
Is the G&W Zelda part of the timeline?
#1
Posted 02 December 2004 - 02:37 PM
#2
Guest_Tigan_*
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:15 PM
#3
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:36 PM
I suppose there are those who disagree with me, but... no. I don't consider it part of the Zelda timeline.
#4
Guest_Zangus_*
Posted 02 December 2004 - 07:17 PM
#5
Posted 02 December 2004 - 07:24 PM

The only significant detail it adds to the overal Zelda mythologies is that it aknowledges a romantic relationship between Link and Zelda.
#6
Posted 02 December 2004 - 07:47 PM
The only significant detail it adds to the overal Zelda mythologies is that it aknowledges a romantic relationship between Link and Zelda.
Not really. With the way the games are going, it seems to be that the relationship between Zelda and Link is a deep friendship that we cannot possibly understand. The best way I can explain it is that their soulmates, but they're not meant for each other romantically. (since they can't get together, thanks to fate). Kinda like...well, let's think of examples, Yugi and Yami from Yugioh, a person and their spirit guide, a digidestined and their digimon, ok, these examples suck, but you all know what I mean x.x
#7
Posted 03 December 2004 - 01:25 AM
Not really. With the way the games are going, it seems to be that the relationship between Zelda and Link is a deep friendship that we cannot possibly understand. The best way I can explain it is that their soulmates, but they're not meant for each other romantically. (since they can't get together, thanks to fate). Kinda like...well, let's think of examples, Yugi and Yami from Yugioh, a person and their spirit guide, a digidestined and their digimon, ok, these examples suck, but you all know what I mean x.x
Like Romeo and Juliet, right? Forever apart, yet unable to be together?
#8
Posted 03 December 2004 - 01:38 AM
Not really. With the way the games are going, it seems to be that the relationship between Zelda and Link is a deep friendship that we cannot possibly understand. The best way I can explain it is that their soulmates, but they're not meant for each other romantically. (since they can't get together, thanks to fate). Kinda like...well, let's think of examples, Yugi and Yami from Yugioh, a person and their spirit guide, a digidestined and their digimon, ok, these examples suck, but you all know what I mean x.x
Well, yes.. but the point I was making is that IN THE G & W GAME, they have a romantic relationship - it is specifically mentioned in it's manual that Zelda is Link's 'sweetheart'. That's the word that is used. That's the only thing it really has in it that would have an impact on the overall storyline of the games, if it were considered canonical

#9
Guest_Lysia_*
Posted 03 December 2004 - 02:56 AM
#10
Posted 03 December 2004 - 08:34 AM
#11
Posted 03 December 2004 - 09:39 AM
#12
Posted 03 December 2004 - 10:09 AM
I don't think it's a canonical part of the timeline... but personally, I secretly like to count it as it was actually quite a fun little game, and it doesn't impact on the storyline's of the other games in any way to make it impossible to slot into a timeline
Also, it has a storyline of it's own - it's not just a rehash of LoZ. It basically goes - There were eight dragons who refused to live at peace with Hyrule, so they kidnapped Link's sweetheart Princess Zelda and broke the Triforce into eight parts. Link has to fight through the dragons underground palaces and retrieve the peices of the Triforce, as well as rescue Princess Zelda.
That's why I asked. Nothing in the game really seems to contradict anything in the rest of the series.
#13
Posted 03 December 2004 - 02:08 PM
But I am semi-open to counting the CD-i games...they all just take place immediately after The Adventure of Link...
#14
Posted 03 December 2004 - 06:51 PM

While on the subject of counting games that aren't usually counted, I also like to consider the other BS Zelda game (based on aLttP), Kodai no Sekiban - it actually has a story of it's own.
#15
Posted 03 December 2004 - 08:19 PM
#16
Posted 04 December 2004 - 08:33 AM
The full story of Kodai no Sekiban is listed in the 'Game History' section, and there's screenshots and other stuff about the BS (man that's an unfortunate acronym) Zelda games.
#17
Posted 05 December 2004 - 02:44 PM
#18
Posted 05 December 2004 - 03:36 PM
#19
Posted 05 December 2004 - 07:13 PM

And again, the Game and Watch IS different to the original LoZ - different plot, and a pretty major difference in the gameplay; it has an AoL style side view.
#20
Posted 06 December 2004 - 06:45 AM
#21
Posted 06 December 2004 - 09:08 PM
The Legend of Zelda -> The Adventure of Link -> Game and Watch -> Neslonic Watch -> The Wand of Gamelon -> The Faces of Evil -> Zelda's Adventure
Yep. And BS-Kodai no Sekiban had two versions - the BS Mascot quests about gathering the stone tablets to seal Ganon, and the 2nd Quest of A Link to the Past.
#22
Guest_Zangus_*
Posted 06 December 2004 - 09:15 PM
That reminds me, I used to have the Neslonic Watch Zelda. Until I bit through the band when I was younger and then just tossed it. I feel dumb now.
#23
Posted 06 December 2004 - 10:05 PM
Also, what about the Zelda board game?

I think the Triforce of the Gods/aLttP BS thing was just a direct port of aLttP wasn't it? Or was it rearranged in some way as well?