
Dopplegangers
#1
Posted 12 July 2007 - 02:38 PM
#2
Posted 12 July 2007 - 03:33 PM
#3
Posted 12 July 2007 - 07:29 PM
Edited by SOAP, 12 July 2007 - 07:30 PM.
#4
Posted 12 July 2007 - 08:18 PM

Anyway,
It might be possible, but it's at least trillions-to-one odds.
Am I the only one reminded of Joey's Identical hand-twin on Friends? and anyway what about cloning?
#5
Posted 12 July 2007 - 08:25 PM
You just had to say that SOAP, Didn't you. I'll spare everyone the immense library of jokes you've just opened yourself up to.

Anyway,
It might be possible, but it's at least trillions-to-one odds.
Am I the only one reminded of Joey's Identical hand-twin on Friends? and anyway what about cloning?
I'm referring identical copies of the same person that occur in nature that aren't born from the same mother.
Actually I think I have an identical twin cousin on my dad's side but I'm not sure since we don't associate with his side of the family anymore.
Edited by SOAP, 12 July 2007 - 08:26 PM.
#6
Posted 12 July 2007 - 08:38 PM
I gathered as much; I was trying to be funny.I'm referring identical copies of the same person that occur in nature that aren't born from the same mother.
#7
Posted 12 July 2007 - 10:01 PM
I gathered as much; I was trying to be funny.I'm referring identical copies of the same person that occur in nature that aren't born from the same mother.
The hand thing was funny. I remember that episode.
#8
Posted 12 July 2007 - 10:15 PM
#9
Posted 12 July 2007 - 10:23 PM
#10
Posted 13 July 2007 - 05:56 AM
#11
Posted 14 July 2007 - 04:21 PM
#12
Posted 15 July 2007 - 11:09 PM
Maybe not on earth, but somewhere in the universe I'm sure there's an exact copy of you.
Now that's possible, of course that's if it's even possible.
#13
Posted 18 July 2007 - 06:45 PM
There are just too many combinatory possibilities for DNA, so probably the exact same code won't occur twice.
Also, people's DNA necessarily resembles their ancestors' DNA to some extent, so that outside of one family's line it's even more unlikely to happen. And inside one family's line, I think it won't happen because of the many possible combinations.
#14
Posted 26 July 2007 - 02:50 PM
i turned around and said,"excuse me, but who are you?"
"OMG!!, im soo srry thought you were my stepbrother"
"uhhh, no and its ok people make mistakes"
later in the evening i saw a picture and i thought to myself who has a picture of me here (being as i was still new to the school) and i asked the person how they got the picture and they said they took it of *insert name here* and the next day i met the guy and hung out with him...then i became good friends with him and i stayed at his house...now the sad thing was that his parrents couldent tell us apart. O.o
#15
Posted 26 July 2007 - 09:10 PM
#16
Posted 27 July 2007 - 09:06 AM
#17
Posted 27 July 2007 - 09:19 AM
#18
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:40 PM
They always say that no two people can ever have an identic fingerprint. So I figure it's the same for the genetic fingerprint.
There are just too many combinatory possibilities for DNA, so probably the exact same code won't occur twice.
Also, people's DNA necessarily resembles their ancestors' DNA to some extent, so that outside of one family's line it's even more unlikely to happen. And inside one family's line, I think it won't happen because of the many possible combinations.
Nah, fingerprints are exclusively determined by random phenomena, whereas random effects are much less likely to alter DNA. Also consider that most human DNA is identical with the DNA of all other humans, about 99.9% if I remember correctly.
#19
Posted 29 July 2007 - 04:33 PM
You may be right. I never considered that.People can look much alike, nigh identical, without actually having identical genes. Heck, people with the same genes can look totally different.
So there may a chance that one 1% can repeat more than once, producing two exact copies of the same person?They always say that no two people can ever have an identic fingerprint. So I figure it's the same for the genetic fingerprint.
There are just too many combinatory possibilities for DNA, so probably the exact same code won't occur twice.
Also, people's DNA necessarily resembles their ancestors' DNA to some extent, so that outside of one family's line it's even more unlikely to happen. And inside one family's line, I think it won't happen because of the many possible combinations.
Nah, fingerprints are exclusively determined by random phenomena, whereas random effects are much less likely to alter DNA. Also consider that most human DNA is identical with the DNA of all other humans, about 99.9% if I remember correctly.
#20
Posted 31 July 2007 - 03:05 AM
There is no chance that 100% of all DNA will be identical to that of another person, because let us not forget that your DNA also includes the stuff that codes for your antibodies. Antibodies are highly variable and highly susceptible to mutation. They have to be, if they're to "evolve" to tackle the nasty "germs" that enter your body. But no one person will be infected with the exact same concentration or type of germs in their entire life. Furthermore, as this DNA is highly susceptible to mutation, which is random, you will not be able to ensure that your clone undergoes the same mutations.
#21
Posted 31 July 2007 - 01:56 PM
#22
Posted 09 August 2007 - 03:01 AM
#23
Posted 09 August 2007 - 07:55 AM
Wolf. Rock on. I wish I could be that accurate.
But you were. That you didn't talk about antibodies is irrelevant.
#24
Posted 09 August 2007 - 06:02 PM
