25 replies to this topic

[He-Man]

Does anybody know who was at the following user page? I've tried going there, but it says "Invalid User specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the webmaster". The page I'm talking about is "http://forums.legendsalliance.com/member.php?u=2". The user obviously was an admin. If so, who was it?

[Toan]

Sounds like it was a test admin, like l-o-s2 or khuffie2 or something. The did it while setting up LA, once it was no longer needed then kablam, they got killed.

[He-Man]

I suppose you didn't notice before, Toan?

[Toan]

Nah. When LA died last September, I remember the night on...I believe it was the 14th when Khuffie told us all he was getting it back up that night. I stayed up as LONG as I could before my mother finally kicked me off the computer. It was upsetting...I would've been a member number JUST after the admins had I gotten the opportunity. Instead I registered either during school the next day or after school, and became #55. Much better than my old LA standing of #1594, eh?

But yeah, by the time that LA was back up and I could check it out, that other user #2 was nowhere to be seen.

[Alakhriveion]

Nah. When LA died last September, I remember the night on...I believe it was the 14th when Khuffie told us all he was getting it back up that night. I stayed up as LONG as I could before my mother finally kicked me off the computer. It was upsetting...I would've been a member number JUST after the admins had I gotten the opportunity. Instead I registered either during school the next day or after school, and became #55. Much better than my old LA standing of #1594, eh?

But yeah, by the time that LA was back up and I could check it out, that other user #2 was nowhere to be seen.

*flaunts his #21*

[Toan]

It's actually #27, Alak. See = http://forums.legend...member.php?u=27

[Alakhriveion]

It's actually #27, Alak. See = http://forums.legend...member.php?u=27

That's what I meant. The digits look very similar. Curse this human shell!

Am I still top poster?

[He-Man]

As far as I know, you still are, here at LA. But I know people with higher post counts than you, though. Especially somebody with 7,000+ posts.

[Toan]

Chik used to have 21,000 before teh hack....and I've seen that many on other forums as well. Some of the IGN Board users need to get a life (50,000, one of the oldest editors had 300,000)...

[Hero of Winds]

*flaunts his #21*

*flaunts his #8, first non-admin member*

[Alakhriveion]

As far as I know, you still are, here at LA. But I know people with higher post counts than you, though. Especially somebody with 7,000+ posts.

Well, yeah. I was way higher than this before the hack, but there were people with twice as many as me.

[He-Man]

Chik used to have 21,000 before teh hack....and I've seen that many on other forums as well. Some of the IGN Board users need to get a life (50,000, one of the oldest editors had 300,000)...

I've heard of 50,000. But 300,000 posts? That's far more than I've ever seen anybody with. Shouldn't us ask one of the admins about this user #2? Just to be sure it was a test admin? I also found out that there is no user #0.

[Hero of Winds]

I've heard of 50,000.  But 300,000 posts?  That's far more than I've ever seen anybody with.  Shouldn't us ask one of the admins about this user #2?  Just to be sure it was a test admin?  I also found out that there is no user #0.

Yeah, user#2 was (I recall) someone called Khuffie2 or test. I don't remember which, but I know the second member was either called Khuffie2 or test.

[Selena]

Mhm. It'd be a tester, probably. Since accounts 1-7 are all admins, and the boards were locked up before then, it couldn't have been anyone else. As for user 0, why would there be? Zero is non-existant. If Khuffie is user 1, there wouldn't be anyone before him.



And I had around 10,000 posts before the hack. Ah, all that hard spamming work. *sigh*

[Zythe]

That's a lot of posts. I signed off half an hour before LA got remade after the first start-up after the initial hack and got this crappy number the next day. Curses.

[Paladin Anthony]

I had a slightly similar question... that I didn't feel needed it's own thread.

But I've noticed the status bar on my comp is indicating there's an error on the page... on all LA pages. Does anyone else get that... and if so, have you seen any flaws?

[He-Man]

I had a slightly similar question... that I didn't feel needed it's own thread.  

But I've noticed the status bar on my comp is indicating there's an error on the page... on all LA pages. Does anyone else get that... and if so, have you seen any flaws?

Well, I do see something at the bottom of my status bar. Here's what it says:

"Line: 2
Char: 1
Error: Syntax Error
Code: 0
URL: http://forums.legend....846#post86846"

I have no idea what that's about. I can't see any flaws, yet it indicates there is one. I'm using Internet Explorer version 6.0.

I hope Khuffie knows what that could be.

[Selena]

No problems with Firefox. Maybe it's just an Explorer thing.

[Alakhriveion]

Explorer IS the problem.

[wisp]

Yeah, I don't get any errors on my Firefox.

[He-Man]

It's indeed Internet Explorer that is displaying the error. And thank you about letting me know that User #2 must have been a test admin. That's the only thing it could have been.

[Chikara Nadir]

I have IE, and no error message. Hmm...if I clear out my temp files and get it then, I'll tell you.

Edit: Nope, no error message here. Not just an IE problem.

[He-Man]

That.... I don't get. You don't have the problem, and I do (when I'm on IE). Right now I'm on AOL however, and so there's no error. What's your IE version?

[Chikara Nadir]

7.0, and I update regularly.

[He-Man]

Ummm.... You must be using Mozilla, Chik. I went to the Microsoft Website and they don't have Intenet Explorer 7.0 available yet. I did check about it though and it was mentioned in an IE blog that a beta of Internet Explorer 7.0 will be available this summer.

[Chikara Nadir]

Sorry, I meant 6.0 - I was mistaking the number for MSN 7.0. I think I'd know what type of net service I use, though.