
What was first... Ganon or Ganondorf ?
#1
Guest_oni-alexander_*
Posted 26 November 2004 - 05:20 PM
I think Ganon is not a physical person, I think him as an evil force result of that:
Triforce of Power + a greedy soul=Ganon.
Easy, no, so Ganon only manifests with this two elemements...in theory The Ganon is our Dark side powered-up
Ganondorf is just a man son of TWINROVA, not Koume or Kotake, with evil heart
What was first...well as far as I know Ganondorf borns and in his adulthood he manifested His Ganon
:Linkgif:
#2
Posted 26 November 2004 - 06:14 PM
By the way, Twinrova is Ganon's surrogate mother, not his actual mother.
#3
Posted 27 November 2004 - 01:11 PM
#4
Posted 27 November 2004 - 07:35 PM
#5
Posted 27 November 2004 - 08:10 PM
#6
Posted 27 November 2004 - 08:32 PM
Yea, this topic is pointless. like pretty much all the topics you make. But I'll answer. -.-; Since Ganon is hinted at being inprisoned in the Trident from FSA, then we have reason to believe Ganon was some sort of primordial evil and Ganondorf simply unleashed it.
Thanks for the spoiler <_<
#7
Posted 27 November 2004 - 09:50 PM
#8
Posted 27 November 2004 - 11:36 PM
#9
Posted 28 November 2004 - 01:45 PM
#10
Posted 28 November 2004 - 05:43 PM
Anyway, to comment on the original post, Twinrova is only Ganon's surrogate mother, it would be kind of wierd to imagine a fused person having a baby (ie. two seperate babies fused? two seperate fathers and mothers? who does it inherit from etc.) that's why all the DBZ/GT or "AF" fanfiction my mates at school did sucked. 'Gogeta has a son with Bulma and they have a kid clamed Gobreifta'. Utter crap that was.
#11
Posted 28 November 2004 - 07:51 PM
Nyet, Ganondorf ALREADY had an evil heart, and grabbed the Triforce of Power in is fit of madness after the door of time was opened. The Ganondorf became the Evil Demon thing, which fully manifested itself from the end of OoT onward. He still used the form of Ganondorf, though, along with several others, in WW and aLttP and so on.
And this is different from what I said how? I just said, from the point that his MORTAL BODY was slain, the big beast came out and he's been indestructible ever since. And of course he looks like his old self, he still is. He's now indestructible, and no longer human, thus Ganon, not Ganondorf....I think. Maybe I just need to go to bed.
#12
Guest_Darkseid_*
Posted 01 December 2004 - 11:52 AM
#13
Posted 01 December 2004 - 02:38 PM
#14
Posted 02 December 2004 - 08:17 AM
#15
Posted 02 December 2004 - 12:09 PM
I thought this was going to be a deep, theory-packed thread about Davo and Mario Jr.'s argument that Ganon and Ganondorfy are seperate entities. Instead, it's a speculation/assumption/fanfiction parade.
Anyway, to comment on the original post, Twinrova is only Ganon's surrogate mother, it would be kind of wierd to imagine a fused person having a baby (ie. two seperate babies fused? two seperate fathers and mothers? who does it inherit from etc.) that's why all the DBZ/GT or "AF" fanfiction my mates at school did sucked. 'Gogeta has a son with Bulma and they have a kid clamed Gobreifta'. Utter crap that was.
I don't know if I even deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Davogones....
Anyways, I don't really know what to make of the whole Ganon/Ganondorf thing. I just assumed he was a man who was currupted by his own greed which turned him into the Ganon we today. In OoT we see the first transistion from Ganondorf and Ganon and we see that Ganon is used to distriguish between his demonic form from his human form. In TWW, we see the two names interchanged freely. In LttP he's just called Ganon but some still remembered that he was once called Ganondorf. In LOZ Ganondorf was all forgotten and all everyone knew was Ganon. And that was fine. What happened to it? FSA did!
FSA turned everything I knew upside down and made me really rethink what I thought I knew about Ganon. The first "twist" was that Ganon turned out to be the one behind all the chaos not Vaati. No big surprise since that part was already spoiled for me. But then they start treating Ganon and Ganondorf like two seperate beings which didn't really sit well with me. Finally the real kicker came in when Zelda recognized Ganon as an ancient demon while Ganondorf is man who lived in THAT time period. Honestly I don't know what to make of that. Both ALttP and Loz are very clear of Ganon's origins as a currupted theif, not a premordial evil that had existed since the dawn of time. Am I supposed to just disregard all that and accept that Ganon came fiorst and Ganondorf is a human extension of him? Or is theresomething else I'm missing? I don't know. The only solution I could think of was that the Ganondorf we see in the FSA is not the same as in OoT but rather a reincartion and/or descendant of Ganondorf I. He finds out about the Trident of Darkness and goes on a serch to find it but is then possesed by his own ancestor. Probably not the best theory out there. But I refuse to believe that Nintendo would intentionally disregard something THAT vital to the Zelda storyline.
#16
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:40 PM
At this point, a good, overall timeline is impossible, IMHO.
#17
Posted 02 December 2004 - 06:08 PM
#18
Posted 03 December 2004 - 09:37 AM
#19
Posted 03 December 2004 - 10:13 AM
#20
Guest_Darkseid_*
Posted 03 December 2004 - 09:06 PM
Also I think that the Wind Waker and Four Swords Adventures have not hurt the timeline, but rather that it is growing in story, and old thoughts of timelines must be thrown out, and new ones should be suggested. One just has to really think this through, and even if there are some loops here and there, we know that there are going to be more Zelda games to fill in the gap, so what's the big deal here.
