Check the spelling and grammar again. You've got a spelling mistake in the first sentence... "It stats that the desired path of action". There's a bit later on in the essay that states: "Williams argues against this with the point that Jim's feelings about his actions." That Jim's feelings about his actions what? Also, immediately after:
"He says that since utilitarianism leaves aside integrity and feelings, and it takes away the idea that we as human beings should be responsible for our own actions as opposed to the actions of others."
That doesn't seem complete to me, because of your use of the word, "since". I'm waiting for a consequence. Since utilitarianism does all the things you stated, what then? What is the result of utilitarianism donig that?
Also, it might just be because I come from a science background, but the way you've constructed your essay looks weird to me.
Williams also says that utilitarianism's disconnect from moral feelings 'alienates one from one's actions as well'.
Is the above a quote from the book you've referenced? If so, which page? See this URL for more info: http://www.monash.ed...urces/2.5.2.xml
I also see a real lack of references. Now this might be because you're only referencing the one book, but the question is, should you be referencing the one book? How easy is it for you to find a utilitarian's counter-critique of Bernard Williams's criticism? Would it be a good idea to quote what an actual utilitarian has said?
Check your essay again for sentences that don't seem quite complete. Also, reconsider some of the sentences. Could you reword them so they're more concise? For example, I would argue that your sentence:
"He says that since utilitarianism leaves aside integrity and feelings, and it takes away the idea that we as human beings should be responsible for our own actions as opposed to the actions of others" should read:
"He says that since utilitarianism ignores a person's integrity, feelings and the idea of personal responsibility for our own actions..."
That's about it, I think. Keep up the good work and don't forget to properly reference your source materials.
Edited by Wolf O'Donnell, 11 November 2013 - 05:13 PM.