
TSA Is Really This Paranoid?!
Started by
LoreleiRaven
, Dec 03 2011 05:39 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 December 2011 - 05:39 PM
http://news.yahoo.co...-221835034.html
This actually kind of bugs me. It's taking it to extremes when now passengers have to be wary of what designs are on their clothes and bags.
I understand they just want everything and everyone to be safe... but this new level of paranoia is a little much.
This actually kind of bugs me. It's taking it to extremes when now passengers have to be wary of what designs are on their clothes and bags.
I understand they just want everything and everyone to be safe... but this new level of paranoia is a little much.
#2
Posted 03 December 2011 - 05:50 PM
I wonder when I visit the states whether I'd get detained for wearing a Benedict Arnold t-shirt!
#3
Posted 03 December 2011 - 05:52 PM
You might... If he is carrying a gun

#4
Posted 03 December 2011 - 05:58 PM
hahaha.
That's ludicrous. If I never fly again it will be too soon.
That's ludicrous. If I never fly again it will be too soon.
#5
Posted 03 December 2011 - 06:28 PM
In light of other news she's lucky they didn't decide to hand her over to the military to be held indefinitely.
#6
Posted 03 December 2011 - 07:14 PM
No one stopped me carrying acid on to a plane though, I could have damaged some marble flooring!
#7
Posted 04 December 2011 - 04:06 PM
As much as I hate the TSA (and the Obama administration for campaigning on ceasing the war on terror yet continuing to sanction Bush-era policies), I have to say that this isn't really that outrageous. After all, the 9/11 highjackers accomplished their objective with boxcutters, and might have even gotten away with it if they were using replica weapons. Is it really that hard to believe that some idiot on the plane won't mistake the purse for the real thing and spread mass paranoia? I could totally see terrorists using a pregnant teen to get a replica weapon on a plane, and then passing it off to the Arab-looking dude (no, I don't support racial profiling).
Now, some common sense would have been nice here. But of all the bad things the TSA has done, I don't think this is so bad. Even before 9/11, you couldn't say "bomb" on an airplane. This is sort of the same thing.
Now, some common sense would have been nice here. But of all the bad things the TSA has done, I don't think this is so bad. Even before 9/11, you couldn't say "bomb" on an airplane. This is sort of the same thing.
#8
Posted 04 December 2011 - 04:49 PM
If it was an actuall replica it would be one thing. This was a picture. A picture on a purse. Not a replica.
#9
Posted 04 December 2011 - 05:13 PM
True, but it's a picture with some depth. Cut it out of the purse and I could see it being reasonably mistaken (by someone with bad eyesight) for a gun. Especially in close quarters when you've got it pressed against somebody or something. Like I said, seems to me a lot like saying bomb on an airplane.
#10
Posted 04 December 2011 - 06:32 PM
Bad eyesight or not... this is a very small clutch purse, with a hollow design on it that would fit in your closed hand. I believe it is too small, especially when cut from the purse, to be mistaken as a real gun.
I do not see why it warranted such an investigation that caused this girl to miss her flight, and then be put on a plane going to a different city than where she was supposed to be going.
I do not see why it warranted such an investigation that caused this girl to miss her flight, and then be put on a plane going to a different city than where she was supposed to be going.