Here is the question: would it be considered murder to kill a zombie?
Zombie Killing and Moral Ethics
#1
Posted 15 January 2008 - 01:59 PM
Here is the question: would it be considered murder to kill a zombie?
#2
Posted 15 January 2008 - 03:09 PM
#3
Posted 15 January 2008 - 03:13 PM
#4
Posted 15 January 2008 - 04:14 PM
What kind of zombie? An entirely brainless corpse animated somehow so that it can move? Or a Discworld-esque sentient zombie?
Animated Corpse-type.
#5
Posted 15 January 2008 - 05:15 PM
Well, they're already dead. So... I don't think it counts. Besides, they'll probably be trying to eat your brains. So it's self-defense.
I concur.
Edited by Nameless_Joe, 15 January 2008 - 05:16 PM.
#6
Posted 15 January 2008 - 06:55 PM
So, two points - is a zombie a human being? And is it lawful to kill zombies?
An animated corpse probably doesn't really count as a human any more, even if it's a human corpse...
#7
Posted 15 January 2008 - 08:01 PM
Now, vampires, vampires are a bit more of an interesting subject, since while being 'undead' (sort of...) they retain all their memories and many personality traits, and in some cases can even be cured or turn 'good'. Yet a vampire is generally way more dangerous than a single zombie.
#8
Posted 15 January 2008 - 11:45 PM
Does everyone agree with me that disregarding the ethics thing for a minute, the shotgun is the universal zombie killer?
And can a zombie be put on trial for his killings? I mean, I think it'd be a rather horrid affair. They'd probably eat their defense lawyer or something!
#9
Posted 16 January 2008 - 03:43 AM
But if you murder an animal (house pet, at least), you can get in serious legal trouble. If it's a wild animal, you at least need a license. So...you can only kill it during Zombie Season?Murder: "The deliberate and unlawful killing of a human being, esp. in a premeditated manner."
However, as someone else originally killed it (well, another zombie did at least), might you just be a conspirator in the murder by finishing the job?
#10
Posted 16 January 2008 - 06:44 AM
- They're already quite dead
- They're a danger to society/humanity
- Not killing them would have an adverse effect on everything
Yeah.
Other types of demon, as Fyxe pointed out, would probably be more interesting.
#11
Posted 16 January 2008 - 02:45 PM
So...you can only kill it during Zombie Season?

#12
Posted 16 January 2008 - 04:03 PM
But if you're justifying murdering them because they're a 'threat', what about other dangers to our species? How many innocent sharks, wolves, bears, etc who were living in harmony with their own habitat, minding their own business, have been murdered because humans figure the world is better off without them? How many movies and stories (e.g. Jaws or Little Red Riding Hood) have been released that have spurned the death of dozens, hundreds, even thousands of one species over time?- They're a danger to society/humanity
I submit that even one unjust Zombie movie or one single death by zombie would (much like in the death of Steve Irwin by stingray) cause the mass murder of a harmless and already fragile (if not endangered) species. Poor zombies. u.u
#13
Posted 16 January 2008 - 04:36 PM
Similarly, I like dogs, but if one attacked me and I were in serious danger as a result, I would have no reservations of defending myself, even if the results were fatal to the dog.
There were way too many commas in that last sentence. It's probably run-on.
#14
Posted 16 January 2008 - 06:28 PM
I think you're confusing "potentially dangerous" animals (various animals, who unless disturbed won't attack you) and "always dangerous" zombies (who specifically hunt and attack humans).But if you're justifying murdering them because they're a 'threat', what about other dangers to our species? How many innocent sharks, wolves, bears, etc who were living in harmony with their own habitat, minding their own business, have been murdered because humans figure the world is better off without them? How many movies and stories (e.g. Jaws or Little Red Riding Hood) have been released that have spurned the death of dozens, hundreds, even thousands of one species over time?- They're a danger to society/humanity
I submit that even one unjust Zombie movie or one single death by zombie would (much like in the death of Steve Irwin by stingray) cause the mass murder of a harmless and already fragile (if not endangered) species. Poor zombies. u.u
Not to mention a rogue animal attack usually leaves 1 or 2 dead; a zombie attack is known to usually wipe out an entire city.
#15
Posted 16 January 2008 - 06:41 PM
Beat me to it; Zombies murder people "living in harmony with their own habitat, minding their own business." It's a completely separate thing.I think you're confusing "potentially dangerous" animals (various animals, who unless disturbed won't attack you) and "always dangerous" zombies (who specifically hunt and attack humans).But if you're justifying murdering them because they're a 'threat', what about other dangers to our species? How many innocent sharks, wolves, bears, etc who were living in harmony with their own habitat, minding their own business, have been murdered because humans figure the world is better off without them? How many movies and stories (e.g. Jaws or Little Red Riding Hood) have been released that have spurned the death of dozens, hundreds, even thousands of one species over time?- They're a danger to society/humanity
I submit that even one unjust Zombie movie or one single death by zombie would (much like in the death of Steve Irwin by stingray) cause the mass murder of a harmless and already fragile (if not endangered) species. Poor zombies. u.u
Not to mention a rogue animal attack usually leaves 1 or 2 dead; a zombie attack is known to usually wipe out an entire city.
Although I'll have to agree that the Vampire/Werewolf/other mystical creature debate would be more fun.
It is, but the flamethrower is by far the funnest weapon.Does everyone agree with me that disregarding the ethics thing for a minute, the shotgun is the universal zombie killer?
