 April 2005 - 10:27 PM
#8
Posted 03 April 2005 - 12:01 AM
#9
Posted 03 April 2005 - 10:29 AM
#10
Posted 03 April 2005 - 01:32 PM
#11
Posted 03 April 2005 - 09:15 PM
#12
Posted 03 April 2005 - 09:18 PM
#13
Posted 03 April 2005 - 10:32 PM

#14
Posted 04 April 2005 - 02:27 PM
#15
Posted 05 April 2005 - 03:45 PM
MM isn't just another part of the same globe as Hyrule, and it isn't another planet either. It is seperate in every way, so a split in the timeline may not effect it at all. Hence, this statement cannot be treated as proof for a single timeline.
Mohammed Ali
#16
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:44 PM
When there's that much circumstantial evidence for it, I'd say it's more likely than not.
The only thing going against it is the "Termina is a kind of parallel world"(possibly paraphrased) quote from the MM box, which is far from definitive proof in the opposite direction.
What is it with timeliners nowadays calling everything easter eggs?
If we did that to everything that ever posed a threat to our timelines, then we'd have nothing left to back them up.
#17
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:45 PM
I don't think this necesseraly disproves MM and WW are in different timelines. Not only could it just be an easter egg used to explain how Tingle came back after MM, but remember MM is in another universe altogether. There is every possibility that it is completely removed from time in Hyrule altogether.
MM isn't just another part of the same globe as Hyrule, and it isn't another planet either. It is seperate in every way, so a split in the timeline may not effect it at all. Hence, this statement cannot be treated as proof for a single timeline.
Mohammed Ali
That's quite a bit of fanfiction there and not even slightly implied in the game. The simplest explanation is usually the best.
#18
Posted 05 April 2005 - 05:49 PM
It would also be fanfic to say that MM takes place in a universe that is definately linked to the time structure of Hyrule as it's not even slightly implied in the game. The fact remains that we simply don't know how Termina and Hyrule are linked other than they are completely different universes. If a timesplit occured during OoT it may have effected Termina as well, but maybe not, we don't know at all. Hence, such a quote is left as redundant.That's quite a bit of fanfiction there and not even slightly implied in the game. The simplest explanation is usually the best.
lol. I agree with the easter egg thing you said, which is why I gave another explination as to why this is not solid proof at all. However, note that the postman and other connections happen because of game creators and not so much a link in the storyline. I don't think anyone here believes that the Rito postman is a desendant of both a Zora from Hyrule and a human from another dimention. Also note that he comes in TMC as well, so if you do want to relate them together, now you can.That's one hell of an easter egg if ever I saw one, plus that would make the rito-MM postman resemblance, and the allusion to them being related in the figurine descriptions easter eggs too.
When there's that much circumstantial evidence for it, I'd say it's more likely than not.
The only thing going against it is the "Termina is a kind of parallel world"(possibly paraphrased) quote from the MM box, which is far from definitive proof in the opposite direction.
What is it with timeliners nowadays calling everything easter eggs?
If we did that to everything that ever posed a threat to our timelines, then we'd have nothing left to back them up.
Fact is that Nintendo reuse ideas in games all the time. Try explaining how LA happens without any easter eggs and that will tell you how much Zelda games overflow with them.
Mohammed Ali
#19
Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:20 PM
And Zelda games have all kinds of cameos and eggs of Easter. So I pretty much agree that most of the cameos like Malon and Talon in TMC were just Easter eggs and not meant to affect the timeline.
#20
Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:33 PM
Although I made a point about the Easter eggs being common in Zelda, I disagree with Malon and Talon being Easter eggs as well. To me they serve to show TMC came after OoT and before WW. When I disregarded the Fairy quote, it wasn't on the basis of it being an Easter Egg either, but because it had no stable reference point (different universes and all).And Zelda games have all kinds of cameos and eggs of Easter. So I pretty much agree that most of the cameos like Malon and Talon in TMC were just Easter eggs and not meant to affect the timeline.
Mohammed Ali
#21
Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:43 PM
It would also be fanfic to say that MM takes place in a universe that is definately linked to the time structure of Hyrule as it's not even slightly implied in the game. The fact remains that we simply don't know how Termina and Hyrule are linked other than they are completely different universes. If a timesplit occured during OoT it may have effected Termina as well, but maybe not, we don't know at all. Hence, such a quote is left as redundant.
If one game references a previous game's plot then the implication is simply that that the game takes place after the referenced game. Once again the simplest answer is usually the correct one. If they wanted us to think that Termina was a dimension that connected two alternate timelines created at the end of Ocarina of Time then they would have told us so.
lol. I agree with the easter egg thing you said, which is why I gave another explination as to why this is not solid proof at all. However, note that the postman and other connections happen because of game creators and not so much a link in the storyline. I don't think anyone here believes that the Rito postman is a desendant of both a Zora from Hyrule and a human from another dimention. Also note that he comes in TMC as well, so if you do want to relate them together, now you can.
Fact is that Nintendo reuse ideas in games all the time. Try explaining how LA happens without any easter eggs and that will tell you how much Zelda games overflow with them.
The Legend of the Fairy referenced the PLOT of Majora's Mask and connected it to The Wind Waker. If you're going to write that off then you may as well write off all of the references to Ocarina of Time being "just Easter eggs" and "reused ideas".
#22
Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:45 PM
#24
Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:31 PM
#25
Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:39 PM
#26
Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:41 PM
#27
Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:49 PM
#28
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:12 PM
That would usually be the case if it were in the same universe. Fact is it's not so the statement isn't proof. You have to assume LOADS about space and time to make your explination work. The same could be said about mine, though I think it is the most simple as it assumes both universes are unrelated in any way.If one game references a previous game's plot then the implication is simply that that the game takes place after the referenced game. Once again the simplest answer is usually the correct one. If they wanted us to think that Termina was a dimension that connected two alternate timelines created at the end of Ocarina of Time then they would have told us so.
I'm going to answer this by quoting myself as it seems you aren't reading my posts.The Legend of the Fairy referenced the PLOT of Majora's Mask and connected it to The Wind Waker. If you're going to write that off then you may as well write off all of the references to Ocarina of Time being "just Easter eggs" and "reused ideas".
So yes, it cannot be refered to as an Easter Egg which I already said (and I said it before as well).When I disregarded the Fairy quote, it wasn't on the basis of it being an Easter Egg either, but because it had no stable reference point (different universes and all).
What references to the Great Flood?If the Legend of the Fairy was written by Tingle before he knew of the Great Flood, how do you explain the references it makes to the Great Flood?
Mohammed Ali
#29
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:38 PM
#30
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:38 PM
That would usually be the case if it were in the same universe. Fact is it's not so the statement isn't proof. You have to assume LOADS about space and time to make your explination work. The same could be said about mine, though I think it is the most simple as it assumes both universes are unrelated in any way.
If it was anything more complicated than simply "Wind Waker takes place after Majora's Mask" then why didn't they tell us so? The fact that they didn't suggests that it wasn't anything more complicated than that.