Wolf_ODonnell said:
Anyways, Nintendo wouldn't make it ridiculously obvious. The top part is what gives it away. Those designs are unlike any other architexture in the Stone Tower. And if the pillars aren't supposed to be phallic, then the pointing hand doesn't have a reason to be there, especially so early in development.
Duke Serkol said:
Wolf_ODonnell said:
I'm sorry if I sound a bit angry, but I just came over from a forum where I had to debate against a guy that insists on making his religion (which just happened to be Christianity) the centre of everything. It just boils my blood when people insist on putting a religious spin on things when there isn't any reason to do so.
I'm not trying to prove this, because it can't be done unless Nintendo magically confirms it. All the evidence I've brought up could really be meaningless, as everyone's rightly pointed out, but I'm reluctant to believe that Nintendo made MM's backstory ambiguous just for the sake of being ambiguous. I really think this dark layer I've uncovered was meant to be there.
For instance, my evidence that Twinmold's lair was once Majora's prison is the fact that there are designs of the mask plastered over all the ruins, that it's logical to assume that the Stone Tower builders found that desert and built those ruins, and that it's an alternate realm like the field with the tree. Or the mask symbol could be there for the same reason the crescent moon and star were plastered all over Hyrule in OoT. These things are all either weird nonsense the developers threw in, or they're hidden clues to the deep dark secret of MM. Considering that MM was designed to be a mystery, as Mr. Miyamoto pointed out in Nintendo Power, I think this stuff deserves closer examination than unexplained stuff in a more straightforward game like OoT.

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote




