NES game "Color a Dinosaur"
#1
Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:10 PM
#2
Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:13 PM
#3
Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:19 PM
Trust me, 13. I read in Nintendo Power Volume 100 that "Color a Dinosaur" was one of the Top-Ten worst Nintendo games ever released. Here of course is the Gamefaqs review page of this game: http://www.gamefaqs....iew/587195.htmlAnd people say today's games are horrible. O.o
Edit: Still, I'm glad I never played that "prehistoric pansy" of a game.
#4
Guest_Eizan Tayama_*
Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:30 PM
But still E.T. is still much worse...
#5
Posted 11 September 2005 - 09:42 PM
Yea, I have a complete copy, but I haven't touched it.
But still E.T. is still much worse...
Are you sure E.T. is worse than Color a Dinosaur, Eizan Tayama? Let me check the ratings on Gamefaqs to see if you're correct....
(After checking Gamefaqs) Yeah, it's a bad game alright. Poorly designed, as you said. But the game still isn't as bad as Color a Dinosaur. Color a Dinosaur had a few more bad reviews than E.T. did. As a matter of fact, I believe that "Color a Dinosaur" was the worst NES game in existence. Overall, from what I calculated using the ratings from Gamefaqs, I'd say the average rating for Color a Dinosaur is 1.5/10, and the average rating for E.T. is 2.8/10. This sounds like an indication that Color a Dinosaur is indeed worse.
#6
Posted 12 September 2005 - 01:06 AM
#7
Posted 12 September 2005 - 05:53 PM
#8
Posted 12 September 2005 - 06:09 PM
#9
Guest_Eizan Tayama_*
Posted 12 September 2005 - 08:59 PM
Are you sure E.T. is worse than Color a Dinosaur, Eizan Tayama? Let me check the ratings on Gamefaqs to see if you're correct....
(After checking Gamefaqs) Yeah, it's a bad game alright. Poorly designed, as you said. But the game still isn't as bad as Color a Dinosaur. Color a Dinosaur had a few more bad reviews than E.T. did. As a matter of fact, I believe that "Color a Dinosaur" was the worst NES game in existence. Overall, from what I calculated using the ratings from Gamefaqs, I'd say the average rating for Color a Dinosaur is 1.5/10, and the average rating for E.T. is 2.8/10. This sounds like an indication that Color a Dinosaur is indeed worse.
When has a rating every proved that a game is worse of all time?
Reviews are nothing but opinions, I mean I own both games, and played each one once, but I ET to be worse. Also, I've seen ET voted as the worse game of all time, and it was on G4. So I don't know what to go with, a national vote for a bad game or 10-15 reviews? Which Gamefaq's has had BS reviews before. Either way its still opinions.
And by Gamefaq's, Superman 64 is worse game ever, that I've found.
#10
Posted 13 September 2005 - 10:19 AM
If you call that a game... it's boooooring. Just look at it, it's worse than Paint
#11
Posted 13 September 2005 - 03:18 PM
![]()
If you call that a game... it's boooooring. Just look at it, it's worse than Paint
I agree with you about that, RevolutionDude. It is worse than Paint. It's also far worse than Mario Paint for the SNES. Color a Dinosaur was an excuse for a game. Not even worth it for the age group it was designed for. I feel that for them, it was a waste of their time.
#12
Posted 13 September 2005 - 03:31 PM
#13
Posted 13 September 2005 - 03:47 PM
I was wondering if anybody remembered that game. I don't have any memory of it since I never owned it nor rented it. I'm certainly glad about that.haha i remember this game but why are you making this topic now?
#14
Posted 13 September 2005 - 03:50 PM
#15
Posted 13 September 2005 - 03:53 PM
#16
Posted 13 September 2005 - 05:20 PM
#17
Posted 13 September 2005 - 07:48 PM
Dude. Mario Party for SNES > American government.I agree with you about that, RevolutionDude. It is worse than Paint. It's also far worse than Mario Paint for the SNES. Color a Dinosaur was an excuse for a game. Not even worth it for the age group it was designed for. I feel that for them, it was a waste of their time.