#21
Posted 05 December 2004 - 01:08 AM
I don't know if I even deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Davogones....
Anyways, I don't really know what to make of the whole Ganon/Ganondorf thing. I just assumed he was a man who was currupted by his own greed which turned him into the Ganon we today. In OoT we see the first transistion from Ganondorf and Ganon and we see that Ganon is used to distriguish between his demonic form from his human form. In TWW, we see the two names interchanged freely. In LttP he's just called Ganon but some still remembered that he was once called Ganondorf. In LOZ Ganondorf was all forgotten and all everyone knew was Ganon. And that was fine. What happened to it? FSA did!
FSA turned everything I knew upside down and made me really rethink what I thought I knew about Ganon. The first "twist" was that Ganon turned out to be the one behind all the chaos not Vaati. No big surprise since that part was already spoiled for me. But then they start treating Ganon and Ganondorf like two seperate beings which didn't really sit well with me. Finally the real kicker came in when Zelda recognized Ganon as an ancient demon while Ganondorf is man who lived in THAT time period. Honestly I don't know what to make of that. Both ALttP and Loz are very clear of Ganon's origins as a currupted theif, not a premordial evil that had existed since the dawn of time. Am I supposed to just disregard all that and accept that Ganon came fiorst and Ganondorf is a human extension of him? Or is theresomething else I'm missing? I don't know. The only solution I could think of was that the Ganondorf we see in the FSA is not the same as in OoT but rather a reincartion and/or descendant of Ganondorf I. He finds out about the Trident of Darkness and goes on a serch to find it but is then possesed by his own ancestor. Probably not the best theory out there. But I refuse to believe that Nintendo would intentionally disregard something THAT vital to the Zelda storyline.
Definitely, FS Adventures is an early game, so why if the people refer to him as Ganon in late games he is refered as Ganon in FSA by his followers who say that he will return? Well, it's obvious, because Ganondorf hasn't appeared before, that supports my opinion: Ganon is an ancient demon who's independent from Ganondorf, and Ganondorf is just a simple man that Ganon uses as a puppet.
#22
Guest_Darkseid_*
Posted 05 December 2004 - 05:12 PM
Definitely, FS Adventures is an early game, so why if the people refer to him as Ganon in late games he is refered as Ganon in FSA by his followers who say that he will return? Well, it's obvious, because Ganondorf hasn't appeared before, that supports my opinion: Ganon is an ancient demon who's independent from Ganondorf, and Ganondorf is just a simple man that Ganon uses as a puppet.
I still think you are a bit confused here. Who was the one who stole the dark mirror? Why the White Shrine Maiden says Ganondorf did. Was Ganondorf mentioned in FSA as a gerudo in the FSA game? Yes he was. He lived in the Desert of Doubt and his fellow race considered him an outcast and a betrayer. The White Shrine and Red Shrine Maidens ponder on why the Deku Scrubs would worship a simple desert nomad. What confuses most people is they think that the Trident of Darkness possessed him, or something like that. All the inscription on that wall stated was that if Ganondorf seeked power and destruction he would be granted it, and he would become the King of Darkness. How is this any different than when Ganondorf the King of the Gerudo thieves, became the King of Evil by gaining the Triforce of Power? If Link was capable of gaining the three pendants of virtue, then he would be able to get the Master Sword, and become the Legendary Hero. Should we now suggest that Link is being possessed by some angel or divine power just because Link gained a powerful weapon much like what Ganondorf did.
The next question that is going to come up is how come Ganondorf is born in one time and born in another and still be the same person. Well it is because Ganondorf is a rejuvenating and reviving source. He is the Incarnation of Darkness. But when Ganon is referred to as the Ancient Demon Reborn, then everyone suggests that we have a whole new concept to deal with, when really it is the same thing. I plead with any member on this board to give me a reason to think that the two are not the same, and I will judge for myself, but I have been up and down FSA and the OoT, and I can't see how the two are different.
#23
Posted 06 December 2004 - 06:52 AM
#24
Posted 06 December 2004 - 09:17 AM
#25
Guest_BlackHawkA100_*
Posted 06 December 2004 - 12:57 PM
#26
Posted 06 December 2004 - 02:48 PM
So? The maps don't match up, why should anything else?I absolutely hated FSA's story, since it not only brought in a bunch of crap, but it directly contradicted things from previous games.
At this point, a good, overall timeline is impossible, IMHO.
#27
Posted 06 December 2004 - 07:15 PM
#28
Guest_Darkseid_*
Posted 07 December 2004 - 09:07 AM
#29
Posted 07 December 2004 - 02:29 PM
Ganondorf came first. LoZ says Ganon was once a greedy man. ALttP says that man was named Ganondorf Dragmire. OoT shows how Ganondorf BECAME Ganon. What more do you need!? As for the whole Ganondorf/Ganon thing FSA, maybe Ganondorf reincarnated. That's the only logical explantion. If you try to put FSA before OoT just for the sake of keeping one Ganondorf and say Ganon was an ancient demon who possesed him via the Trident of Darkness then you run into a whole lot problems and the whole storyline just falls apart at the seams.
#30
Guest_lord of illusion_*
Posted 07 December 2004 - 02:48 PM