You mean you highly assume that I've never read American comics; because advise is to direct someone toward doing something that would benefit that person. It would make more sense if you had said "I advise that you read DC or Marvel comic books." Yes...
Don't lecture me on semantics, it's not relevant and it's a failed attempt at looking smart. My point is that your argument basically states that the split timeline is true because it divides the story, but I can find you thousands of popular comic books, video games, movies, and literature involving a split in the timeline. Infact, the theory has some merit in real world physics.
Basically, instead of using evidence against the theory to try and disprove it, and making a solid argument on whythis event can't exist in the timeline, given that the purpose of timeline theorizing is to find the timeline that the creators may have intended, you're instead throwing out ideas purely because you don't like them, truth be damned.
Yes; I will seek the source because I am sure it was in one of the older Zelda games. I apologize for my vague comment on that.
I really look forward to you finding this source. Because, well, the statement doesn't exist.
I don't fill in gaps with non-related information I use what is in the storyline of each game (including the instruction booklets).
Really? Then explain how you put TP after PH when TP is said to be nigh a direct sequel to OOT? Go on. Try and justify it, using only stuff in the games and instruction manuals. No speculation allowed.
Find a problem in my timeline and present it to me, then.
After PH, how does Hyrule magically revive for TP, and people reference OOT with more coherent information than the people of TWW had? How come no one remembers a flood that destroyed their country? How come artifacts like the Mirror of Twilight had apparently been preserved perfectly when Hyrule and all it's artifacts were washed away and lost? How do the Oracles Games come after TP, when Oracles requires the Triforce to be kept in a palace, even though the Triforce of Power TP Ganondorf possessed vanished, instead of manifesting for Link and Zelda to claim?
After that, when you get to LTTP, how do you get the Triforce from a palace to being in the Sacred Realm where it apparently hadn't been disturbed for as long as anyone can possibly remember? Furthermore, back to OOT, how come Twinrova is trying to revive an incarnation of Ganon that, as far as your timeline is concerned, never existed before?
Why do you place MC after LP instead of LA, even though LA is a direct sequel to LTTP, even referencing LTTP's events in the game manual and game prologue? Why do you place LZ and AL inbetween MC and FS? How did the Triforce magically vanish from the country for the events of MC only to appear up in LZ? Yea, sure, you can use the Triforce of Courage/Sleeping Zelda story, but that doesn't explain why the Royal Family of LZ doesn't have the Triforce of Wisdom and Power, even though by all logic they should and must?
It's a trainwreck.
Alright, you revised your split timeline, so I'll look at that.
WW:PH:LA:MC:FS:FSA
OT<
MM:TP:OS:OA:BS:LP:LZ:AL
Let's start with the WW branch. Why does LA come after PH? Because they both have oceans? LA Link is on a different boat and is traveling with no companions, and his journey is to find enlightenment and new adventures, instead of a new land. Where the hell is Tetra and the priates? Why does Link look so tremendously different? How come he mistakes Marin for Zelda when he should be calling out Tetra's name? Nevermind that Marin and and any seabound Zelda look nothing alike. And what about LA Link having set sail "after saving Hyrule and putting the people at rest about Ganon"? If I recall, Link didn't save Hyrule, he ultimately destroyed it, and the people of the oceans never even learned about Ganon. And then of course we have a new Hyrule magically appearing out of thin air somehow.
TP and onwards. Again, why does OOX come after TP? We have the same problems here. Same with OOX to LP. You have a lot of explaining to do, sir.