#16
Posted 16 January 2008 - 09:44 PM
However, IF zombies exists and I wanted to join in this pointless debate, let me through in my two cents. It seems to me that currently we're trying to decide if zombies count as human to comply with current federal and state laws about murder. Now that can be argued back and forth, but maybe it would be worthwhile noting that there are also laws about the tampering of human remains. And being dead and all, wouldn't the act the "killing" of a zombie classify that under those laws and therefore be prosecutable? Something to think about.
But enough of that nonsense, lets talk about vampires. There are well documents conditions were people are sensitive to light, and a thirst for blood, however disgusting, isn't implausible. And super human strength, well let's just agree that there are those who would confuse a person with certain medical conditions as a vampire. Especially if that person has "evil" tendencies. Now, if someone where to try to kill that person, I would suppose that someone would definitely be a suspect in a murder investigation because the vampire person was very much still alive. Even if that person paraded around as a vampire killing others to suck their blood. The do still prosecute people who murder the murderers, you know.
#17
Posted 16 January 2008 - 10:12 PM
No, really? Damn. And here I was, afraid to go to bed at night cause the zombies would get me.Ok, first off, let me point out that it is physically impossible for zombies to exist. After doing a little research I find that the origination of the zombie come from the Afro-Caribbean spiritual belief system of Vodou. Also I learn that the original zombie is very different form the popularized modern version of today's media. So, that should be further proof that the zombie we're talking about killing is simply a figment of human imagination. And you can't kill that.
Any creature which attacks me (or any other human, for that matter) with intent to kill can be slain without moral regret, unless one could have disabled the creature without risking your life. I think most would agree with me that that is perhaps the most basic human right, one which is impossible to take away. So, if a zombie, werewolf, vampire, lichen, wildebat, or any other kind've strange creature attacked me, I would kill it.
#18
Posted 16 January 2008 - 11:41 PM
And of course 'zombie' (The way I use it) refers to eat your brain, Dawn of the Dead/Resident Evil/Zombie Movie-style zombies.
And 'vampire' (Also the way I use it) means Dracula-style predatory bloodsuckers.
#19
Posted 17 January 2008 - 12:29 AM
Zombies
All zombies are to be terminated via shotgun as soon as humanly possible. One zombie can cause a nationwide outbreak. Most of the time, however, outbreaks are isolated cases in small country cities, mansions, Mexico, or Nazi German castles. If shotgun ammunition is too scarce to eliminate the threat in such areas, then you are advised to nuke them into oblivion. Potential side effect: Radioactive zombies; Radioactive Nazi zombies.
Werewolves
Werewolves can be fully integrated into society. Werewolves must be accompanied by a human guardian during full moons. All werewolves must be registered and kept on a lease while outdoors during these time periods. If werewolf requires flesh for nutrition, owner must buy sides of beef or pork loins at the store. Dogfood (preferably canned) also acceptable. Failure to care for your werewolf will result in a fine of $1000. Confiscation of animal may also occur.
Poltergeists
Friendly prankster poltergeist should be preserved for use on door-to-door salesmen. For malicious entities, please call your local Ghostbusters team.
Vampires
Well mannered, optimistic vampires who feed on legal blood purchased from a medical clinic may remain active members of the nighttime society. Murderous and/or needlessly angst ridden emo vampires are to be staked through the heart as soon as possible. For the sake of sane people and fanfiction readers.
#20
Posted 17 January 2008 - 12:36 AM
Murderous and/or needlessly angst ridden emos
vampireare to be staked through the heart as soon as possible. For the sake of sane people and fanfiction readers.
Fixed.
Edited by CID Farwin, 17 January 2008 - 12:37 AM.
#21
Posted 22 January 2008 - 03:54 PM
Murderous and/or needlessly angst ridden emos
vampireare to be staked through the heart as soon as possible. For the sake of sane people and fanfiction readers.
Fixed.
Nice. That gave me some nice LULZ.
#22
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:36 PM
Traditionally, vampires are bloated and rosy/ruddy skinned...
#23
Posted 23 January 2008 - 06:14 AM
*blows Pomazon's head off with a shotgun*LULZ.
For the sake of society.
#24
Posted 24 January 2008 - 03:05 AM
Hey, now, those Nazi zombies were the creation of Dr. Guehziebgilxufblwhatever. Not really an "outbreak" as much as "genetic mutilating".RULES OF SUPERNATURAL ENGAGEMENT
Zombies
All zombies are to be terminated via shotgun as soon as humanly possible. One zombie can cause a nationwide outbreak. Most of the time, however, outbreaks are isolated cases in small country cities, mansions, Mexico, or Nazi German castles. If shotgun ammunition is too scarce to eliminate the threat in such areas, then you are advised to nuke them into oblivion. Potential side effect: Radioactive zombies; Radioactive Nazi zombies.
At least, that's what the manual says.
#25
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:19 PM
*blows Pomazon's head off with a shotgun*LULZ.
For the sake of society.
That was a bit harsh, don't you think?
#26
Posted 24 January 2008 - 11:43 PM
The same would have occurred if you said 'kawaii' at any point before or after 'LULZ.'
Or if you used this face: :3
#27
Posted 25 January 2008 - 12:45 AM
#28
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:17 AM
It seems we have come to the solid agreement that reanimated corpses that merely follow basic carnivorous instincts are OK to kill and/or slaughter. However, if they are people under the influence of magic or mind control they are by no means to be killed. Does all this sound right?
#29
Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:25 PM
#30
Posted 29 January 2008 - 10:41 PM










