24 replies to this topic

[Chikara Nadir]

The Book of LA states:

"Thou shalt not flame"
http://forums.legend...?showtopic=8767

Man, you're stupid.

http://forums.legend...?showtopic=8594

Probably half a billion, considering how ugly it is.

"Thou shalt not offer info about/access to emulation/ROMs"
http://forums.legend...?showtopic=8673


"Thou shalt not be outright crude."
http://forums.legend...?showtopic=9346

I wonder if the Pope masturbates.

You've had it a long way coming for a while, without anyone complaining until now. Suspended for a week (seven days) unless other admins/mods find reason for the punishment to be different.

[spunky-monkey]

You missed one:

http://forums.legend...?showtopic=9431

[Chikara Nadir]

Naw, I saw it...I just was trying to round it up to those I was initially bothered by the most. But now that I look at it, him thanking someone for calling it the crudest thread in Zelda General makes it all the worse. Thanks.

[DarkJuno]

Um....while the asshat more then deserves it for any of the other single comments here, the Dark Link/Kafei thing is something you can do with a Gameshark and the actual cart, so that's not all that illegal. Just frowned upon.

[Chikara Nadir]

Yeah...but ROMs are still something we try to keep away from unless positive that it's legally distributed, as the Rules say. Whatever the case, he at least deserved punishment for the other actions.

[Steel Samurai]

Doesn't Dav have roms on ZL?

[Doopliss]

I think it is almost impossible to find a legally distributed ROM. In addition, there are some Zelda games, as Kodai no Sekiban, that are impossible to play without an emulator, even in Japan, so maybe we should be able to discuss at least about those ROMs. However, it is still illegal...

[Trinbadman]

He wasn't really offering information on where to get ROMs or emulation, was he? He was just showing what you can do with a gameshark...

Also, saying those statues looked ugly really isn't offensive to anyone who's going to read it... it's just an observation.

Does the pope masturbate? Crude as heck, but damned if it isn't a good question.

Edited by Trinbadman, 20 June 2006 - 08:16 PM.

[Chikara Nadir]

Just a suspension, and it'll be over in a day.

[Trinbadman]

A day? That's far too long! I demand his freedom!

...I'll shut up now.

[TheAvengerLever]

I actually found him mentioned on Wikipedia, he's apparently something big...

He was under the same list as Lord of Shadow and some others

[Doopliss]

What exactly do you mean? Could you provide a link, please?

[TheAvengerLever]

Here it is.

[Doopliss]

Oh, thank you. Well, these rules apply equally to everyone anway... Nevertheless, I don't like a lot those kinds of articles (those that involve prominent members of a community), and I generally tend to doubt about thier neutrality, especially because we don't know who wrote them and because what defines a prominent member is mostly subjective.

[TheAvengerLever]

That's the same with me, but it just interested me that he's well known to the Zelda community.

[Chikara Nadir]

This is just to show that even if you're famous in your community, it doesn't mean you can get away with being a jerk.

[spunky-monkey]

I didn't know he was big in the Zelda on-line community...

wait a minute...doesn't that make it even worse?




And I'm not on Wikipedia.

[Chikara Nadir]

Then put yourself on. It IS a user-defined encyclopedia.

[TheAvengerLever]

It kind of reminds me of when celebrities do time...it's quite amusing to see Hugh Grant's mug shot.

[Chikara Nadir]

*sniffle* LA doesn't have a Wikipedia article...

Why? ;_;

[Goose]

Whats stopping us as a collective?

We all contribute to a topic in the commons, and write it up, then post it. It can be the complete history of LA.

[DarkJuno]

Yes, but we can't possibly be arsed for that - besides, you'd have to find someone completely subjective to everyone, and that'll be tough.

So long as I'm listed as the ornery, perpetually irritated old guy, I'll be fine. ;p

[Chikara Nadir]

Yes, but we can't possibly be arsed for that - besides, you'd have to find someone completely subjective to everyone, and that'll be tough.

So long as I'm listed as the ornery, perpetually irritated old guy, I'll be fine. ;p

Though you ARE one of the more likely candidates for writing up the history of LA, considering how many times you HAVE helped contribute...you know what I mean. XP Actually, methinks I shall start a Commons thread about it.

*cough* http://forums.legend...?showtopic=9656

[Steel Samurai]

Referring back to the above statement about him being in wikipedia . . . knowing what we do about him, isn't it jsut as likely that he wrote himself in?

[GJ Skywalker]

Probably one of the reasons why the article was deleted.